Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
Could YOU Adam & Eve It!! UKIP Compounds Criminality With Dishonest Stupidity!
Utterly Banged to Rights with statements, video, verbal and documentary provenance!
First we have the EUkip village idiot & bully boy gratuitously sending out his self serving drivel, he seems to be so incredibly thick that he does not even realise he, as a crooked little rascal, has been totally banged to rights for his criminality by Stuart Agnew - you will note on the video that Stuart Agnew CLEARLY states that what he, David Bannerman and Peter Reeve are involved in is illegal.
Just how clear does it have to be for someone of Reeve's caliber to understand and even then ignorance of the law is no defence.
In the correspondence Peter Reeve has mailed out is is so very clear that he threatens and intimidates which is itself a further offence:
From: reeve@ukip.org
To: johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Sunday Times
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:16:55 +0100
Thanks for your email. I am happy that the people I work for are honest and honourable people. I am not too worried about your story. It is not accurate and the few people who have seen it have been more interested in why are Tory donors wanting to give money to UKIP.Of course your friends in the racist BNP like the story and are helping you circulate it.Just a piece of friendly advise - I would watch how you use the term 'crooks' as inaccurate and false accusations could get you in legal trouble.Pete
so let us look closely at this quite ridiculous communication from the bullying simpleton:
I guess we all have our own standards but when a clear and unequivocal factual article backed by video evidence shows at least 4 of those he works for to be as bent as they come and clearly up to their neck in criminality it does make his claim look more than a little foolishThanks for your email. I am happy that the people I work for are honest and honourable people. I am not too worried about your story.
Is the idiot actually trying to claim The Sunday Times has printed an article that is not accurate!!! That is clearly libel.It is not accurate and the few people who have seen it have been more interested in why are Tory donors wanting to give money to UKIP.
The few people YOU KNOW who have seen it may well have the same attitude to criminality as Reeve clearly has - the significance of the source of the donations is utterly irrelevant to his involvement as a crook in criminality.
Yet again a libel - Produce proof of your idiotic comment Peter Reeve or be man enough to retract it and apologise.
Of course your friends in the racist BNP like the story and are helping you circulate it.
When a crook threatens someone - however obliquely - in order to silence the truth it tends to go against them very heavily when they find themselves in Court.Just a piece of friendly advise - I would watch how you use the term 'crooks' as inaccurate and false accusations could get you in legal trouble.
Actually worth noting that UKIP's selection process involved crooks like Peter Reeve, Stuart Agnew, Nigel Farage, Marta Andreassen and David Bannerman not to mention dishonest individuals like Andrew Smith, Michael McGough, Golom, Nuttall, Titford, George Curtis, Christopher Gill and other similar pond life! CLICK HERE-----Original Message-----Being exposed in the Sunday Times won't do you job or election prospects much good. How does it feel to work for crooks?
From: john west [mailto:johnwest81@hotmail.com]
Sent: 04 April 2010 11:04
To: reeve@ukip.org
Subject: RE: Sunday Times
From: reeve@ukip.org
To: johnwest81@hotmail.com
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 10:13:46 +0100
Subject: RE: Sunday Times
Thanks for your email.If that is the best you can do, it is clear why you were not good enough to get through our MEP selection process.
Indeed and we know the caliber of local journalists in the main who are endlessly trying to get jobs with papers like The Sun, The Telegraph, The Times, The News of the World, ll of whom John is in contact with - you will note that Farage made a total ass of himself on Hard Talk when trying to deal with information supplied by John West - perhaps you had not noticed that in Farage's desperation to get the egg off his face he provided a prima facie case of libel stating that John West was not a credible witness when you recal he showed Peter Reeve and Paul Nuttall up as idiots in Court and gained a guilty verdict against UKIP as The Farage Party.Interesting that the Cambridgeshire journalists that you have been attempting to contact over the last 12 months have told me that they have not touched your 'stories' because you come across as mentally unstable, or as one of them said 'as mad as a bag of cats'.
