#123* - EUkip Before The Courts AGAIN!

#123* - EUkip Before The Courts AGAIN!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S LETTING DOWN ITS TROOPS!

Hi,

You will have read the build up to this shot across EUkip's bows in the copy eMails I have published from my leadership contacts.

John West first of all queried the dishonesty and incompetence of the selection and election, he wrote with queries and complaints, expecting an honest due process since it was administered by Christopher Gill whose reputation led Mr. West to believe he could trust Gill - how wrong he was! I understand his Private & Confidential letters were widely circulated by Gill himself - I know the copies I was sent certainly were!!

Gill's behaviour was beneath contempt as was almost every aspect of the corrupt process.

Those in doubt need go no further than to read EUkip's own appointed Returning Officer's report, which I have widely circulated and will be on this blog when I get time to post it as I'm trying to post in cronological order working back AND keep up to date (sorry I'm falling behind a bit, well a lot actually!)

Mr. West has made it abundantly clear that he did not expect to get selected merely experience and a fair chance in line with what was promised in the contract that EUkip entered into and acknowledged when they accepted his money.

You will have noted that not content with a criminal breech of the Data Protection Act, which the leader condoned - even it seems forcing his Chairman to sign a dishonest pack of lies in a letter which led to John Wittacker's fortuitous resignation. I say fortuitous because it gave Farage the opportunity to parachute in his own unelected puppet bought and paid for. Nuttall quite clearly lacks competence, integrity or morality and so clearly lacks the respect of all of his NEC that he had to call the Police to restore order when he found himself chairing his first NEC!

Mr. West has asked in many ways and often for a simple apology and now it seems he is ratchetting up the pressure, as it is clear that he has no intention to knuckle under to the bullying, lies and distortions being levelled at him and his wife, by EUkip.

Nor even to the illegal kangaroo courts and contrived ambushes - EUkip is digging its way deeper and deeper, in its dishonesty and disgracefull behaviour, it is fast reaching an irredeemable situation esspecially now their corrupt 'Reichstag Fire' moment has been 'spoofed' and the manipulation of their own Constitution rumbled - it makes a 'Kristall Nacht' more difficult to orchestrate and large as they may look in their shaving mirror they are far short of a Wanasee Conference & Final Solution.

They may be that odious but they just ain't that clever!

Hence this rather weak article in the local papers but when you think that Neil Puffet was unaware of the fraud, lies, embezelling and money laundering of Tom Wise as reported in the MSM or the fact that Tom Wise had been arrested and had just had his bail extended by some 3 months, for further investigations! This chappie seems a little out of touch as his sister paper in the same building has published the story - he failed to see the humour when I asked if he read the local papers!!

To be fair his sister paper did publish the drivel about Titford & Gulleford being cleared and the rumour has it that Mr. West made mallicious and unfounded allegations against Gollom & his handler - That Mr. West is likely to be prosecuted for wasting police time is utterly untrue, in fact I have spoken to the police and I can assure you that is a lie. However, one which I note the unwise in EUkip's team have committed libelously to paper.

Perhaps the next round!

The Evening Star - Ipswich

UKIP taken to court by candidate

12 November 2008 16:17

by: Neil Puffet

AN Ipswich general election candidate is taking his own party to court following a row over the selection process for becoming a Euro MP.John West, who will stand for election for UKIP in the North Ipswich and Central Suffolk constituency in the next general election, is demanding a £500 deposit back after failing to get the nod to represent the party at the next European elections due to be held next June.

Mr West declined to reveal details of the dispute but told The Evening Star he has lodged the matter with Ipswich County Court.UKIP have around three weeks to respond and if the matter is not settled the issue could go before a judge.Mr West, who is also UKIP chairman for Ipswich and east Suffolk, said:
“I can confirm I'm taking legal action against UKIP over the MEP selection process.”A spokesman for UKIP said: “Mr West underwent the same process as the rest of the candidates.“Unfortunately on this occasion he was not successful.

“We gather he is looking for the return of his deposit and the party will look into this at a senior level as soon as it can.”

Ipswich County Court was unable to confirm if a claim has been made.The East of England constituency has a total of seven MEPs representing the area in Brussels - in 2004 two UKIP candidates were elected from the region.

It is clear that EUkip haven't a leg to stand on as their own report from their own returning officer unequivocally admits their guilt - compounding this interim payments in liue of potential damages have been made as 'doucers' to Robin Page, Lyndda Robson and no doubt others wherein EUkip are in breech of contract, as outlined in the Returning Officer's report. I gather payments so far are in the region of £250, presumably as they try to negotiate damages for breech of contract.

Astonishingly EUkip are still dishonest enough to ask people to vote for them despite the undeniable fact that they can't run their own party!

This is a party which in 15 years has failed to run ANY training - how might they fare with the education brief?

This is a party with scant regard for Constitution - how might they be if called upon to uphold our Nation's destiny?

This is a party that has let their administration & justice internall tumbrel out of control - how might they behave with the Home Secretary's department?

This is a party where a senior spokesman said:

“We gather he is looking for the return of his deposit and the party will look into this at a senior level as soon as it can.”

Yest you will have seen elsewhere on my blog copies of the correspondence in which NuttAll - Farage's bought & paid for puppet - stated that he had taken legal advice (he's doomed if that is Oxley or Zucherman as it is increasingly clear the closest they have come to Silk is oggling it in a club!) NuttAll unwisely and briefly refused to either apologise or make good the payment.

It will be interesting to see, in Court, the provenance that every participant in the selection in discussion had personally paid, had provided a CRB, had provided their electoral role number and was a resident at the time.

Is EUkip alter its technique and stop digging but now try to fill the ends in - because it looks suspiciously as if their situation is terminal! In that it is quite clearly of their own making one is forced to wonder whether it is deliberate - as a false flag operation or merely on the childish basis of 'I'm having a party & you're not coming!'

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

#119* - The Betrayal Of The Branches & Democracy (02)

#119* - The Betrayal Of The Branches & Democracy (02)

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S BETRAYAL OF BRANCHES, MEMBERS & DEMOCRACY!

Hi,

shortly after I had written #118* - The Betrayal Of The Branches & Democracy (02) I received the follow up correspondence from an associate who had received it from an NEC member - in view of the current sordid Kafkaesque show trials following Nigel Farage's orchestrated 'Reichstag Fire' moment of the last NEC meeting may I assure one and all that neither Dr. David Abbott nor Dr. Eric Edmond have EVER leaked confidential NEC material to me.

For those who will screech like banshees as they chase around their little play pens like the packs of, out of control, bullying children in William Golding's 'Lord of the Flies' - Consider 'Time Lines' and when they joined the NEC or for that matter the party - relative to my inside information from the NEC from well before Michael Holmes was ousted in a similar witch hunt.

Well back to the 'Plot'!

It would seem that acting with scrupulous honesty and having not received even the courtesy of a reply from the NEC Martin Harvey called a further meeting for the 8th. November - invitations were duelly circulated with adequate time allowed and this time 20 individuals arrived for a further meeting.

It will be noted that the oleagenous Gollom had in fact sent to the meeting, just as were sent Hitler youth & Brown Shirts to disrupt meetings, this time it was the faintly ridiculous Ian Jonathan Smith (telephone number: 01842 - 861 980 chek with him if you like) supported by Herbie Hitt like Mutt & Jeff they set about their task but increasingly they showed they were ill prepared and hadn't much of a clue what they were talkinmg about - the final straw was when Smith made a total pratt of himself by displaying his fantasist theories of how MI5 work - one born every minute!

It was shortly after this that they slunk off unable to answer simple questions.

Interestingly, although most of those present at the first meeting attended, the appologies received were all genuine save one and exceeded the number received at the first meeting. The one was from one odd ball who lacked the courage to admit he had been bullied but chose to claim he had been reading his tea leaves or checking the entrails or some mumbo jumbo as an excuse! PRATT!

Yet again the meeting was well organised and chaired, unlike NEC meetings and after Smith & Hitt grovelled off the meeting continued amicably - though disapointment was registered that the leadership & NEC were too self interested and ill mannered to even acknowledge receip to the earlier declaration and allthough there was a prety strong support for withdrawing support and actively campaigning against UKIP in the interests of British patriotism and values - moderacy prevailed!

Martin Harvey competently steered the meeting to a further approach to the NEC & Leadership though therein IS an implied ultimatum!

It is fortunate that we have friends in the NEC and leadership 'team' and even those who are a part of it. This helps greatly towards keeping members informed of the duplicitous and self serving behaviour of what can only be described as the scum that has seized control.

Just read their eMails and even if you wish to believe their lies and attrocious behaviour - perhaps YOU can justify the collapse in membership, activists, branches and votes not to mention the lack opf funds or funders, the near silence of 2 embarrassed Peers and the burgeoning number of Court cases and investigations by Police, OLAF, Data Protection & others.

----- Original Message -----
From: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com
To:
nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu ; Massa Nigel
ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk ; Puppet Chairman Paul NuttAll
shawforddavid@hotmail.com ; Dr. David Abbott
alanbown@btinternet.com ; Alan Bown
del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; Delboy Young
Jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; Jill Seymour
eric.edmond@tiscali.co.uk ; Dr. Eric Edmond
dcbdcbuk@yahoo.co.uk ; David Bannerman or his 'claimed' Daddy's Desk!
rjoxley@lineone.net ; Rachel Oxley - legal adviser to the NEC & Leadership
mazuckerman@bensonmazure.co.uk ; Ma Zucherman of Bent & Manure - idiot!
douglas.denny@btopenworld.com ; Douglas Denny, serial liar and proven corrupt
cgill36@hotmail.co.uk ; Christopher Gill who has brought shame on his name & reputation & should know better
lisa.duffy2@tesco.jet Lisa Duffy who has no place on the NEC having clearly cheated to get there - without morality or integrity.

Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 7:58 PM

Subject: Newmarket Declaration.

Further to my e-mail sent to you at the end of September that included the Newmarket Declaration, a second meeting was held last Saturday, the 8th November, as had been suggested by those that attended the September meeting.
After considerable discussion, it was agreed to send to you all, the following request;


Newmarket 8th November 2008


Having submitted the ‘Newmarket Declaration’ to the Leadership with no satisfactory response, we formally request that before the 29th November 2008, we have a meeting with the UKIP Leader and other members of the Leadership, whereby the situation could be resolved properly and amicably.
We resent the implication that we are disloyal to the basic principles of our Party.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above sent by e-mail 10-11-08 on behalf of the supporters of the Newmarket Declaration.
Martin Harvey.

Already lies, distortions and abuse are being put in place to destroy the honest men and women who signed this declaration.

Filth like Bannerman will scrape the bottom of the barrel aided by the chavs that are acting as bully boys and enforcers - it is all so similar to Germany in the inter war years but due to arrogance, hubris and ineptitude this shower in EUkip's leadership played their hand badly and orchestrated their 'Reichstag Fire' moment when they had too weak a hand and insufficient competent crooks trained and are now reliant on idiots to carry it through motivated only by their own greed.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

#118* - The Betrayal of the Branches, The Members & Democracy (01)

#118* - The Betrayal of the Branches, The Members & Democracy (01)

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip's LEADERS BETRAYAL OF BRANCHES, MEMBERS & DEMOCRACY?

Hi,

This meeting called by Branch Chairman Martin Harvey, who I understand unequivocally confirmed that his associate Michael McGough who stood in the farcical selection scam corruptly orchestrated by EUkip's leadership based on lies and dishonesty - Michael McGough clearly claimed in his election statement that he was the elected PPC for EUkip in Harlow which is a lie he failed both to appologise for and also to correct.

The notice of the meeting called by Martin Harvey in the Eastern Region was widely known and attended by around 25 people, I understand, however there were 21 eligible voters representing 21 different Constituencies.

The meeting was civil, well mannered, well organised and I understand well chaired

(not a bit like an NEC meeting then!)

The subject matter was I understand debated and a form of wording agreed for a clear message to EUkip's leadership and NEC.

This has subsequently been named 'The Newmarket Declaration' and I have fortunately been supplied with a copy, together with a covering note, by a friend of democracy with access to a relevant EUkip computer.

I do hope that the friends of UKIP and the intentions of the Grass Roots of the party to campaign to leave the EU are making sure that they not only delete the copy of the eMail to my associate which is forwarded to me are removed from the >SENT<>Deleted< box - this will further make it difficult for the corrupt and venal leadership, NEC and their lakeys from confirming who are my intermediaries and also which members are supplying me direct from the EU.

Just a warniong as the level of lies being spread around about me are escallating to protect the guilty one must assume - even the Foul Mouthed slut Annabelle Fuller surfaced again this evening bobbing to the surface like something unwholesome in a septic tank.

I undersatand she is likely to be hauled in for questioning for the criminal breech of The Data Protection Act - implausible as her nonsense about taxi drivers and Morocco seemed to all but Wittaker who ill advisedly signed the letter - I wonder when he is asked to sign his witness statement in his defence as the then Chairman whether he will be as happy to attest to the version of events he put his name to originally.

I digress a little.

To return to 'The Newmarket Declaration':
I append a copy below Martin Harvey's polite request to the NEC members and Farage's puppet chair - frequently to be sat upon no doubt!

Make of it what you will and when the answer comes to hand I will publish that also.

----- Original Message -----

From: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com
To: ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk ; shawforddavid@hotmail.com ; alanbown@btinternet.com ; del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; eric.edmond@tiscali.co.uk ; eric_edmond@hotmail.com

Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:21 PM
Subject: UKIP 2008.

Dear Mr Nuttall, and NEC members,

Last Saturday 27th September, there was a meeting in Newmarket of UKIP Activists from the Eastern Counties, chaired by myself, Martin Harvey. I am chairman of the Broxbourne and Harlow UKIP branch.

The agenda was a positive one to do with campaigning for maximum effect at all elections. After the first two agenda items had been completed, I realised that the problems within the Party were dominating the discussion, and a vote was taken that determined that the problems be debated in order to clear the air so that usual business could continue.

The ensuing debate produced a declaration that received unanimous support from the meeting, and I set out that declaration below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Newmarket Declaration.

At a meeting of Eastern Counties Branch Chairmen representing twenty one Constituencies, Branch Officers and Members, at Newmarket on 27th September 2008,
The following points were resolved;

The Eastern Counties regional committee is constituted contrary to its own binding rules, therefore its decisions since its inception, including the MEP selection process, have been and `are unlawful.

The dissolution of the existing committee and the establishment of a new committee in accordance with UKIP rules, be effected forthwith.

That such election be overseen by an impartial independent body.

We note seriously the grave reservations of Piers Merchant, in his official capacity as official returning Officer about the conduct of the Eastern Counties Selection Proceedures.
Newmarket 27th September 2008.

Over a month later and after an NEC meeting EUkip's sordid claque in leadership have NOT responded but I do hear that there is likely to be expulsion from the party of some who signed the document!

You will appreciate that Nigel Farage & his sordid claque of low lifes orchestrated their 'Reichstag Fire' moment at the NEC on the third and are currently following the example of Adolf Hitler this event has given rise to their equivallent of an 'Enabling Act' the achievement of which has been celebrated by several of the plotters by way of 'washail' and I understand that a celebratory dinner is on the cards as the plot rolls forward.

Already there have been limited Kangaroo Courts and ambush procedures - these have been reliant on abuse of the spirit of the Constitution - one is surprised as a Jew Michael Zucherman being a Practicing Solicitor (at the moment!) has been happy and enthusiastic in his persuit of this plot in the position of Party Secretary - a position in which he is woefully in remiss of duty - it would seem his orgasmic salivations at the very scent of rising up the prospective MEP list if he can engineer the ousting of Gerard Button & Ralp Attkinson during the 'Kristall Nacht' period has overcome him.

We understand that there will be a period of flagrant abuse of the residual constitution that was so evicerated by the inept OR dishonest actions of Michael Zucherman, already the Disciplinary Committee would seem to have been disenfranchised! Next no doubt the full benefits of the 'Reichstag Fire' moment will be exploited and the Constitution itself subsumed by the new dictatorial powers of the elite!

Draw your own conclusions since YOUR morality is a matter for me - however I have no need of Polls to tell me how to act with integrity, in a moral, fair and decent way. I stand by my morality and my judgement.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

#117* - The EUkip Filth & The Edmond Kangaroo Court (01)

#117* - The EUkip Filth & The Edmond Kangaroo Court (01)

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!



MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S UNDERHAND CORRUPTION!

Hi,

you may well have read my earlier blog or my eMail Newsletter, in which I stated that I was in receipt, from someone closely associated with EUkip’s sordid leadership claque the text regarding their planned Kangaroo court hearing, which was to be a part of Nigel Farage’s Reichstag Fire moment – engineered it would seem to try to give a corrupt cabal amongst the leadership the excuse to seize draconian power.

Still in the rather foolish belief that amongst that which had floated to the top of the EUkip septic tank might be something of decency & morality, with some understanding of British values and Justice! – I refrained from publishing the vindictive and vile compilation trumped up against Dr. Eric Edmond by the undeniably dishonest, fraud and liar David Bannerman, no doubt in obeisance to his venal and vile master and their corrupt associates.

I now publish below the full text as shamefully drawn up by the sad failure Bannerman and endorsed by the proven corrupt NEC only one of whom spoke out in disgust at this behaviour, Drs. Abbott & Edmond having already left in disgust, disassociating themselves from the undeniably dishonest and corrupt behaviour boasted of by the sleazy drunken womaniser Nigel Farage. Farage had admitted, seemingly with no realisation of the enormity of his actions, that he had set-up and tricked one of UKIP’s most loyal and decent long term supporters Martin Hasslam, who has so consistently given generously of his money and hugely of his expertise and time (in the misguided belief that supporting this evil that is EUkip of today was, in some way, patriotic!).

It is unlikely that anyone of integrity will not see through the disgusting lack of morality in this so called ‘Submission For Disciplinary Action’, drawn up by the discredited David Bannerman as the first in a series of reprehensible kangaroo courts.

Bannerman was supported in his dishonesty by Farage’s self seeking puppet, the odious NuttAll parachuted in unelected as a ‘Puppet Chairman’, when Dr. Wittacker’s disgust at the dishonesty of the NEC finally boiled over and he quit – the last straw it seems was being forced to sign a letter claiming the foul mouthed Annabelle Fuller had resigned and the pack of implausible lies about taxi drivers and Morocco peddled to cover for her criminality!

Read on – there is a huge amount more yet to come:

STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

A SUBMISSION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION
AGAINST DR ERIC EDMOND

Presented on request of the NEC for discussion at the
November NEC meeting

Introduction

The NEC has the power under the Party Constitution to expel or suspend a member of the NEC for 'unbecoming conduct' under Articles 7.18.4. The intention of this clause is to exclude any NEC member who behaves in such a way as consistently to disrupt the NEC and prevent it from conducting its business in a proper, efficient and orderly manner. This ongoing conduct thereby proves him or herself to be unfit to continue as an NEC member.

By offering Dr Edmond the opportunity to speak at the last NEC and by deferring discussion of the matter to a future NEC, and by providing a copy of this paper in advance to Dr Edmond, the NEC has sought to act reasonably and fairly under the Constitution.

The motion agreed at the 8th September NEC was: "That in view of the indication by Dr Edmond that he wished to have the opportunity to prepare to meet any charges against him, and in view of representations by various NEC members that they wish to have the opportunity of putting forward their own complaints against Dr Edmond, David Campbell Bannerman was invited to prepare a submission for disciplinary action against Dr Edmond under clause 7.18 of the constitution to be heard at the next NEC meeting and with proper notice of at least 7 days being given to Dr Edmond of the content of that submission.”

1. The Charge of ‘Unbecoming Conduct’ Against Dr Eric Edmond, with supporting evidence.

The majority view of the NEC is that Dr Eric Edmond has been a consistently disruptive influence on the NEC since he was elected, and that his behaviour needs to improve markedly if he is able to continue as an NEC member. The facts show a clear pattern of disruptive and abusive behaviour, and of contempt for the NEC and its members. This is clear from the evidence cited below:

1.1 Threats to go outside the NEC, and support for police action

Dr Edmond has made serious threats against the NEC. For example, he said in

an e mail of 25th July "If you persist in this I will have to seek remedies outside the NEC."

Dr Edmond supported John West's recurring attacks on UKIP, including seeming to encourage unjustified attempts to instigate police action against the party. In his e mail of 13th August he says to John West and John Whittaker "I urge him to do so as quickly as possible so the police can get on with their investigation as quickly as possible".

1.2 Aggressive personal behaviour

Even at his first NEC, on 7th April, Dr Edmond engaged in an aggressive attack on the Leader and his style of leadership. He again attacked Nigel Farage at the 14th July NEC regarding Nigel's use of the Political Committee for political decisions (despite this being made clear as its purpose in the Constitution, and owing to a need to make quick political decisions). Mr Farage explained forcefully that the reason was a lack of trust in the NEC owing to past leaks.

Dr Edmond also engaged in attacks also on Douglas Denny at 14th July NEC, calling him an "idiot", when Mr Denny objected to Edmond's slanderous remarks against Christopher Gill (see below).

In an e mail to Douglas Denny of 2nd September, Edmond rudely says. "you are raving again." This was in response to Mr Denny making reasonable comments which ended in the observation: "All I have seen so far, is a constant tirade [by Dr Edmond] against the "leadership" of UKIP and what appears to be deliberate disruption and promotion of discord in the NEC. What is your agenda ? It does not appear to me to be what you told the membership." and in an e mail of 4th September from Edmond, "your reply is rubbish". As Lisa Duffy made clear in her e mail of 28th September: "The only angry raised voice has been Dr Edmond".

1.3 Bringing the Party into disrepute, by writing to a body UKIP is
engaged in a legal dispute with, to make wild and damaging accusations

Dr Edmond has written to the Electoral Commission in the middle of a legal case against the party by that same organisation.

He wrote to Mr Franks of the Electoral Commission on 10th September saying: "I gather you are the investigating officer in charge of investigating alleged financial improprieties at UKIP with a case currently under judicial review. I was expelled from UKIP NEC on Monday. I am deeply concerned about my financial liabilities as while on the NEC party officials stone walled over answering questions on financial matters and in one case gave a completely untruthful answer.

“I copy to you my letter to the residual NEC as record of the date and content of my request for financial information as UKIP leaders usually ignore awkward but important questions. I am not sure who legally is currently chairman of UKIP Whittaker or Nuttall as the Monday meeting was improperly convened but Whittaker seemed to chairing the meeting."

He also claimed in his e mail of 10th September "I will of course also be seeking guidance from the Electoral Commission as to the propriety of all financial and other transactions made during my term of office".

It is difficult to accept that Dr Edmond has the interests of the party at stake when he acts this way. He was seeking to do major damage to the cause of UKIP. This alone is enough for a complaint to the disciplinary committee.

1.4 Slanderous Comments made against Christopher Gill at the NEC meeting of 14th July 2008

At the 14th July meeting, Eric Edmond challenged the suitability of Christopher Gill to act as Returning Officer, given that as a Tory MP "he did not even make it as a PUSy (Parliamentary Under Secretary)", the lowest grade of Minister. He did this despite the fact that Christopher Gill was not present at the meeting, and therefore not able to defend himself.

Nigel Farage said that this remark was not nice, and below the belt, as many MPs are not just in Parliament for Ministerial positions and serve their constituencies well.

Eric retorted that no, "it is due to a lack of talent".

David Campbell Bannerman commented that this remark was slanderous, and urged Dr Edmond to withdraw it. He refused to do so. Douglas Denny said it was actionable.

At the subsequent NEC of 8th September, Mr Campbell Bannerman inquired whether Dr Edmond had apologised subsequently to Christopher Gill, and Christopher confirmed no such apology had been received.

At that NEC, Dr Edmond claimed that he had not made the remarks, but many members of the NEC commented that he was wrong, and that they had a clear recollection that these remarks were made, as stated.

Whilst fair criticism is of course acceptable, this kind of unpleasant and libellous abuse in front of Christopher Gill's peer group, and without him present to defend himself, is not acceptable conduct by an NEC member.

1.5 Breaches of NEC confidentiality

Dr Edmond has broken strict NEC confidentiality rules. For example, in an e mail of 13th August to Robin Page, Dr Edmond reported: "I have expressed my
dis-satisfaction with this to our leader but he replied the NEC leaked so much he could only have people he could trust on his Political Committee." This was a discussion at an NEC meeting and was confidential to that meeting. NEC rules clearly state that breach of confidentiality can lead to instant dismissal from
the NEC.

Yet Dr Edmond also displays rather a contempt for confidentiality. In his e mail of 30th September he dismisses breaches of NEC confidentiality as "unproven" and to raise such concerns as an "allegation that smears us all". This is despite consistent evidence of leaks - as Rachel Oxley states in her e mail of 30th September, "It really is stating the obvious to say the e mail correspondence of the NEC is being passed on as we see our comments reproduced in part or in full in the e mail circulation list of Greg Lance Watkins and on Anthony Butcher's forum."

1.6 Support for a disruptive attempt by John West to sit on the NEC

Eric Edmond encouraged John West to believe he had a right to sit on
the NEC, even though there is no 'ladder' system in operation for the NEC
(leading to the next highest voted candidate taking a free place) and there was no vacancy, as confirmed by an NEC discussion and vote on 8th September. As a result John West was sitting in at the NEC meeting on 8th September and had subsequently to be asked to leave, as he had no right to be there.

Dr Edmond at the NEC denied he had encouraged West to attend, yet he supported his case at the NEC of 8th September and in his e mail of 30th August, he said: "UKIP Constitution requires 12 elected members. There are currently only 11. John West, the 5th placed person in the last NEC election therefore should be on the NEC. Can you please send him an invite to this effect ?" and in his email of 31st August he argued: "John West has a democratic mandate to fill our vacant NEC slot.. but he is democratically entitled to sit on the NEC."

This was done without the courtesy of checking the rules with the Party Secretary nor discussing the matter with the Party Chairman, and was done in an aggressive manner. This is the comment made to a former Party Secretary Douglas Denny in e mail of 1st September: "If you persist in trying to thwart the democratic process you make us the same as the EU" and another of same date where he says "it is silly for you to try and deny democratic process for Mr West and invoke it for your own ends."


Latterly, he has compounded his abusive approach by calling in an email of 20th. September for the Party Leader to be barred from the NEC owing to an OLAF inquiry, the Deputy Leader to resign, for John West to take his place, and with an attack on the Treasurer and MEP Candidate Marta Andreasen.

1.7 A recurrent attempt to undermine faith in the MEP selection process

Eric Edmond is entitled to his views and to criticise the conduct of Party business or the MEP selection process as an NEC member. However, his conduct goes way beyond a legitimate holding to account.

Eric Edmond has supported every single complainant regarding MEP selection in his e mails with enthusiasm - John West, Robin Page, Lynnda Robson, Gerard Batten, Victor Webb, Chris Hudson, Rollo Reid.

He makes grossly exaggerated claims in an e mail of 19th August that "This is the latest in a succession of allegations of improprieties in the MEP election process. We have a situation where rules and due process are being ignored at all levels of the party, emails from NEC members to those involved in running the election are not replied to, legal actions are in progress and someone who were told had resigned for an unforgivable breach of confidence is now allegedly back performing the same functions but with a murky contractual relationship with UKIP. A general state of anarchy prevails and the leadership produce no evidence to the NEC to support their actions. I support your call for to scrap the election... (and for) an emergency NEC." The vast majority of regions and candidates have been satisfied with the process, even where their ambitions have been sadly disappointed, and yet Dr Edmond seeks to stop, destroy and invalidate the entire process.

Factually, Edmond ignored the guidance regarding closing dates and did not bother to confirm this with the party before stirring the issue up outside the NEC.

In an e mail of 15th August he claims "Messrs Page & West seem to have a strong prima facie case that there were not given fair treatment in our MEP selection process and I request this be put on the NEC agenda for discussion at our Sept meeting. Page's case seems to be strong as UKIP did extend the closing date for nominations in Wales and possibly other regions as well. West's case is also strong and potentially far more damaging as it has elements of malicious intent." Never did he acknowledge that West had clearly libelled Jeffrey Titford MEP, Stuart Gulleford and the Deputy Leader in advance of his YouTube posting (and which was not at all acceptable), nor that West had even gone to the police to make these false accusations.

Even after notice of disciplinary action was given, Dr Edmond was still unquestionably supporting Mr West. In an e mail of 28th September, Edmond says, "John West has not used any foul language and addressed the NEC in mild
and moderate language." John West never "addressed" the NEC, he was merely asked why he was attending the meeting, and then asked to leave whilst this was discussed. Dr Edmond further claimed in his e mail of 29th September that a firm but polite response from Douglas Denny to continued harassment by email by West was "offensive and threatening".

This support is despite the fact that West’s malicious charges to the Essex police have been formally dismissed as having no substance whatsoever.

Then Edmond enthusiastically embraces Victor Webb's complaints. In a 20th September e mail about Victor Webb he proclaims "He seems to me to have a prima facie case for a complaint", asking the Chairman to have Mr Webb at the NEC in person, as he did with John West.

An e mail of 30th July attacks the South West process, stating that "Rollo Reid, the chairman of the nearby Christchurch branch and one of our best activists was not selected as an MEP candidate whilst Julie Harrison, Graeme Booth's niece who had only been in the party one week according to the SWCC figures was selected ! I pointed out to the SWCC at which 3 members of the selection committee were present how demoralising this decision would be for our activists. Was Mr Gill party to this decision ?".

As early as 11th June Dr Edmond was declaring in an e mail that "I heard a rumour that the £250 MEP nomination fee had been waived for some candidates. As a candidate myself I have an obvious interest. Do you know if there is any truth in this rumour?"

And at the NEC meeting on 9th June, Edmond supported the issue of the Fenland branch and Len Baynes, who had attacked the Regional Organiser for Eastern, Peter Reeve, and which they had unfairly tried to deselect as a Prospective Parliamentary Candidate.

As for the selection process, Dr Edmond raised a motion at the NEC of 14th July for the South West demanding the region has its own, independent voting system using the Electoral Reform Society, claiming people have "a lack of faith in the integrity in voting on MEP candidates". This was despite the fact no other region has requested a different voting process, and that the Returning Officer Piers Merchant is not only known to be very fair but is from the South West himself. Edmond also boasted of disrespect for the Deputy Leader from some in the South West. The motion was defeated.

Dr Edmond did attend the MEP vote count at Head Office in person and sought to test the voting system there, only to find that the device he used proved the process was robust and the results exactly the same as his.

1.8 Inconsistent and inaccurate public statements

Dr. Edmond has made a number of inaccurate statements, within the NEC and outside of it. As cited above, he insisted he did not make slanderous statements about Christopher Gill, when this was raised at the 8th September meeting, even though this was the clear recollection of the majority of NEC members.

Even after the disciplinary warning Dr Edmond has continued to make a series of inaccurate statements as to the facts whilst regularly claiming "I just tell the truth" (in his e mail of 28th September). His version of events once again is at complete odds with the recollection of the majority of the NEC, which he consistently denies. In his email of 28th September, for example, he says:
"Your statements... about what happened at the 8th Sept NEC are highly misleading and distort the truth".

Dr Edmond claimed at the 8th September NEC itself that it "was not a properly constituted meeting of the NEC" and that the new Chairman was not authorised by the NEC, even though the Party Leader had explained he had called and had agreement from a required number of NEC members before the Party Conference announcement.

Dr Edmond has also claimed several times, including to outside audiences, that he was "illegally expelled" from the NEC when he had not been. But in spite of this, in his e mails of 20 September he asks to be placed on the NEC agenda 5 items, which he is only entitled to do as an NEC member, and asking for NEC seconders.

This inconsistent position is amplified in his e mail of 28th September, where he again claims that "there is no doubt in my mind, to Delroy Young or the listeners outside that I was expelled from the NEC."

Lisa Duffy clearly records the accurate and majority view of the events in her e mail of 11th September, "Once you were back in the room John Whittaker then informed you of the motion put forward and asked you if you would like to address the meeting in response. Dr Edmond I clearly recall that you said No John I would not, I am going to leave the meeting and prepare my defence and speak to my legal team in Freshfields. At NO point were you expelled or suspended from the NEC. At this present time you remain an elected member of the NEC and your response will be heard at the next NEC meeting."

Douglas Denny recalls in his e mail of 10th September "I remember well your voluntary leaving of the NEC meeting - which I highlighted to the members of the meeting when it occurred. You were in a position to engage in the proceedings, which you refused. Despite your refusal, you are being given further reasonable time and dispensation to engage in this issue I understand."

Rachel Oxley made similar observations in an e mail of 12th September:

“The circumstance of Dr Edmonds' leaving the NEC meeting on Monday 8th September are exactly as described by Lisa Duffy, Christopher Gill and Doug Denny. It was his express wish to leave in order to obtain legal advice before giving the NEC his response... Doug Denny remarked that Dr Edmonds had left the meeting of his own volition as he felt that it should be noted. The Forum frequented by some UKIP members and former members contains a rather different version- in which the NEC behaved disgracefully in expelling him etc."

She added further comments in an 22 September e mail: "It is interesting, isn't it, that Dr Edmonds should suggest agenda items and propose motions for our next meeting despite his having personally informed at least one British Democracy Poster (Sponplague) that he is no longer on the NEC, following his alleged 'expulsion'. He appears to be wanting to have his cake and eat it too, in gaining the sympathy & kudos that his alleged shoddy treatment by the NEC will bring, whilst still wishing to dominate the agenda."

This is in contrast to claiming he was "asked to leave the NEC by Chairman John Whittaker" in an e mail of 20th September, and in a 10th September e mail declaiming "my outrageous, unjustified and illegal expulsion from the NEC".

1.9 Unreasonable demands for unrelated information

In his e mail of 10th September, Dr Edmond demands a range of documents, said to be for his legal defence as to his proposed expulsion, but which have nothing to do with the charge of 'unbecoming conduct'. They include details of the Party's financial transactions April to September 2008, issues around Alan Bown's court case constituting a further donation, and financial donations from the Ramsgate Call Centre for 2007/08. These demands he then copies to the Electoral Commission, to cause further trouble.

Proposed Motion to the NEC

In conclusion, in light of this evidence of unbecoming conduct by Dr Eric Edmond as an NEC member, the following motion is put to the next NEC on 3rd November 2008:

MOTION:

‘That in the light of Dr Eric Edmond’s unbecoming conduct as an NEC member, both during NEC meetings and through relevant e mails and other communications, that under Article 7.18.4 of the UKIP Constitution, Eric Edmond be suspended immediately as a member of the NEC, and remain suspended for the next three NEC meetings post the 3rd November NEC meeting. After that suspension period, Dr Edmond will be allowed to reapply to attend future NEC meetings, but will only be accepted back after a majority decision of the NEC and by Dr Edmond providing a suitable written undertaking to behave in a responsible and dignified manner during NEC meetings and through his other UKIP activities. Any breach of that undertaking would lead to the automatic and immediate resumption of his suspension from the NEC, through a further motion.’

I doubt readers of ANY integrity will be astonished to note not just the fundamental dishonesty of Bannerman in drawing up this rather childish and indubitably vicious attack - There is something skin crawlingly similar in the behaviour displayed by Bannerman & his supporters to William Golding's 'Lord of The Flies' but with Kafkaesque overtones of 'The Trial'.

How any honest man could accuse Dr. Eric Edmond of 'Bringing EUkip Into Disrepute' in the light of the serial shamefull behaviour of EUkip's leadership and NEC - much of which has been exposed in the media:

Drunken, Racial Abuse, Abuse of The Data Protection Act, Assault, Adultery, Consorting with Prostitutes, Fraud, Embezelling, Money Laundering, Lies, Dishonesty, Failures of Accounting, Lack of Probity, Lack of Transparency, Hypocracy etc. etc.

Then we note that in terms of 'Bringing EUkip Into Disrepute' David Bannerman himself has colluded in & profitted from corrupt elections and has for many years lied on a serial basis about his 'so called' ancestry and fraudulently and dishonestly gained his present appointment based on undeniable lies, fraud and his claimed Father's ownership of a desk!

It is astonishing that the ONLY member of the NEC to seek Justice and Honesty with the integrity to and courage to speak out was Delboy Young - It is not that I am astonished at Del's integrity and courage, it is that I am disgusted at the lack of integrity and corruption of all others who were present, who have thus heaped ordure on their own heads and indubitably 'Brought EUkip into Disrepute'.

I am particulary astonished that Christopher Gill once a Tory MP so demeaned himself and brought shame on his head after an otherwise honourable if lack lustre contribution to Justice and Democracy over many years - it would seem that even on reflection his conscience has not caused him to speak out in the face of such evil - Shame on Christopher Gill who at least should have set some example to these sordid people.

I shall be returning to this Kangaroo Court that is clearly something of a Kristall Nacht with its false flagged lies so very redollent of The Reichstag Fire used by Hitler to seize absolute control and set aside The Constitution as it is clear Farage's Brown Shirts are so pliantly doing to their eternal shame, as they selectively and out of context quote people and the Rule Book.

I shall address the shame of each and every paragraph, in the context of the eMails quoted and those who bear false witness. I shall also address the shameful behaviour one at a time of each and every individual present and participating in this revolting witch hunt.

I shall also, at my convenience, publish a recording I hold of the NEC - most likely together with other damning material in the run up to the EUropean Elections of June 2009 - to ensure that these United Kingdoms are never again represented by such shamefull people or disgusting acts.

Should you doubt these people are that evil just read my posting #116* if you read nothing else.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

#116* - Gollom's Tarnished Pressssiousssss!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

#116* - Gollom's Tarnished Pressssiousssss!


MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S UNDERHAND INCOMPETENCE!

Hi,

Gollom, yet again, excels himself as he slithers around duplicitous as ever – an unpleasant and cowardly creep always ready to do something in his own interest.

He has proved in the past to have the honour and integrity of a snake and the personality of a stoat. Both untrustworthy and vicious in his self interest – willing to mislead and back stab along with the rest of that which has floated to the top of the septic tank of EUkip politics.

By the way – thanks to my source who mailed these eMails to me through a third party, after a brief conversation – How these eMails were floating around outside of Gollom & The Reeve’s Region is difficult to trace, fortunately ;-)

Anyway – make of this what you will and I will, not un-naturally, interject ;-)

It is to be hoped that this takes little clarification as on my first skim reading I was disgusted at the depths these odious people will sink to to stab each other in the back.

We MUST SOOOOOO HOPE they are never elected as their duplicity and willingness to corrupt common morality is so redollent of the methods of The National Socialist Movement of Germany – as they used witch hunts and intimidation – first interpreting their Constitution to suit their aims and seizing control of the levers of power – it was after Kristall Nacht that The Reichstag Fire was exploited, just as is the crass imitation so badly bungled by Farage’s evil claque of last Monday, is being used.

Right down to the flexing of muscles by his bully boys and the willingness of the old and the weak to fall in line.

EUkip’s own version of the horrors of the build up to war and the persecution of the honest is of course but a pathetic imitation but no less evil for all that!

Ladies and Gentlemen are you not ashamed that you stand by and permit this evil to take place under your noses and with your acquiescence?

Look closely at the tone of the eMails that follow and consider them in the context of Farage’s Reichstag Fire moment engineered with care last Monday – yet accidentally exposed by my earlier predictions and the astonishing fact that AllAboutUkip Blog posted the outcome of the NEC meeting seemingly before it commenced and The BNP had posted the details before the NEC meeting ended!

Even that early Clive Page from EUkip’s Press Office was spinning to keep up – TRYING to imply there was no connection between Farage’s corrupt dealings and the shoddy attempt to link his BNP based Reichstag Moment to the kangaroo Court dismissal of Dr. Abbott without defence or warning and Dr. Edmond who had been told that he was not allowed to defend himself, from 9 pages of trumped up drivel from the liar, cheat and fraud David Bannerman.

The old grass roots honest UKIP members must be so ashamed to be associated with such shamefull behaviour from the bully boys!

----- Original Message -----

From the unelected enforcer instructing Farage’s puppet Reeve how to distort Justice to dishonestly seize control:

Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:02:30 +0000
From: gensec@ukip.org
To: ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk; reeve@ukip.org
Subject: Open letter as discussed on phone - Should that read ‘PLOTTED’?

To whom it may concern:

However it would SEEM that the victim is even yet not informed, as clearly a kangaroo court functions best when the target is surprised by the events ‘PLANNED’ for them!

On 12th August, at a Committee Meeting of the Suffolk Coastal branch, a vote was taken to expel John West from all branch activities of the Suffolk Coastal branch.

The Committee Meeting was called without warning, only members likely to acquiesce to corruption were invited (Resignations were resultant from honest men of integrity!).

The victim John West was dishonourably ambushed by the corrupt Chairman acting in collusion with the bully boy Reeve – an individual without morality, integrity or value to our Country as he has no understanding of Justice or decent values – but favoured as one of the new crooks determined to form the new Brown Shirts!

The branch had the authority to do this by way of rescinding the agreement of the branch under Article 2.3 of the Branch & Constituency Association Rules March 2008, which states that:

Even the lowest of such scum does not pore over the rules AFTER the event to find duplicitous ways to justify their dishonest and corrupt behaviour.

Party members may, on request, become a member of another branch, subject to the agreement of the receiving branch committee.

Even having acted in this despicable way they are having to dishonestly go against the spirit of their own law to justify their odious actions.

Since John West does not reside in the area covered by Suffolk Coastal branch, rescinding this agreement required the appointment of a new temporary secretary for Suffolk Coastal branch. Mrs. Larter stepped into the vacancy temporarily.

I understand John West – who clearly has more morality in his little finger than is shared by the sordid claque that have by their actions brought EUkip into disrepute – Whitmore is, for his own gain, acting with liars and cowards like George Curtis and Andrew Smith who I gather will be used as the scapegoat for Farage’s crass handling, with him, that would seem likely to cost EUkip between £500,000 and £1,000,000 by their irresponsible and dishonest behaviour.

The meeting was unlawfully constituted, without agenda or notice. The claimed interpretation of the Constitution is bunkum on ANY interpretation of decency or Justice and counter any British values of integrity.

The reason given by the branch for taking this action was that it was felt John West had breached Article 4.5 of the UKIP Constitution, which states that:

"Members shall accept the Party's constitution and rules made in accordance with this constitution and do nothing to undermine the reputation of the Party or to bring the Party into public disrepute. Nor shall they act in a manner intended to cause, or actually causing, damage to the Party's interests including by breaching confidentiality."

Thus these duplicitous bully boys show their dishonesty – he stands accused under one rule they managed to find, but is brutalised and ambushed under another – Shame on these evil people that are tying to hijack the Party.

This was in relation to public allegations that John West had made against the UKIP MEP for the Eastern Counties, which were proven to be unfounded.

This is to my certain knowledge untrue, false and a lie - as I have spoken with the Police Inspector. I also spoke with the Police Inspector regarding the breech of The Data Protection Act and also with The Data Protection Agency as a complainant. I understand from associates that Mr. West has also spoken with them in detail.

John West was not happy to accept this branch decision.

One can not be surprised that an honest man seeks to uphold honest principles in the face of corruption of any sense of due process.

Accordingly, the matter was referred to the Regional Organiser, who was present at the meeting of 12th August as a guest of the branch to discuss campaign activities.

Clearly a lie as he changed his own story twice and neither was in accord with the spin put about by Whitmore!

This referral took place under Article 7.1 of the Branch & Constituency Association Rules, March 2008, which states:

Let us hope there are enough honest members left in EUkip to see through this intimidatory twaddle.

"Instances may arise when differences within a branch threaten its proper functioning. Every effort shall be made to resolve these at the local level, either by the branch committee or at a full meeting of the branch. If this does not succeed, the dispute shall be referred to the regional organiser, acting on behalf of the Party Chairman." In upholding the branch decision, Peter Reeve was therefore acting on the Chairman's behalf.

Clearly Peter Reeve had driven some 100 miles to act as an enforcer in bullying through this duplicitous and underhand behaviour.

It is becoming clear that together with the lies and dishonesty of the leadership election, the dishonesty of the placement of Duffy & others on the NEC, the openly published Returning Officer’s report of corruption in the selection of candidates and the criminal cases being brought in the Courts by the Judicial Review, the Data Protection Agency, The Data Protection Commissioner, OLAF, The British Police and even claims in The Small Claims Courts.

John West further alleges that the branch has a duty to hold an Annual General Meeting, claiming that this currently falls due. Article 4.2.1 of the Branch & Constituency Association Rules, March 2008, states that:

"The Party's year ends on 31st December. The AGM shall normally be held between 1 January and 31 March and between 10 and 14 months after the preceding AGM."

Which clearly this abuse of the constitution has failed to take into account as we can be certain the manipulation by the Brown Shirts fails to address the period exceeding 14 months in direct contravention of the rules they seek to abuse.

Since the primary motivation in the rules for the date of the AGM is that it should take place after the end of the party's financial year, it is the view of Suffolk Coastal branch committee that it is reasonable to delay the Annual General Meeting of Suffolk Coastal branch until January 2009.

It is clearly not the view of the Suffolk Costal Branch duely elected Secretary, whose duty it is to uphold the Constitution that the dishonest bully boys are seeking to kick down, to suit their grubby interests!

As Party Chairman, I am convinced that the proper procedures have been applied by Suffolk Coastal branch. Accordingly, I have made the following decisions:

As Farage’s Puppet it is clear that as so often stated EUkip like fish is rotting from the head down – this is the man who so badly chaired the NEC meeting that the Police had to be called to restore order last Monday (3rd.)!

A shaven headed Liverpool Scally utterly out of his depth unable to control the braying of his own immature and irresponsible claque on the NEC of EUkip.

1. That Suffolk Coastal branch has acted in accordance with the UKIP Constitution and Branch & Constituency Association rules March 2008 in removing John West from his position as Branch Secretary.

If this is your opinion Nuttall clearly you are unfit for office as it is the decision of a small time nebbish, dancing for his corrupt and discredited puppet master. Your action brings The EUroSceptic Movement into disrepute and nothing but shame on EUkip.

2. That the Branch secretary of Suffolk Coastal branch is now Mrs. Larter, acting in a temporary capacity until the next AGM of Suffolk Coastal branch.

So this is the first of the provincial show trials! Shame on the sad old Larter that she accepts the position, when better men have resigned it leaves only the scum!

3. That Suffolk Coastal branch should hold its AGM in January 2009.

Are we to understand that Farage’s hapless little puppet is acting as Gaulleiter with Dictatorial authority in breech of EUkip’s Constitution and any moral concepts of natural Justice?

Yours faithfully,

Paul Nuttall (UKIP Party Chairman)

Nuttall your low life behaviour and lack of morality may be acceptable in the gutters you frequent but in the real world you have sealed your fate and branded yourself as a dishonourable Chav on the make, for ever more.

Shame on you for such underhand behaviour being used like a throw away nappy by your master.

Your actions are yet again beneath contempt as you move towards the destruction of UKIP which was the hope of many honourable men and women.

----- Original Message -----

From: PETER REEVE
To: DCB ; andrew smith ; stuart gulleford ; george curtis
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:50 PM
Subject: John West no longer Secretary of Suffolk Central.

For Info. We sent notice to the branch today upholding Suffolk Coastal committee's decision to remove John West as their branch secretary. He had since that meeting sent a letter to all members calling an AGM on 25th Nov against the wishes of the branch chairman. Will keep you up to date on this as things occur.

Well done Mr. West at least one person is acting honourably – a course of action clearly that which has floated to the top of EUkip’s septic tank has no cogniscence of – it is interesting to note that a Branch Secretary has legal responsibilities - Just imagine if EUkip had someone elected to office in June 2009 just how they would betray these United Kingdoms.

Interestingly whilst the bully boys went around intimidating people one of my contacts in head office informed me that as far as they were concerned John West was still the Secretary and being mailed as such!

Do you think the chavs are out of control? Just like the Brown Shirts on Kristall Nacht!

I have been asked to contact every suffolk coastal member by phone to confirm our action and explain why they have received the false letter from John West. (as well as asking for donations! LOL)

If you want a lie spread about seek a weak man and bribe him! One wonders if your abilities to fund the Party will be commensurate with your ability to organise the meeting in Capel St. Mary!! Who would fund EUkip other than someone trying to buy position EUkip’s accounts stink and any money will most likely have to be used to pay fines and damages!

Do be minded that as John West has still not been notified (unless he reads my blog) of their filthy underhand coniving he was acting in good faith as Secretary and after many years as a trusted member he has his own list of members accrued whilst working WITH members not for himself and money!

(Note he is still currently Chair of Ipswich North & Suffolk Central branch. - but this at least should solve the problem for Ron Whitmore and get their branch moving forward again & out leafleting) There may be wider implications to John West's actions in contacting these members as he had no right to use the database or the title. Will wait to see what fuss he makes for next step.

Be minded Reeve that unlike you Mr. West was elected you are merely a pawn in a filthy game – a prostitute to Farage & Bannerman’s dishonesty.

Pete Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties

----- Forwarded Message ----

From: Stuart Gulleford ukipeast@intamail.com
Subject: Fw: John West no longer Secretary of Suffolk Central.

It seems that at least some action has been taken!

S (Slime perchance?)

Action that will no doubt please Gollom as he slithers around hated by many and deceiving others.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:LEAVE THE EU

#113* - Eastern Region Septic Tank With Its Lid Off

#113* - Eastern Region Septic Tank With Its Lid Off!!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!


MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S CORRUPTION & FARAGE’S REICHSTAG FIRE!

Hi,

Let us firstly clear the confusion of Peter Reeve the Regional Organiser who is presiding over the collaps of EUkip in the Eastern Region.Fortunately I spotted his eMail in the SPAM dump bin on one of my other computers – normally people who wish to contact me use MY computer rather than posture by mailing other computers.You will note almost all my eMails state my name, address, phone number and eMail address clearly just to give even the thickest of people a clue how to contact me!It seems Peter Reeve is puzzled – thus showing that in any sense of the word he is challenged as a reeve to EUkip!

-----Original Message-----
From: pr.ukip@hotmail.com [mailto:pr.ukip@hotmail.com]
On Behalf Of PETER REEVE
Sent: 08 November 2008 10:52
To: greg.glanceback@
Subject: Lisa Duffy

To Mr Watkins

Please can you provide we with the basis for your statement that Lisa Duffy dishonestly gained her seat on the NEC as in the quote below. This is a very serious allegation which you claim to have distributed to up to 4,000 people on this email alone and have repeated on earlier emails circulated by yourself. "Peter Reeve lives with Lisa Duffy & her children and I gather a few of his – you will note La Duffy dishonestly gained her seat on the NEC"
Quote is from email ref :
From: Glanceback greg.glanceback@
Subject: #1125 - Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!
To: greg.glanceback@
Date: Saturday, 8 November, 2008, 6:30 AM
Regards.Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties

Firstly may I point out that as the Regional Organiser of parts of the Eastern Region, having been de-selected by various branches, being the subject of complaints to the NEC of others and having shown your own duplicity, dishonesty and underhand determination to betray the UKIP members and the public at larger my inclination is to tell you to mind your own business and if one of your superiors wish to question the veracity of my statement it is up to them.

However being aware that Lisa Duffy is a cohabiter of yours may I suggest that you read the EUkip Constitution, crass as it is in many areas having been unprofessionally altered from the original – I appreciate you have scant regard for the Constitution or Party procedural rules, however be minded of ‘the spirit of the law’ when next you read The Constitution.

Be advised that Lisa Duffy obtained her position on the NEC dishonourably and dishonestly and has abused her position and acted dishonestly and dishonourably bringing EUkip yet further into disrepute by her behaviour and her actions.

Your position Mr. Reeve is unconscionable for a man of any integrity, morality or honour.

May I remind you that you are promoting and supporting the undeniably corrupt selection process in your region as shown beyond any possible doubt in the public domain – further you are supporting in office bringing into disrepute both EUkip and the body politic the fraud, liar and cheat David Bannerman.

Is it any wonder that in a society largely opposed to vassal status in the EU amongst an audience of the young and educated at Cambridge EUkip’s position was resoundingly rejected when it fielded the fundamentally flawed and dishonest Mr. Bannerman.Despite leafleting, widespread advertising and a great deal of promotion you will have noted that the EUkip Rally at Capel St. Mary was an unmitigated disaster – having hired a Hall and after all the effort you found out just how popular you are amongst members, despite a claimed membership of 1,770ish in your Region only 10 or 12 were remotely interested in hearing the opinions or views of the corrupt Bannerman or the scams you are paid to uphold!

Interestingly despite the liar and coward George Curtis publishing widely to prevent members meeting, with your assistance – it is noted that on a limited circulation and with little effort – despite yours & the odious George Curtis’s efforts and misrepresentations – some 20 branches were represented from your region.

I note that despite two liars in the audience seemingly planted by the odious Gollom (who has a track record of dishonesty and misrepresentation and is together with his employer Jeffrey Titford under investigation by OLAF with a pending situation by Essex Police).

I appreciate that the rather sad Herbert Hitt had come along to support the lies of Ian Jonathan Smith – but you will have heard they made complete fools of themselves and had to scuttle off with their tails between their legs when they found out they were inadequately and dishonestly briefed.

Peter Reeve your behaviour in upholding dishonesty, presumably for financial gain, is unpatriotic, dishonest, corrupt, dishonourable and damaging to the EUroSceptic movement – that you are unable to work out the ways in which Lisa Duffy dishonestly gained a position on the NEC and has acted dishonourably since comes as no surprise to me.

Whether Lisa Duffy and yourself are in the employ of some agency to work with Bannerman to destroy the EUroSceptic movement or merely useful idiots is of no interest to me – the facts speak for themselves and are clear and they are that EUkip has all but collapsed and the media takes no interest as they are clearly irrelevant – the build up of Court cases all but deliberately incurred by EUkip.

As with the Judicial Review currently reaching culmination with a possible £1,000,000 cost to EUkip and thus to the NEC as bankers of last resort, if Alan Bown refuses to pay having woken up and realised it was deliberately incurred by the lies and stupidity of Andrew Smith (of your Region) and the idiotic Nigel Farage.

I note that this collapse and catastrophic mismanagement, particularly in the Eastern Region is concurrent with yours Lisa Duffy’s & Bannerman’s involvement!!

This tends to speak volumes and it is pretty clear you are being used as useful idiots as I see no signs that you have the collective intelligence worth trying to train to do the job!

The damage done to the Eastern Region has largely been due to the seeking of self interest by the likes of Gollom, Bannerman, Wise, Agnew, Curtis, Smith and others who are clearly discredited and have done such damage making such justified and serious enemies on route.

One only needs to look at the main body of the party to see an example of how NOT to do almost everything political – it has been one long squabble by little men for their own gain and glory.

You have managed to drive off every serious backer, train no one, lose sight of the goal and now even try to blame you failures on the mythical invasion by the BNP – yet have proved completely unable to identify with substance a single straw towards Farage’s Reichstag Fire – the plot of corruptly shifting blame for the dishonesty and corruption and seizing absolute control as Hitler did with HIS Reichstag Fire has gone off like a damp squib making all concerned in your plot look foolish.

There was no match to light the fire and the only smoking gun was the trail of bullet holes in the feet of clay of Farage’s cronies.Keep reading my eMails and you will steadily see the plot collapse.

Read Mein Kampf and you will realise why Hitler succeeded and Farage & EUkip failed – the importance of training, structure, organisation, lines of command & respect ensured when his Reichstag Moment came Hitler had the right people in the right places to seize control and to this day there are those who believe the Fire might have been the act of a dissident – no such luck for Farage the fingerprints of he and his cronies are all over the alleged and engineered plot – right down to their having been predicted by me in written eMails and having got their time lines muddled by their gofers.

As I have said repeatedly – my contact details are readily available and I am happy to defend the patriotism of my actions, clearly showing my every word to be correct where fact is distributed and my opinions to be substantive and sound.

I have had one side or another seeking to smear me for years and beyond the childish level of lies of Ian Smith today on behalf of his puppet masters and dishonesty such as Gollom has promoted about me or the idiocy and lies of Denny & Croucher that have done so much to discredit them I have proved exactly who I claim to be motivated ONLY by the position I have consitently held and as for Croucher’s idiotic drivel about my anti Jewish stance or my affiliation with the BNP – NOTHING other than his own life and behaviour has made him look so stupid!

I repeat I am happy to attest to my every statement in detail and in outline and will willingly present at any mutually convenient public meeting to show my every statement about EUkip and the corruption of its leadership is correct.

I do not sabre rattle about libel & courts as any court would merely laugh at EUkip and dismiss the case as being unfair of me as to be libelled by EUkip is no insult as they are consistently dishonest and everyone knows it – hence they get 0.03% vote as in the recent by election.Well done EUkip – haven’t your leaders done well as your remaining gullible supporters mill around squabbling – turning up 12 at a time to hear your message.

NOT A BACKER IN SIGHT!
NO ONE TRUST YOU!
£45,000 in the bank & staring down both barrels in terms of costs and forfeiture with a pre determined guilty verdict running to near £1,000,000
Then there are all the other Court cases piling up.
NO WONDER it is an open subject of discussion, particularly in Brussels that Farage will siphon ALL resources into getting himself re-elected and then jump ship – it is even rumoured that Kirsten is merely waiting for his re-election to get a better settlement! One can not blame her I guess with her £25,000 a year rumoured to have been hush money, Farage’s hush money bill must be massive!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
MAY I SUGGEST:
Since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

#112* - Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!

#112* - Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S CORRUPTION & FARAGE’S REICHSTAG FIRE!

Hi,

I though we could get back to showing just how corrupt the management of EUkip is by mailing copies of a few eMails that are in circulation amongst certain members of the NEC & leadership of EUkip – some have come direct from the EU and some from those who are amongst or with access to leadership or NEC computers including their owners ;-)

Sorry not to supply Mr. Farage and his corrupt cronies and Brown Shirts with further identities to add to his Reichstag Fire expulsion lists once he has enacted his Hitler style Enabling Act thereby dispensing with the Disciplinary Committee structure, deselecting those on the NEC who will not act as his puppets and muppets, suspending the Constitution and subsuming to himself and a few enforcers the right to expel people who will not go along with his lies, deceptions, duplicity and determination to at all cost get re-elected to the troughs on the gravy train.

It increasingly looks like: the only real funding will be siphoned to fund Farage getting his snout back in the EU troughs and then clearly the funds will be depleted – Farage’s idiot milch cow Alan Bown will have spent out – having been fool enough to pay for Nigel Farage & Andrew Smith’s unprofessional and irresponsible antics and lies.

Any Court cases will be brought against EUkip, where the duped NEC are bankers of last resort, and Farage will most probably jump ship.

He has already PROVED he is duplicitous, selfish, incompetent, without any leadership skills, unable to delegate, corrupt and dishonest. He and his cronies have also proved that they have no reputation to uphold nor have I ever wittingly misled or lied or they would have slapped a writ on me! However TRUTH is my provable defence ;-)

Political Parties and men of integrity sue to defend their name not to make money!

I have ONLY told the truth – whether you like it or not.

You have my name, my address & my phone number – I have offered to be cross examined to establish I am telling the truth, at any mutually convenient time and place; before a public audience – those who I have exposed as liars, frauds, cheats, spivs and fools are more than welcome to cross examine me, to try to establish my details and opinions about them are untrue and or libellous, as I have NO wish to mislead or lie about anyone or anything.

How about these letters now ;-)

Before you read them do be aware that George Curtis is a liar and corrupt – a coward, only too willing to curry favour by outright lies, as long as he thinks he will not be found out – he has been!

George Curtis has to my CERTAIN knowledge lied about me and also Robin Page & John West – I have read George Curtis’s weedling report to the NEC and also his eMail to the corrupt self appointed regional committee, which as we know harbours also the proven cheat and rascal Andrew Smith.

Smith acting WITH Farage and others looks as if he may well cost EUkip between £500,000 and £1,000,000 with his dishonesty and lies, in cahoots with Nigel Farage, David Lott and others.

George Curtis is a revolting coward and a sordid low life who when confronted on the phone was unable to give honest account of his grubby behaviour.

Anyway do read these letters from the NEC archives ;-)

Dear All'
I would not normally interfere in another branch's business, but in view of the contents and the fact that I have been copied in I will.
According to the rules as in force when this new committee first met, it was not elected as the rules then dictated. It was appointed by Tom Wise, which was not a legitimate means of 'election'.
David Bannerman was given full\ documentation as to the illegality of the committee, and he repeatedly promised to sort it out. However he did not do this, and when he left the Party Chairmanship, the dosier was handed to John Whittacker, who maintained e-mail contact with me keeping me up-to-date with his progress in the matter. He replied to an e-mail of mine early this year with words to the effect that the problem had been sorted, because the new rules published in February 2008 would apply.
George Curtis'\problem now is that he has not followed the Feb 08 rules, so the committee is still\ illegal, and has been since early 2006. Incidentally he also illegally dissolved the previous committee.

George Curtis p.s. at the end of the invitation for the 29th Nov meeting is untrue, the activists who have been in regular contact and will be at the next meeting, meet for the good of UKIP and Britain, and` are fed-up with the rule-breaking at all levels of UKIP, not to mention the lies and deceit.There will be some senior UKIP members there and I strongly suggest that G Curtis sendsout a retraction of his p.s.

yours with many good reasons for fighting against the EU,

Martin HARVEY


In a message dated 07/11/2008 12:03:49 GMT Standard Time, reeve@ukip.org writes:

To Peter Cole.

Again your email is completely inaccurate and misleading. The email referring to 'batches' was sent to your home email yesterday.
RE: INVITATION
From:
PETER REEVE (reeve@ukip.org)
Sent:
06 November 2008 13:06:43
To:
peter cole(home) (kingcolehole@ntlworld.com)

Please also note that : Georges role as the Eastern Counties Chairman's is legitimate. We have, on several occasions, checked with the appropriate people in the hierarchy of Party that there is no problem and all relevant individuals have been happy that both the committee and its officers are sound until just after the European Elections 2009.

Hope this helps. Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties

From: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk
To: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk; reeve@ukip.org
CC: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: meeting 29th Nov. & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:13:40 +0000

Good morning Len,

To-date I have NOT been notified by Mr Reeve about ‘Batches’. I must agree with your last statement about Mr Reeve standing down but as Mr Curtis is a self appointed so called chairman of an unlawful committee I could not care less what he does as by UKIP’s own rules the position he states he holds does not exist!

Peterc

From: Len Baynes [mailto:lenbay@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: 07 November 2008 08:52
To: PETER REEVE
Cc: Peter Cole; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com ; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: meeting 29th Nov. & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

Peter again you get it wrong please read my E-Mail as it was intended I quote '' If this situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant'' That in your wildest dreams is not a statement of fact, I was in this party long before you had even been on the distant horizon and will not get out just to allaviate a thorn in your side. I am afraid I cannot make the 29th of November due to a family birthday in Enfield but I am confident I will be truthfully informed of proceedings by my chairman.
As for my name on the national list it will be submitted when and if my branch select me and my chairman approves, I honestly think that is the right proceedure. But under the present situation I feel my call for you and Mr. Curtis to stand down is perfectly justified.

----- Original Message -----
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes ; peter cole(home) ; jan baynes ; george curtis
Cc: del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; derek norman ; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; john west ; martin harvey
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:46 PM
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.þ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

To Len Baynes, Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested. Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that : (So the batch with ‘C’ in and the batch with ‘W’ in haven’t been sent out REALLY so what has and how come I know people whose name begins with both ‘C’ & ‘W’ that have received your grubby fiddlings?) "Because we have been very successful in recruiting a large number of candidates in the Eastern Counties the advert has gone out in several batches and will be completed by the end of the week.

I look forward to seeing you on the 29th Nov."(Rubbish – you have the sum total of 1,770 members on your Eastern Region data base and of that 470ish have eMail addresses – Do cut the spin – EUkip’s corrupt leadership is FINISHED) I have also included a copy of the circular (below) for your and their attention.

However your stated intention to stand against a UKIP candidate in elections is interesting and could explain some of your recent activity.

Thanks for letting me know. Please may I remind you, your Chairman and your Secretary via this email, that only candidates on the 'National Approved List' may go forward to a Constituency to be considered for selection as a Westminster Candidate for UKIP.

You are currently not on that list as you have not applied. If I can help with any other matter please do let me know. Pete Peter ReeveRegional OrganiserUKIP Eastern Counties reeve@ukip.org07792 290434Circular :
Subject: FW: Sat 29th Nov - valuable meeting date for your diary!þ

To all Branch Chairmen, (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) Westminster Prospective Candidates (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) and Prospective Local Candidates (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) We are very pleased to invite you to a full campaign briefing & discussion (Propaganda and spin rally to tell you a pack of lies?

We will also provide the latest fantasies in the Reichstag Fire Ploy to seize control of the party – your help is needed to aid this corruption) There will be senior party members present (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) who will give us details of the campaign plans and provide plenty of time for question and lies.

We will also have a full policy Question and Lie session, to go through any part of the manifesto or specific policy detail that you wish to discuss and address. Will Bannerman be resigning having lied to the party and brought EUroScepticism into disrepute and will he resign from his EU job that involves promoting the EU?

The aim of this meeting is to be an interactive session where senior party members can listen to your ideas and thoughts as well as provide answers to any questions that you have. I will provide details of the venue and full agenda very shortly. Please will you keep free in your diary for this valuable Reichstag rally.

Please do feel free to invite your branch officers and activists' to come along and participate. If you have any queries please contact your Regional Organiser on (I’m not here to advertise corruption) Regards George Curtis Eastern Counties Chairman (Self Appointed Liar)

PS : We confirm that this an official UKIP meeting on CUT. We understand that some people may be inviting some branch chairmen etc. to an unofficial meeting in Newmarket (around 8th Nov) designed largely to attack the Party (NO Mr. Curtis you will find it is to expose liars like you).

They are attempting to disguise this as a meeting for activists, but we stress this is not official, not authorised, and no senior members will be present (Well that is a relief it will prevent them having to listen to liars like you or the sordid little desk delivery man Bannerman the liar, cheat and fraudster working for the EU).

We do recommend you attend this meeting. If you have any queries please do contact *******..[THE PHONE NUMBER THE LIAR GEORGE CURTIS GIVES IS THAT OF PETER REEVE ONE TIME RO BUT DESELECTED BY VARIOUS BRANCHES AND SUBJECT OF NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS TO THE NEC.] Peter Reeve lives with Lisa Duffy & her children and I gather a few of his – you will note La Duffy dishonestly gained her seat on the NEC and will no doubt be voting on the matter of Peter Reeve and the subject of those who have lodged legitimate complaints against Peter Reeve.

George Curtis’s phone number is: 01206 – 322 3221 Do phone him up and point out he is a liar and a coward and the meeting on the 8th. is very much official as it has been openly advertised with due notice

From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: reeve@ukip.org
CC: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk; del1young@yahoo.co.uk; rebeldel@talktalk.net; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:59:21 +0000

Peter please forward this to George Curtis. your actions in not inviting our branch chairman are at least diabolical and at best a downright insult.

I shall be standing in the local elections next year for Doddington and my name will go forward as PPC for NE. Cambs and I will do this with or without your sanction if need be as a independant. The actions of the present leadership and NEC, over the question of Mr. Abbott and Mr. Edmonds fill me with disgust and I am afraid if the present situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant and stand against the official UKIP candidate and I know I have the following from the last election to make an impact.

I call on you both now in the interest of the party to stand down.

(DON’T BE SILLY LEN THESE ODIOUS CREEPS ARE LIKE THE COMMENT ON SH*t & BLANKETS – THEY ARE LIARS AND CHEATS BULLYS AND IN THIS FOR PERSONAL SELF GAIN. G.L-W.)
Then here is another letter the author of which I have removed as my NEC contact MIGHT not wish it to be known he had a copy of this ;-)

Dear George Curtis

For one who has long been associated with an unelected "committee" to refer to the Newmarket meeting as you do in your postscript is laughably impertinent, in fact from anyone with any substance it would be slightly insulting.

The Newmarket meeting comprised grass roots members of the party most of whom have no political ambitions beyond the withdrawal of Britain from the E.U.. A number of us are members of long standing and of proven loyalty; far from wishing to damage the party we aim to strengthen it through the elimination of unconstitutional and undemocratic practises.

Nigel Farage has often said "This is a grass roots party." and paid lip service to the debt owed to the "grass roots". A modicum of leadership at N.E.C. level would have resolved our position long ago, instead we have been treated with condescension and disparagement.

This one is about the great arsehole of the East the liar, coward and general low life George Curtis and his dishonest attack on the meeting of the 8th. November – what a creep he is!
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:42:53 +0000The unelected chairman of an unelected committee has the nerve to attack an elected chairman for holding a meeting.

You couldn't make it up.
John West

From: reeve@ukip.org
To: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk; kingcolehole@ntlworld.com; jan-clark@tiscali.co.uk; gscurtis@aspects.net
CC: del1young@yahoo.co.uk; rebeldel@talktalk.net; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com; martinharveyonr@aol.com
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:46:17 +0000
To Len Baynes,
Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested.

Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that :

"Because we have been very successful in recruiting a large number of candidates in the Eastern Counties the advert has gone out in several batches and will be completed by the end of the week. I look forward to seeing you on the 29th Nov."

I have also included a copy of the circular (below) for your and their attention. However your stated intention to stand against a UKIP candidate in elections is interesting and could explain some of your recent activity.

Thanks for letting me know. Please may I remind you, your Chairman and your Secretary via this email, that only candidates on the 'National Approved List' may go forward to a Constituency to be considered for selection as a Westminster Candidate for UKIP.

You are currently not on that list as you have not applied. If I can help with any other matter please do let me know.
Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties
07792 290434

Circular : from The Curtis chappie [*CUT* BORING!!!]

MORE!!!
From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: Fw: Selection of PPC
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:29:15 +0000

Having been through this process twice ,I am certain the branch acceptasnce comes first and then the selection panel or maybe I am getting senile, or heaven forbid Mr. Reeve has got it wrong yet again

----- Original Message -----
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes
Cc: jan baynes
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: Selection of PPC

Len Please let me clarify. BEFORE you approach a branch for selection you MUST FIRST be on the National Approved list. This requires you to first apply to the process, then have an interview (The selection panel is organised by and includes the regional organiser). You will then be informed if you are on the approved list or not.

If you get onto the approved list - Then and ONLY then can you make an application to a constituency Association or Branch. Tom Wise, John West and Peter Cole all went through the process with varying outcomes and may be able to help you understand. I look forward to receiving your application form. If you require a copy of the form to complete, please let me know. I have again copied the Fenland Secretary into this email to confirm she is aware of the appropriate process.
Thanks.
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties
reeve@ukip.org
07792 290434

From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: reeve@ukip.orgCC: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.comSubject:
Re: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:52:28 +0000

Peter again you get it wrong please read my E-Mail as it was intended I quote '' If this situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant'' That in your wildest dreams is not a statement of fact, I was in this party long before you had even been on the distant horizon and will not get out just to allaviate a thorn in your side. I am afraid I cannot make the 29th of November due to a family birthday in Enfield but I am confident I will be truthfully informed of proceedings by my chairman. As for my name on the national list it will be submitted when and if my branch select me and my chairman approves, I honestly think that is the right proceedure. But under the present situation I feel my call for you and Mr. Curtis to stand down is perfectly justified.

----- Original Message -----
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes ; peter cole(home) ; jan baynes ; george curtis
Cc: del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; derek norman ; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; john west ; martin harvey
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:46 PM
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

To Len Baynes,
Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested.
Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that :

"Because we have been very successful in recruiting a large number of candidates in the Eastern Counties the advert has gone out in several batches and will be completed by the end of the week. I look forward to seeing you on the 29th Nov."

I have also included a copy of the circular (below) for your and their attention. However your stated intention to stand against a UKIP candidate in elections is interesting and could explain some of your recent activity.

Thanks for letting me know. Please may I remind you, your Chairman and your Secretary via this email, t hat only candidates on the 'National Approved List' may go forward to a Constituency to be considered for selection as a Westminster Candidate for UKIP. You are currently not on that list as you have not applied.
If I can help with any other matter please do let me know.
Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional OrganiserUKIP Eastern Counties

It is amazing that with this sort of behaviour – the lies and dishonesty that was the scam to its cronies as PPCs for the EU where they were happy to fleece members for £250 to compete in a rigged election and then steal £1,000 from those they listed to do the hustings work with no chance, agreeing Farage can personally select the top candidates in each region in April.
JUST HOW STUPID ARE EUkip CANDIDATES
and where did Bannerman scrape up £1,000 or has he sold the desk!

EUkip leadership & NEC have admitted they are corrupt and that is why they refunded the money for breech of contract to several candidates who demanded it (including Lynnda Robson, Robin Page and no doubt others - at the moment I gather claims have been lodged in the Courts by others!).

They KNOW that EUkip hasn’t a leg to stand on as their internal report by their own Returning Officer clearly stated the election was corrupt and should be re-run by a trustworthy body as the Leadership had proved untrustworthy – which is why I published the facts.

I hope the honest members who turn up to the meeting later today will be able to make forward strides to clean up the party in the East working towards removal of liars, cheats, the corrupt, the self interested and the crooks – the likes of Bannerman, Reeve, Duffy, Gulleford, Titford, Curtis, Smith, Agnew, Whitmore & similar pond life attracted by the troughs on the gravy train.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:LEAVE THE EU