How long do you think Peter Reeve will last as a Councillor now he has been shown to drag their name in the gutter with letters like this - set aside his criminality as exposed in the media!PeteCllr Peter Reeve
Statement from the UK Independence Party
Sunday, 4th April 2010
May I suggest it was pretty damned clear and spin and misrepresentation by EUkip can only exacerbate their unfortunate and criminal position.Following the article in The Sunday Times (dated April 4th 2010) the UK Independence Party would like to make the following statement to clarify any misunderstandings.
The 'clarity' was added to by use of very clear clips admitting criminality and conspiring to commit a criminal act!
Indeed he did - he contacted the Leader Nigel Farage and the titular leader Malcolm Lord Pearson who both assisted in the conspiracy and Pearson also admitted he had previously used his company Global Britain to launder money.
As with all political parties, UKIP receives many offers of donations (both financial and voluntary help) everyday, so it was not unwise for Stuart Agnew MEP to follow up the offer made to him.
So UKIP's OFFICIAL position is that criminality is acceptable as long as you don't get caught - no wonder Lord Pearson, as an Old Etonian, feels so comfortable in UKIP!Perhaps, however, it was naive of Mr Agnew not to realise it was a Sunday Times reporter in disguise.
We would like to explain to UKIP that indeed a transaction DID take place it was a verbal and visual transaction and in and of itself, without the confessions of criminality, constituted a crime - namely: 'Conspiracy to fraudulently and criminally enact the crime of Money Laundering'. That in itself is a CRIME!
We would like to make it clear that no transaction between Mr Agnew and The Sunday Times journalist took place.
I believe you will find this is untrue - the law is pretty damned clear that no third party may be used to launder money - such that a law has been broken as in this case. Anonymous donations over the sum of £5,000 (at the time, NOW £7,500) are against electoral law. To take a single sum and pass it in order to create anonimity for the donor is in itself a crime.
The UK Independence Party did receive donations via Global Britain, in 2009 for the European Election Campaign. All these donations were, at the time, perfectly legal and within the guidelines set down by the Electoral Commission.
You will note in just the snippet provided Pearson confirmed UKIP had engaged in the crime of laundering £80K and also as far as he remembers a further £100K (58 seconds into the tape).
No they were not as UKIP was party to the money laundering so it was NOT a full disclosure. I am also aware of other money that was NOT recorded in the accounts.These donations were fully disclosed by UKIP in the second quarter of 2009.
The implication was clear that he believed he could get away with sums upto £25K but sums above were now a problem!
When asked by The Sunday Times reporter if her anonymity could be guaranteed, Lord Pearson, Leader of the UK Independence Party, clearly stated (as reported in the Sunday Times article) that he would check with the Electoral Commission and "if there was any doubt I would honestly rather go without.'"
UKIP members will recall that Andrew Smith, Nigel Farage, John Wittacker and others were regularly in 'communication' with El.Com. - in fact were there not 67 communications in various forms requesting UKIP regularise the donations of Alan Bown - yet in professional incompetence on the part of Andrew Smith and arrogant and dishonest hubris on the part of Nigel Farage it is clear that UKIP failed to heed those warnings nor try to co-operate and comply but in the style of Denny, McGough, Croucher and their ilk they chose to try to smear their opponents as they had no legal argument to support them.
Lord Pearson also added that he was regularly in touch with the Electoral Commission over Global Britain and all donations.
'Communication' did little to save UKIP from EARNING a Guilty verdict which due to their dishonesty and arrogance they turned from £18K forfeiture into a debt currently standing at £3/4Million and expected to rise to £1.2 Million early in July.
This is an outright lie - had he said 'of which I am aware' it could have been acceptable.
Mark Wadsworth, UKIP Treasurer, said today: "All donations or loans to the UK Independence Party have been reported to the Electoral Commission."
The sums he is aware of HAVE been declared but NOT openly and honestly.
UKIP would be wise to issue a general apology stating that the 5 individuals involved have been suspended pending a full clarification - clearly all 5 HAVE brought UKIP into disrepute, that is absolutely unarguable.
Who else was involved in this criminal behaviour?
ONLY a full external investigation can even hope to clear this mess and in the interim I suggest UKIP does all it can to clean up its act because this confession as exposed by The Sunday Times is clearly only a part of the systemic & endemic corruption that is Farage's EUkip.
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples - they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.
Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
to
Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate
LEAVE THE EU
to Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment