Tuesday, 24 November 2009

#735* - EUkip's Paul NUTTALL makes a fool of himself

#735* - EUkip's Paul NUTTALL makes a fool of himself

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

EUkip's Paul NUTTALL makes a fool of himself YET AGAIN is it Just EUkip's Endemic Corruption & Lack of ANY MORAL COMPASS?


Hi,

I must say I find it almost impossible to find error in the posting below which I have copied from another blog which I read daily:


UKIP: Paul Nuttall continues

to make a fool of himself


We really pity the people of the North West.

To have the odious Paul Nuttall representing you is nothing short of a tragedy.

Nuttall is nothing more than a grubby Mussolini clone without a single shred of decency or honesty.

His recent desperate attempts for publicity are laughable.

He has attacked Sir Paul McCartney’s support for vegetarianism. Clearly he doesn’t care about the green vote or even those UKIPPERS who may be vegetarian.

He bemoans the fact that under proportional representation the BNP gained a seat in the North West.

Has he already forgotten that without PR he would never have been elected to the EU Gravy Train? One rule for him and one rule for the BNP?

But at least we know that he doesn’t believe in democracy and the right of the electorate to vote for the party of their choice.

Look at his recent track record:

He was Party Chairman during a disastrous period for the party. A period of unrest where UKIP lost both the treasurer and leader.

He fabricated complaints against Gregg Beaman.

He supported Farage’s attempts to give him dictatorial powers to remove so-called dissidents from the party.

He supports the suppression of free speech in UKIP.

He supported the removal of democratically elected members - Dr Eric Edmond and Dr David Abbott - from UKIP’s NEC. Their only crime was to raise concerns about corruption in UKIP.

He agreed to be appointed UKIP national chairman in total disregard of the membership who were not even consulted about his appointment.

He colluded in the rigging of UKIP's MEP selection process. Piers Merchant - UKIP's Returning Officer - gave him a copy of his report on the MEP selection process. In this report it was clearly stated that the process had been corrupted. Nuttall ignored it.

In Brussels and Strasbourg he is happy to sit with fascists and racists and yet he has the nerve to attack the BNP!

And he supports kangaroo courts and witch-hunts conducted against all those members who dare to question Farage’s leadership.

The man is truly contemptible. He has no scruples, integrity or decency. He will do anything to get the top of the greasy pole and stay there. He would readily stab his own colleagues in the back for personal gain.

And he can’t even be honest about the reasons behind his decision to resign as Party Chairman.

He did not resign in order to spend more time campaigning in the North West or to give the new leader the freedom to choose a new chairman.

He resigned because the Farage/Nuttall partnership in corruption was falling apart.

And he wonders why people don't trust him!

The original of this article can be seen at: CLICK HERE

I wonder if the blogger, who has a consistent track record of accuracy and inside information about EUkip with their team effort and EU staffer positions, whether it was deliberate to make no comment on the distortions, gaffes and dishonesty of Nuttall at the meeting he called at UGLEY CLICK HERE

Also it is worth reading the details of just how corrupt EUkip has been under the Chairmanship of Paul Nuttall and the leadership of Nigel Farage as they angled, wangled, cheated and lied to get their political chums in place CLICK HERE 

Also the discredited Marta Andreasen was brought into EUkip during Nuttall's chairmanship and Farage's leadership details of some of her dishonesties can be found at CLICK HERE or if you wish to read the full transcript of the Judgement against her CLICK HERE

I note Nuttall is making much of going to Northern Ireland on a mission to try to find support - it was interesting to note on EUkip's web site that his efforts put forward claims of working with Jim McAlister but without quotes and with only photos of EUkip members!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Monday, 23 November 2009

#734* - Jon SOPEL - POLITICS SHOW - EUkip Hustings

#734* - Jon SOPEL - POLITICS SHOW - EUkip Hustings

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!


Jon SOPEL - BBC POLITICS SHOW - EUkip Hustings in PETERBOROUGH!



Hi,

The Politics Show which you can watch on line for a week at CLICK HERE

Covered the EUkip leadership hustings at Peterborough.

Jon Sopel starts the article at approximately 50 minutes into the programme with his arrival at Peterborough Station and as an aside just as he walked away it does look very like he has overlooked the fact that Malcolm Lord Pearson was emerging behind him - or so it seems.

Had I never been to a Labour, Plaid, Tory, AWB, Republican, Democrat or Nat meeting I would probably despair of any hope but honestly folks EUkip candidates and audience are not as odd as one might think - when compared with other political audiences!

Had Farage gone on National TV and said 'there is no credible candidate for the role of leader' one might have had some sympathy but that he thought that ANY of these characters could be described as a 'credible' candidate calls into question Farage's judgement and was soundly debunked by Jon Sopel.


Is it to be the BNP in Blazers or the BNP in Ermine & Blazers seems the only question with Alan Wood placed to be an honourable also ran, clearly Pearson, Batten and Nattrass all have, at least, their roots in racism and at worst current Islamaphobia and or Zionism.

That leaves Sinclaire as their only hope and I just have this fear there are not enough decent people in power in EUkip who would back her cleaning up the party and refusing to sit with the extremist racists and violent xenophobes of the Lega Nord or their sexually intollerant violence or the anti Jewish bretheren of Greece who form The EFD.


That Sinclaire would introduce an open and transparent organisational structure and strenuously try to avoid being the EU's dupe I have no doubt but whether she would have the support to resist forming a Pan EU Political Party I doubt as the other MEPs seem only interested in their own incomes and as for the others I see no possibility!

Well if you haven't voted yet I believe you have only the chance of voting against the 3 extremists leaving only Alan Wood or Nikki Sinclaire.

Good luck!!!!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Sunday, 22 November 2009

#733* - JUST HOW STUPID IS Mike NATTRASS?

#733* - JUST HOW STUPID IS Mike NATTRASS?


Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

JUST HOW STUPID IS Mike NATTRASS?
IS THERE A 5th. AMENDMENT IN TheEU?


Hi,

NATTRASS SEEKS A FACE SAVER for his risible result in the leadership election and beig publiclly humiliated as an uncredible leader! Years liking Farage's boots and doing what he was told like a sad puppet only to be treated like that on National TV true as it was it was clearly unkind of Farage, in his fear that Sinclaire might actually beat his chosen puppet Pearson.

You may well have read the article here CLICK which covered/contained The Sunday Times announcement that Mike Nattrass was, along with various others, under investigation on various counts by OLAF and of course Daniel Foggo published the story and subsequent facts pertaining to Tom Wise which eventually saw Wise in Prison and showed beyond doubt that Nigel Farage was a liar when he claimed he had removed/fired whatever Wise as soon as they knew - It was Foggo who made it clear that EUkip had colluded in numerous attempts to cover-up the crimes.

The story was not in-accurate - it is conveniently forgotten by the pond life of EUkip that Daniel Foggo is a leading award winning investigative Journalist who has broken some huge stories around the world whilst they merely feed from the public purse in a sordid self enrichment programme. Daniel having exposed the hypocracy of Knapman and then Farage who despite promises to the contarary employed his wife.

Unfortunately part of his next story was sourced elsewhere and although it led to a letter of apology from Farage's solicitors to The Times the Sunday Times opted to make a payment not on the principle of hypocracy being wrong, but that the new informant had supplied incomplete information and checks with the authorities were then equally as erroneous.

In this instance Michael Nattrass EUkip MEP is being investigated by OLAF.

Amusingly an 'e'Mailer of long standing with BNP leanings circulated the story:

Andrew Edwards circulated the Sunday Times article with the comment:

Subject: UKIP MEP Michael Nattrass in expenses fraud inquiry:

Looks like Daniel Foggo has uncovered another one of UKIP's 'innocent men'!!!  As Foggo implies, this investigation is part of a wider one, so who will be next.  There will be some other very nervous UKIP MEP's this morning!

The link to The Sunday Times is: CLICK HERE
 & reads:

UKIP MEP Michael Nattrass in expenses fraud inquiry

MEP Mike Nattrass
(Paul Vicente)
MEP Mike Nattrass

An MEP for the United Kingdom Independence party is being investigated by the European Union’s anti-fraud watchdog over his use of expenses.

Michael Nattrass, who has represented the West Midlands in the European parliament since 2004, is the subject of an inquiry into whether Denis Brookes, one of his former aides, was paid through public funds while he was working as a regional organiser for UKIP. The EU does not allow taxpayers’ money to be used to pay party officials.

The inquiry into Nattrass, which is part of a wider investigation into UKIP’s finances, comes as one of its former MEPs, Tom Wise, was jailed last week for two years for embezzling funds out of his assistant’s allowance.

Separately, it has also emerged that Nattrass was using a business of which he was an equity partner as the “paying agent” for all his assistants’ salaries provided by the EU.
Between 2004 and summer this year, all of his assistants’ allowances were channelled through the business account of Nattrass Giles, a chartered surveyors in Birmingham which he founded nearly 30 years ago.
Nattrass was a signatory to the bank account, although he insisted last night that the administration was handled by another partner in the firm who has since died.

MEPs must not act as their own paying agents. The role can only be performed by “third parties”.
New rules brought in since July this year have further tightened the controls and MEPs can now only use accredited people or companies as paying agents.

Nattrass said he had been told by EU officials that he could use his Birmingham company.
He also insisted that Brookes had worked for him in his capacity as an MEP until his employment as an aide came to an end three years ago.

The facts behind this are at CLICK HERE

Quite the idiot Nattrass had someone write a letter for him (it is in intelligible English!) as:
Dear All.

I am pleased to say there is no truth in the Foggo article.
Foggo knows this because we spoke prior to him going to press... but it made no difference.... so much for the facts.

There is no enquiry into paying agents. So there is no "Fraud Enquiry" However>

Nattrass Giles were not Limited. Foggo knows this and the shares stuff is a made up Foggo mythe. He even confirmed he knew it was not limited when I spoke to him!

NG were suggested as paying agent by the EU officials when I filled in the forms in 2004. I declared my connection with NG and it complied with the rules. NG paid very few employees as paying agents and the payroll was overseen by Chartered Accountants. It more than complied with the EU rules, because at that time the Chartered Accountants were not essential

They are asking whether Brookes worked for me or for the Party as RO. This is Brookes again complaining and I have beaten him off many times in court on this already. He worked for me and the fact is obvious as this was my very high profile argument with him when he failed to attend meetings.

Anyway it appears the Times want to stop me in the leadership race.

I like a challenge like this. But it may be time to go for damages against the Sunday Times and Edwards and the inflamed way Edwards reports these things will not impress the court. 

Mike
So lets look at this in some detail:
I am pleased to say there is no truth in the Foggo article. 
 Having read Foggo's article and having checked the details what wasn't true - I can see no errors in it so why are you making a fool of yourself Nattrass?
Foggo knows this because we spoke prior to him going to press... but it made no difference.... so much for the facts.
Well having spoken to him you will probably have told him that when you got back from swanning around in the Philippines on a family holiday having had all summer off it seems! As a doughty MEP for EUkip you had received the information that Derek Bennett the fireplace chap and part time Regional Organiser had been questioned by OLAF and I presume that they had tried to clarify Lynn Ashraff's position too and others. No doubt Nattrass also told Foggo that he had received some of the details  from OLAF regarding the fraud enquiry.

Which fact was it Nattrass didn't understand exactly?
There is no enquiry into paying agents. So there is no "Fraud Enquiry" However>
I wonder if that was what Nattrass was told or what he would like to portray or even believe.
Nattrass Giles were not Limited. Foggo knows this and the shares stuff is a made up Foggo mythe. 
 Even in the original article there was no mention of Limited!
It has also emerged that Nattrass was using a company of which he was a shareholding partner as the “paying agent” for all his assistants’ salaries provided by the EU.
You will note since it is a standard paper rather than a financial journal it called Nattrass a 'shareholding partner' had it been a financial journal it would no doubt have said he had 'a share in the equity having been a founding partner'.
He even confirmed he knew it was not limited when I spoke to him!
So Foggo was right - glad Nattrass confirmed that!
NG were suggested as paying agent by the EU officials when I filled in the forms in 2004. 
I do doubt that they understood because this clearly is not compliant with the intent of 'paying agents'. 
I declared my connection with NG and it complied with the rules.
This is just not very plausible - what would be the point of paying agents? The aim is to remove the MEP from control of the money not just to put it into an account with a different name that the MEP controls!
NG paid very few employees as paying agents and the payroll was overseen by Chartered Accountants. It more than complied with the EU rules, because at that time the Chartered Accountants were not essential
 No but the purpose was that Nattrass did NOT have control of his own expenses.
They are asking whether Brookes worked for me or for the Party as RO.
Then why is Nattrass dennying he is being investigated when he is?
This is Brookes again complaining and I have beaten him off many times in court on this already.
Oh so there is an on going investigation!
He worked for me and the fact is obvious as this was my very high profile argument with him when he failed to attend meetings.
In normal parlance this is called a defence!
Anyway it appears the Times want to stop me in the leadership race.
This is delusional - The Sunday Times could care less who wins and clearly Nattrass is nowhere near a runner - he even Miked off on holiday during the campaign. Farage was spot on when he said of Nattrass & Batten they were 'uncrdible candidates for the leadership!
I like a challenge like this. But it may be time to go for damages against the Sunday Times and Edwards and the inflamed way Edwards reports these things will not impress the court.
If Nattrass is serious he is an even greater idiot than many of us thought him to be!

Before emulating Farage and making an utter pratt of himself in the Courts and risking the same type of debts Farage has incurred I suggest poor old Mike tries to explain what his case against The Sunday Times is as to more than shout rude words and sabre rattle could well do Nattrass a huge financial damage.

Interestingly, much as EUkip might like to control Freedom of Speech just what crime does Nattrass believe Edwards has committed? That would look good as Nattrass would surely loose!


TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

#732* - ONE WONDERS WHY STUART WHEELER HAS LIED

#732* - ONE WONDERS WHY STUART WHEELER HAS LIED


Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

ONE WONDERS WHY STUART WHEELER HAS LIED, IS HE A FOOL, DISHONEST or A DUPE?

The millionaire Mr Stuart Wheeler, founder of the financial spread betting company IG Index,  and father of supermodel Jacquetta Wheeler...


One has to wonder what it is about EUkip that it attracts scrap dealers and professional gamblers as backers so readily. I can not understand why Stuart Wheeler has shown such a staggeringly foolish lack of understanding of the Electoral Commission case against EUkip - someone has even dishonestly duped the poor old chap that beyond the similarity of the names Bown and Brown there is any meaningful similarity between the EUkip case and that of The Lib.Dims.

For all Stuart Wheeler's foolish prattle and the outright lies of Nigel Farage the Courts have the measure of the case - hence the GUILTY verdict before the Court after various rounds of cost escalating stupidity by Farage's Fan Club of Fools, in their chase for personal agrandisement.

Stuart Wheeler has put his name to the following quite foolish and proven inaccurate statement:

Wheeler speaks up for UKIP
Saturday, 21st November 2009
A major donor to the UK  Independence Party has hit out at the Electoral Commission over its decision to push UKIP for the return of a £360,000 donation while allowing the Lib Dems to keep £2.4 million given to them by a criminal now on the run.
Former Tory donor and spread betting millionaire Stuart Wheeler, who donated £100,000 to UKIP before the European elections said today: "I am not a member of UKIP but I do support them and this does not seem right.


"The Electoral Commission has now said it does not intend to take proceedings against the Liberal Democrats for the recovery of gifts totalling about £2.4 million pounds given to them by a company controlled by Michael Brown, a man who was not a permissible donor and who is now on the run, having been sentenced to seven years imprisonment.


"It is clear that the donation came from abroad and was therefore entirely against the spirit of the relevant legislation.


"But the Commission has decided to pursue UKIP for recovery of a donation given by somebody who could easily have made the donation through a permissible company and who would have been a permissible donor but for a purely technical slip which is acknowledged by the court to have been entirely inadvertent."
Perhaps the poor old chap should have read up on the FACTS rather than listen to the well crafted and misleading claims of the petty crooks and liars running EUkip.

UKIP to forfeit £350,000 in donations after Electoral Commission victory

The UK Independence Party stands to forfeit nearly £350,000 in donations after the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of watchdog body the Electoral Commission.


A long-running legal dispute between the Commission and the party centred on donations in the form of cash and services from retired bookmaker Alan Bown at a time when he was not on the electoral roll.
Three judges ordered the case back to the magistrates' court for a new decision on forfeiture based on their findings.
Sir Paul Kennedy said: ''In the present case I can detect nothing which would entitle the magistrates' court not to make the forfeiture order which the EC seeks.''
Mr Bown had been on the electoral register in Thanet, Kent, but was removed by mistake without his knowledge in December 2004.
He did not find out until December 2005 and he was reinstated the following February.
Ukip, which has one MP and 10 MEPs, admitted breaking the law, but said it was due to a clerical error and that to order forfeiture of the entire sum would be disproportionate.
In August 2007, City of Westminster Magistrates' Court held that although Ukip had not taken ''all reasonable steps'' to establish that Mr Bown was on the roll, the error was accidental.
It ruled that Ukip should forfeit only £18,481 of the total but the Commission brought a judicial review of the decision and the High Court ordered a fresh hearing.
That was put on hold when the watchdog referred the case to the Court of Appeal to clarify aspects of the law.
Sir Paul said the law requires a political party to take "all reasonable steps" to verify that a donation is permitted.
One of the rules is that donors must be on the electoral register if they give more than £200. This was enacted primarily to stop foreign donations.
"Parliament having decided that the test of acceptability of a donation from an individual should be whether that individual was registered in an electoral register, it seems to me to be irrelevant whether an impermissible donor is or is not making a foreign donation," said Sir Paul.
He said magistrates' courts should "not be seduced" into ignoring the wording of the Act governing donations.
"The fact that Ukip accepted donations from Mr Bown without realising that he was no longer in an electoral register is also, to my mind, immaterial."
Welcoming the decision, the Electoral Commission said: "The effect of the Court of Appeal's judgment is that, in all but exceptional circumstances, political parties should give up in full donations accepted from an individual who is not a 'permissible donor'."
Peter Wardle, chief executive, commented: "We brought this appeal because the magistrate's court decision created some uncertainty for political parties about the way the law should be applied. In this case, a party had accepted money that it should not have, but was allowed to keep most of it.
"Political parties need to raise money to campaign, develop policy and communicate with voters. But all parties also need to follow the rules. And these rules need to be clear, simple and easy to follow.
"Parliament decided that political parties should only be able to accept money from individuals if they are on a UK electoral register. This provides a straightforward test of whether they should accept money or not. They simply need to check the electoral register. The United Kingdom Independence Party did not take these simple steps.
"The court agreed that we took the right approach in this case, an approach that was in line with the intentions of Parliament when passing this legislation."
In February 2007 the commission sought forfeiture of 67 donations totalling £367,697 after a district judge ordered that Ukip should forfeit just £14,481.

Original article CLICK HERE

Clearly Stuart Wheeler has money to burn and a fool and his money are clearly easily parted!

It seems he has not read Andrew Smith's internal memo setting out to dupe the Electoral Commission:



From: "Smith Epping" To: "Geoffrey Kingscott" Cc: "Nigel Farage (UKIP)" ; "Douglas Denny"


Subject: Treasurers meeting


Thank you Geoffrey for organising the meeting. We need to give the Electoral Commission every reason to believe we are serious about compliance, in order to provide the next Party Treasurer with a good story to tell when we next fail to meet the statutory requirements.


They should be invited to any big regional meeting and to Party Conference to speak at least to a break-out meeting to Treasurers.


It would have been a suitable event for prospective Party Treasurers to learn a lot about what the job entailed. Were any of them there?


I thought the practical points which emerged, in the absence of the Electoral Commission, were a lesson for the NEC on what their priorities should be. The branches are crying out for better admin and they are full of good ideas.


I hope the NEC takes good notice of your report of the meeting.


AS
Surely Farage has a duty not to mislead people when he seeks to 'aquire' their money as to fail to do so must be a criminal action in line with obtaining money by false pretences!

Has Stuart Wheeler not realised the very many deliberate decisions made by EUkip which moved their position inexorably from a clerical error that was easily rectified through 67 offences all brought to EUkip's attention yet they arrogantly ignored the law and in total hubris managed to convert those minor correctable errors into a well earned GUILTY verdict and a debt of £3/4 Million!

Consider the Electoral Commission's letter:

Ukip’s rulebreaking

SIR – It is not correct for Christopher Booker (October 25) to suggest that Ukip was guilty of only a “trivial breach of electoral law” due to an “oversight” by not checking whether their donor, Alan Bown, was on the electoral register.

The law is clear: political parties must check that a donor is on the electoral register each time they accept a donation over £200. Ukip chose not to do so on 67 separate occasions, over a period of more than a year, and despite repeated warnings from the Electoral Commission.

Ukip took donations it was not entitled to receive, which gave it financial resources it was not entitled to have under the law. Ukip accepted that these donations – which totalled more than £365,000 – were all impermissible. But the magistrates’ court ordered them to forfeit just £18,481.

The Electoral Commission’s view was that this treatment of one party which had not followed the rules was unfair to the majority that do follow the rules and which have previously forfeited impermissible donations. The Court of Appeal shared that view.

Christopher Booker also claimed that the Commission “seems unwilling to take further action” in relation to donations from 5th Avenue Partners to the Liberal Democrats. In fact, we are conducting an ongoing investigation into that issue.

Peter Wardle
Chief Executive
The Electoral Commission
London SW1 

 The list of foolish folk who have swallowed the lies of Farage is long - he may have charm but he is quite clearly a moral dyslexic!


 Stuart Wheeler is only following in the footsteps od the opinionated twit from Newsnight Michael Crick who really did get carried away with his profound discovery that Bown & Brown were similar names! Crick's stupidity and lazy journalism was sadly copied by Christopher Booker which was indeed sad as it demeaned his otherwise accurate, informative and sound judgement.

EUkip is unarguably Guilty as charged, there is absolutely no doubt and now they are Guilty of duping a generous old man!

I tend to wonder which is the greater crime in moral terms! 

 

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Saturday, 21 November 2009

#731* - A LOOK AT THE ART OF LEADERSHIP IN THE EU

#731* - A LOOK AT THE ART OF LEADERSHIP IN THE EU

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

A LOOK AT THE ART OF LEADERSHIP IN THE EU - WHERE CLEARLY THE WEAKEST LINK WINS!

It has been clear that a power struggle to near destruction has taken place in The EU as The Commission fought to reinstate its role which had to a great extent been usurped by The Council of Ministers in recent years.

Those understanding the Machiavellian nature of the crooks building this vile undemocratic dictatorship have watched with rapt concern as to the outcome - a process not dissimilar to the 'Fix' orchestrated to create a new Pope - for a week one wondered whether to look out for perhaps different colours of smoke, blood trickling under the door from the secret meetings to FIX the new structure - How VERY Democratic!

This week has been the most fragile for several decades and few realised that this was their weakest hour - yet there were no Political forces in a position to seize the moment and one would be foolish not to wonder if the Faragista Fan Club acting as useful idiots to help The EU deliberately called a dishonest and corrupted leadership election as a deliberate move to distract from The EU's weakness at this point.

Well the wheels did not fly off in the battle and we now find that The Commission won the battle and further emasculated the input of the vestigial nation states now even more the vassals of the malign, centralised and corrupt EU.

Having placed two nebishes in office the new President being not so much a failure in democratic terms but in fact anti democratic and The EU's Foreign Minister, whatever the title, is all but unknown in her own Country save for being the wife of a Labour polster.

When they fail to convince the peoples of EUrope how well off they are with no say, no meaningful democracy and no freedom will they be removed and put to tender for replacement - perhaps John Major's family could provide two garden gnomes, with the personality of John himself they too would suit!



Do consider Richard North's comments on the matter:

"The choice of two low-profile leaders means that there are two immediate political winners from the process. The first is the European commission, under its renominated president José Manuel Barroso, who has emerged as at least the first among equals in the new Brussels lineup ... ".

You have to read quite far down the piece, but at least its there, in The Guardian - the first (and only) newspaper to realise that the EU commission is one of the winners from the selection of Van Rompuy and Baroness Ashton.

They still have not fully put the story together though – but it will eventually emerge. This was a successful coup by the commission, downgrading the position of the European Council president and the high representative. They were helped by France and Germany, neither leader wanting to be outshone by a high-profile figure.

There remains, of course, the mystery of why the Commission let the two positions find their way into the new treaty, and it looks possible that they took their eye off the ball. But once the threat was recognised, they acted swiftly and decisively, and have got their people in place.

Not only are the leaders of the member states constrained by the absorption of the European Council into the maw of the institutional structure, but the commission have got their man in as president. And, as any good chairman will tell you, the power lies in being able to set the agenda. The commission now has that power, on top of which their high representative – who is also a commission vice president – will be singing to the same hymn-sheet.

Thus, while we get The Independent reporting "limp waves of polite puzzlement" circling the globe at the appointments, the commission is well-satisfied with its gains.

To understand that, it just has to be appreciated that the purpose of the Lisbon treaty was not "as advertised", extending the external reach of the EU, but one continuing the internal process of consolidating the structures of the EU government and increasing its powers. The rest can come later.

Once that is understood, the events of the last few days are completely coherent, and entirely in character. The name of the game is European political integration, and that process has just taken a lurch forward.

To view Richard's article CLICK HERE

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

#730* - PETERBOROUGH HUSTINGS TO FIX THE LEADERSHIP

#730* - PETERBOROUGH HUSTINGS TO FIX THE LEADERSHIP

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

PETERBOROUGH HUSTINGS TO FIX THE LEADERSHIP WAS QUITE WELL ATTENDED WITH AN AUDIENCE OF 60-70 !

Hi,

The Peterborough hustings were better attended than expected to judge by the crowding in the room , which on a head count was somewhere around 60 or 70 based on a head count + the platform which was Chaired by Chris Moines.

Andrew Smith was conspicuous by his absence, no doubt not wishing to quizzed on his dishonesty and arrogant hubris in collusion with Nigel Farage that has garnered EUkip a guilty verdict in the Courts and a debt of £3/3 Million! Reeve was naturally there no doubt seeking compliments for his dishonest misrepresentation in the local media where he fabricated claims of being the whistleblower who was personally responsible for the arrest of Tom Wise - risible really when Daniel Foggo published the facts in the national press in October 2005 and the liar and all round bad egg Peter Reeve did not join EUkip Eastern Region working for Tom Wise until March 2007!

The dishonest cheat David Bannerman was there protecting his personal interests and Gollom slid in noticed by few - a long way to go hunting cats for his dinner some might say! He is I gather back trying to ride two horses once again in search of his ring - the one being as Press Secretary for the unfortunate Lord Stoddart.

Stuart Agnew  was present looking as if all these late nights and keeping up with the social life of EUkip in Brussels is proving more wearing than he had expected as it takes more effort to keep one's snout in the trough than filling in subsidy forms as a farmer working for The NFU towards enrichment by the introduction of ever greater subsidies with GM foods.

No doubt they had not foreseen the imminent huge hack of information from The CRU showing the bunkum that underpins much of Government claims on climate and farming, for details CLICK HERE

An interesting question from the odious McTrough to all of the candidates was rather damaging to them all, without exception, but I thought Batten faired worst even if his wooden presentation was a little better than usual. The question that had them all floundering was 'who would each of you choose as your deputy and your chairman' - I appreciate 4 of the candidates may not have given much thought to this as the election is so clearly rigged for Lord Pearson to be the winner - it was surprising he could not name his choices but perhaps Farage hasn't told him yet.

One wag wondered if Pearson had not named anyone because he doesn't know two people in the party as he has only gained his information from Farage.

Another wondered if the Zionist foundation would be letting him know later, since it was after all Friday evening! Shabbat takes precedence for Judaism but one wonders relative to Zionist secularism! It will be an early indication of Pearson's real agenda! I believe Margaret Thatcher was wise not to permit him a political role or a seat as an MP as clearly this Islamaphobic extremist is something of a political liability - though there are those who seem not to care whence EUkip's funding is sourced and I note there is a friends of Israel Group chaired by the party secretary and I understand deputied by Mike Nattrass and this can hardly have been seen as a disadvantage when attracting the likes of Stanley Kalms etc.

Here are more details of the meeting in Peterborough:

UKIP chooses its next leader


UKIP leadership contenders:
Gerard Batten, Mike Nattrass, Lord Pearson,
Nikki Sinclaire, Alan Wood

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Watch Gary Donaghue's video clip from Peterborough
Contenders line up for UKIP leadership
CLICK HERE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Watch Nikki Sinclaire's video clip from Peterborough
(I was unable to find clips of other contenders but Nikki Sinclaire has her own competent grass roots web site with rapid responses, which you can see if you CLICK HERE
Nattrass, Batten & Wood seem uninvolved in the election in terms of their Web presence - a medium they seem fairly out of touch with.
Malcolm Lord Pearson on the other hand has a costly site set up but seems not to participate - having delegated the job to the utterly untrustworthy Malcolm Wood who has been one of Farage's fixers and liars for several years - a damaging presence for Pearson as it shows more clearly just who is leader of EUkip whatever the party members may wish!
Malcolm Wood wrote Pearson's election address and gathered all his signatures of support rather undermining his integrity as a leader of the grass roots party, but clearly he is in fact in pursuit of another agenda.
To view the video clip:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gary O'Donoghue
Political correspondent, BBC News, UKIP leadership hustings

It is a chilly winter's evening and the UKIP faithful are crammed into a conference room in a Peterborough station hotel, improved by a recent lick of paint.

Most are in their late middle age, but there is a smattering of younger types, dressed twenty years too old for their age; there's even a child hanging around in the corridor outside - surely not there through choice.

The rest are hard core political activists whose every moment seems dominated by the threat of a European super state.

Protest, as they do, that UKIP has policies in all sorts of areas - and that is indeed true - but every conversation, seems eventually to land up in Brussels and its evils.

Tonight they are here to choose a new leader after their hero, Nigel Farage, announced he was standing down in order to take on Commons speaker John Bercow in his Buckingham constituency at the next general election.

Frankly none of the candidates are household names - three MEPs, one councillor and a member of the House of Lords.

And with a maximum of six months to go before an election, getting the winner acquainted with the voting public will be no easy task.

But despite their difficulties, the UKIP faithful are on a high.

Greater spoils

Thirteen MEPs elected at the European elections in June and a share of the popular vote that pushed Labour into third place.

Combine with that, their best ever by-election result in July's Norwich North contest - more than twelve percent of the vote - and they feel they have started to make some kind of breakthrough.


On tonight's evidence, whoever wins this contest will have a highly committed bunch of believers to capitalise on their current advantages

UKIP leadership: Runners and riders

The evidence is indeed encouraging.

At the 2005 General election the three main parties shared 92% of votes, leaving just 8% among the rest. But in recent months, particularly since the expenses scandal broke, the smaller parties have consistently attracted a larger slice of opinion.

So it is not unreasonable for UKIP, the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists, the Greens and the BNP to think that there are greater spoils to play for this time around.

UKIP have had their own share of difficulties over expenses, having to expel two MEPs when it emerged they were being investigated for false accounting in one case, and benefit fraud in another. Both men ended up in jail.

But the party believes it dealt swiftly with these errant types, in contrast they say to the main parties.

Their biggest boost though has been delivered to them on a plate by David Cameron.

Donation trouble

The Tory leader's decision not to offer a referendum on the Lisbon treaty has put a definite spring in the step of UKIP members.

They scent Tory grassroots disillusionment over the change in policy and UKIP sees itself as a natural home for Tories who feel they have nowhere else to go.

But it will not just be Europe on which they will attempt to sweep up the protest vote.

Immigration will be central to their campaigning strategy, a tactic they feel will capture unhappy Labour supporters as well.

"We are fishing in the same pond as the BNP," said one senior party member, "albeit with a slightly different worm".

Once the new leader is in place on 27 November, the fishing can begin; though one big headache remains.

The party is currently battling in the courts over a £350,000 donation from a former bookmaker, Alan Bown, who was not on the electoral register at the time he gave the money.

Unstage-managed

The party argues that Mr Bown had been on the register, and that it was a simple administrative error which meant his name had been removed.

But the Electoral Commission is pressing its case and, if legal costs are lumped on top, it could scupper the party's chances of fighting any kind of election.

UKIP sources believe it is unlikely to be decided in the courts that soon however, though there is definite nervousness over the situation.

Back in Peterborough there's a refreshingly unstage-managed feel to the hustings.

Argy bargy is allowed, even with our television cameras present, and the candidates are practically sitting in the laps of the faithful, the room is so small.

On tonight's evidence, whoever wins this contest will have a highly committed bunch of believers to capitalise on their current advantages.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE


TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Thursday, 19 November 2009

#729* - The GUARDIAN KEEPS AN EYE ON PEARSON'S EU GRANTS!

#729* - The GUARDIAN KEEPS AN EYE ON PEARSON'S EU GRANTS!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

The GUARDIAN KEEPS AN EYE ON LORD PEARSON'S EU GRANTS!
AS HE USES OUR MONEY TO PLANT FORESTS FOR PROFIT AND AS TERRORIST TRAINING I GUESS!



KEEPING AN EYE ON PROFITEERING
& HYPOCRACY


Anti-EU peer given Brussels grant

An arch Eurosceptic peer who believes that European Union subsidies are a "vast swindle" is financing replanting on his huge Scottish estate with grants from Brussels.

Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the independent Conservative peer who was expelled from the Tories by Michael Howard for backing the rival United Kingdom Independence Party, has tabled bills in the House of Lords demanding Britain's immediate withdrawal from the European Union.

He is also co-founder of the Global Britain thinktank which agitates against an "increasingly anachronistic" EU.

Last weekend he wrote in a pamphlet published by the independent thinktank Civitas that the EU was a "corrupt octopus" and was a success "only for those who make money out of it".

The 63-year-old peer called the EU system of grants and subsidies to farmers a "whole vast swindle" and said Britons were forced to pay "higher taxes" ... "to keep EU farmers in the style to which they have become accustomed".

He added that the United Kingdom gives the EU some £11bn a year: "Of this, they have been good enough to send back to us an average of some £7bn, always for projects which are designed to enhance their wretched image (including the Common Agricultural Policy)".

One of the projects now being funded with EU money is Sword Loch 3, a 300-acre forest on Lord Pearson's estate in Perthshire. According to the Forestry Commission, the official body responsible for protecting Britain's trees, this is one of a number of grants that it has given to Lord Pearson.

The latest £95,000 grant will be used to replant an old Caledonian pine forest, an ancient Scottish species which has been threatened with extinction.

"Half the money will come from the European Union," said a Forestry Commission spokesman.

Asked if Lord Pearson would know if it came from the EU, the spokesman said: "He would have applied to the Forestry Commission and might not be aware of it. However our literature does make it clear that part of the money for grants does come from the European Union".

Lord Pearson did not comment when contacted by the Guardian. Details of the grant were released under the Freedom of Information Act.

For some years, Lord Pearson has claimed that the BBC is institutionally biased in favour of the European Union, a point he sought to prove by publishing a report analysing the amount of time given to pro- and anti-EU speakers.

Lord Pearson loyally stood by his old Eton schoolfriend, Jonathan Aitken, after the former Tory minister perjured himself in his libel action over his links with the Saudis.

The peer is chairman of an insurance company and a supporter of the pro-hunting Countryside Alliance, serving as chairman of its deerstalking committee.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

It is strange to see Jonathan Aitken given so high a profile as a friend when he was chums with The Saudi's, meanwhile Lord Pearson is an award winning British Zionist and outspoken Islamaphobe!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

#728* - EUkip's SELF DESTRUCT BUTTON is ISLAM MISUNDERSTOOD!

#728* - EUkip's SELF DESTRUCT BUTTON is ISLAM MISUNDERSTOOD!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

EUkip's SELF DESTRUCT BUTTON is ISLAM MISUNDERSTOOD! AND OF COURSE AN EXTREMIST BRITISH ZIONIST AS FRONT RUNNER FOR LEADER!

Looking out for The BNP in Ermine 

VERY expensive blazers

May I suggest that anyone thinking of voting for Lord Wacko of Rannock just humour me with a quick look at a few links from this Zionist web site where he features as an Award Winner:
Google - "jerusalem summit"+"lord pearson"

Pearson is you will remember the all round nutter and alarmist racist extremist who claims of Muslims:
'THEY breed 10 times faster than US'!
Apart from being complete twaddle with absolutely no grounding in fact - whats with this 'them' and 'us' regime from a wannabe leader of a political party - he may be a Peer with an Eton schooling but clearly failed to get an education.

Even Margaret Thatcher had the smarts to use him in a back room role as a fund raiser, not risk giving him a crack at an MP's safe seat - safer for the Tories to take the money and when they had milked him dump him in obscurity in The House of Lords with all the other passed over pratts.

Just the chap to share his intellect with Gorbles Mick, and traitors like Lord Plum (no not the one in the library), Lord Kinnock of Family Gain, Lady Kinnock of poison dwarf, Lord Mandy of Little Boys, Lord Back Alley, Lady Ali By Brown Stuff, and the rest of the political scum that has had to be booted up to get rid of them.

Queen Rania Gets My Vote


Geert Wilders, Ukip and me

* Posted by Mehdi Hasan
* 17 October 2009 00:50

My row with the next leader of the UK Independence Party

This morning I engaged in a so-called "red-line" debate on Sky News about whether or not the right-wing Dutch Islamophobe and professional controversialist Geert Wilders is "welcome" in the UK. He is not. How can a man who views the faith of nearly two million British citizens and residents as a "totalitarian ideology" and a "retarded, dangerous one", and claims that "there is no such thing as 'moderate Islam'", be welcome in our multicultural, multiracial, multi-faith nation?

But what surrpised me was that the man I was debating -- who also happens to be the British parliamentarian who extended the original invitation to Wilders -- turned out to be Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the Ukip peer, and front-runner to succeed Nigel Farage as leader of the party. Pearson is an odious and reactionary Little Englander with Islamophobic leanings. He described, on air, "the problem with Islam", proclaimed his "fear" of Islam and claimed Islam was responsible for all the terrorism in the world.

And yet, regardless of that, I can't help but wonder what Pearson gets out of all this. Has Ukip gone from being a party of "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists, mostly" (to quote David Cameron), obsessed only with the European Union and issues of sovereignty and parliamentary democracy, to suddenly leading the neoconservative (and BNP-backed) campaign against the alleged "Islamisation" of Europe? Its endorsement of Wilders by extending an official invitation to him through its next leader is both strange and unpleasant.

On a side note, may I point out the most ridiculous part of the whole Wilders debate? It's the idea that this man is a champion of free speech and that allowing him entry into the UK exemplifies our commitment to free speech. Sorry. No. That's nonsense. This is a man who not only abuses free speech but also makes a mockery of it in his home country of Holland, where he has advocated the banning and outlawing of the Quran, which he ludicrously considers to be a "fascist" book. This is the man who hides his anti-Islamic bigotry behind the notion of free speech -- and campaigns against Muslims' own right to free speech by advocating the outlawing of the Muslim holy book. How ironic. And disgusting.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

#727* - EUkip's Peter REEVE IS IT SEEMS A LIAR

#727* - EUkip's Peter REEVE IS IT SEEMS A LIAR


Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

EUkip's EU Eastern Region Regional Organiser Peter REEVE IS IT SEEMS EITHER A LIAR OR A FOOL OR BOTH!

In The Huntingdon & St. Ives
News & Crier www.newsandcrier.co.uk
of Thursday 12-Nov-2009 CLICK HERE

There is a remarkably unsound article about EUkip on page 7.

Clearly the journalist could not be bothered checking the facts and just swallowed the opportunist, misleading and thus thoroughly dishonest misrepresentation of the truth.

Clearly the journalist has been 'sloppy' in not checking but has swallowed the opportunist and dishonest misrepresentation put forward on an opportunist bully, liar and cheat Peter Reeve an all round self seeking low life.

Peter Reeve lays claim to have been some sort of whistleblower!!!

May I draw it to the ghastly little oiks attention that at the time this matter was brought to the attention of the Police in 2005 I understand he lived in Ballantine St, Newton Heath, Manchester and remained in Manchester until taking up employ as Regional Organiser for Tom Wise EUkip MEP taking over from Charley Cole who was retiring.

I understand that falling out with Tom Wise fairly rapidly (he probably read back issues of The Sunday Telegraph by Daniel Foggo of 2 years earlier) One assumes that before taking up the job he had not had the wit or perspicacity to Google his new employer!

Had this duplicitous little man actually done the intelligent thing he would have been able to read the many column inches written by Daniel and supplied to the Bedfordshire Constabulary in October 2005, it may not have reached them till early November, I am a little hazey as it is some time since my first contacts with The Bedfordshire Police! Daniel may have a better record as he tends to keep remarkably detailed notebooks and tapes.

Peter Reeve comes across as an opportunist spiv but minded that that is the image he presents to most people of experience and any judgement why am I surprised. He and his ghastly mistress make a perfect pair symbolising the slide into the gutter of EUkip under the crass and incompetent leadership of Nigel Farage - as I predicted some dozen years ago.

Let us take the ridiculous leap of faith that Peter Reeve did 2 years after it was common knowledge that Tom Wise was involved in criminal behaviour stealing public money and EUkip was actively colluding in the criminality by orchestrating corrupt inquiries in an attempt to cover-up. Let us assume that Peter Reeve was so stupid as to think the police new nothing after 2 years!

OK Peter Reeve - did you report this to EUkip or did you only use your belatedly received information, having read the newspapers, to enhance your personal circumstances at someone else's expense, as on so many occasions since.

As a point of interest I wonder if Peter Reeve sees himself as a fool or as a liar.

Interestingly he was soon replaced by Tom Wise who found another, a fool and a liar, Peter Cole.

It is clear that for the sake of self aggrandisement Peter Reeve has either lied to The Huntingdon & St. Ives News & Crier or has deliberately misled them.

It is interesting that Peter Reeve, as a party official, seeks to make himself seem honest in the media by at best misleading them yet he is a part of that same management team that actively bullied and attacked John West for doing exactly what Peter Reeve dishonestly claims to have done. It is interesting that he stood bye a coward and a criminal to his core when the likes of McGough, Bob Feel Martinis, Mark Croucher and others were openly attacking me on a party read Forum yet this cowardly criminal was too dishonest and too gutless to step forward and tell people he KNEW that I was right and Tom Wise was, as I claimed guilty.

You will note that Jeffrey Titford colluded in the criminality because what Peter Reeve may not have realised I knew, he had gone to Titford and demanded that Titford employ him shortly after taking up employ with Tom Wise - a job he quit after his first pay cheque. I have no witness to my belief that he obtained his job by blackmail but he effected that transfer on the grounds that Tom Wise had been acting criminally and laid it on fairly thick that he had, HE CLAIMED, moved in good faith with someones family from Manchester.

Clearly Jeffrey Titford believed him and effected the transfer. I therefore ask why now we know Peter Reeve did not whistle blow but enhanced his career on exploitation of the matter - let us now consider why Jeffrey Titford opted to collude in Tom Wise's criminality by failing to denounce the crime and the criminal?

In the light of these facts and the absolute certainty Peter Reeve's press claims show us that EUkip leadership knew for certain that Tom Wise had been stealing tax payer's money - they even accepted the movement of a senior employee BECAUSE of it.

This leads me to deduce that EUkip leadership is endemically corrupt and dishonest. One is forced to consider whether this is because as Mike Nattrass stated at an NEC meeting when it was proposed in 2005 that the party hand Tom Wise over to the authorities Nattrass, who as an MEP then and as deputy leader stated "You can't do that how the f**k do you think we all get our money"! An astonishing confession of criminality by a man who is currently under investigation for fraudulent abuse of tax payer's money.

Michael Nattrass is currently standing for leadership of EUkip - it does rather look as if the corruption is endemic as we know Gerard Batten is beyond all doubt dishonest and corrupt - not just as Farage calls him 'that f****** telephone salesman' when he tells all who will listen that he employs his brother in law and has his printing done by another family member, neither of which details can I vouch for, however I am happy to confirm he is a dishonourable and dishonest individual and clearly a racist at the core of the fact that there is a very large section of EUkip that is in any terms nothing more than TheBNP in blazers.

IF you wish to help get the truth about EU politics in the public domain do send the author of the article in the News & Crier Chris Havel an 'e'Mail on:
chris.havergal@cambridge-news.co.uk
and let him know this article is here, with rather better informed facts since I have been in regular contact with Daniel Foggo and supplied the original story when Petrina Holdsworth, the chairman of the Party in 2005, was refused the right to clean up the party and was outright lied to by Roger Knapman the leader at the time - clearly leaving Petrina Holdsworth with absolutely no choice but to resign for the sake of her reputation.

There was no shortyage of people Roger Knapman could call on to collude in the criminality of Tom Wise and his efforts to cover-up the crime including Jeffrey Titford who took the role of Chairman to aid the cover-up, then later Trevor Colman orchestrated a cover-up for Knapman seemingly in return for his position as an MEP etc. etc.


TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Sunday, 15 November 2009

#726* - MA ZUCKERMAN SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIMSELF

#726* - MA ZUCKERMAN SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIMSELF

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

MA ZUCKERMAN SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIMSELF as PARTY SECRETARY, SOLICITOR & RETURNING OFFICER!

Hi,

astonishingly Vote Gerald Batten blog carries the story below and despite saying:

Michael Zuckerman should be ashamed of himself

It does look a bit as if Vote Batten Blog had not actually realised the full enormity of what has happened!
First, as with any EUkip election there was an attempt to fudge the issue based on an attempt to spin the issue which as ever was, just as with Farage, Fuller, Croucher and the other pond life was a pack of nonsense (note benefit of the doubt, most people call this sort of behaviour dishonest!).

For heaven's sake the Returning Officer, a solicitor with his own waste paper basket and a cosy little room at Mssrs. Bent & Manure (well think about it so Benson denotes the street and MAZure is clearly MA Zucherman's initials - this is no way for a Party Secretary to behave - it is on a par with the dishonesty and corruption of Douglas Denny at the last leadership election!

You will remember that Douglas Denny was de-selected (CHUCKED OUT) as Returning Officer for his dishonesty, on the majority vote of The NEC - and rightly so.

Sunday, 15 November 2009

Michael Zuckerman should be ashamed of himself

01. Mr Zuckerman banned all campaigning on the UKIP internal Forum to no particular purpose other than to shelter them from the real world and explaining and justifying the indefensible.

02. Mr Zuckerman banned all forms of Poll on the forum.

03. Mr Zuckerman in answer to complaints from candidates and members regarding Nigel Farage’s gross intervention on National tv in the leadership election said he had no undue interest in any particular candidate and was at liberty to exercise his right to state his opinion!

04. Mr Zuckerman was more than stumped when it was pointed out that Mr. Farage did in fact have an interest and a large interest as he had acted as the best known proposer to feature on the lengthy list of supporters Malcolm Wood had put together for Lord Pearson!

Mr Zuckerman had to concede he clearly didn’t know what he was taking about.

05. Mr Zuckerman assured the candidates that he would convey their annoyance and ensure that it did not happen again, and that Nigel Farage would be left in no doubt he had transgressed the rules.

And how has Greg Lance-Watkins got hold of articles from our UKIP members only forum? I thought that site was secure. I won't be posting that however as Gerard would not want me to.


To view the original article on Vote Gerard Batten CLICK HERE

I do think Vote Gerard Batten blog site have rather under estimated the gravity of the situation in view of the facts!

Minded that Malcolm Pearson made a side swipe at an apology at The Birmingham Hustings that did little to pour oil on very troubled waters - Pearson did promise he had had stiff words with Farage and it wouldn't happen again - so much for Pearson's control over the party as a potential leader!

Then MA Zuckerman also promises harsh words and in delicto flagrante we see Farage totally out of control, no doubt at the risk to his access to the feeding troughs of Brussels and Strasburgh being threatened!

The staggering diatribe Farage has had posted for him on the members and watchers Forum is quite staggering - if you haven't got access to the forum in your own right or a members details then see the details at:
CLICK HERE

Such flagrant disregard and arrogant contempt for decent behaviour is staggering he just makes both Pearson and Zuckerman look like the irrelevant dweebs he clearly believes them to be.

Farage has told so very many lies one even has to ask oneself if he has spoken to anyone or is just in a panic that he might have to pay the £3/4Million debt he has incurred for the party out of his own slush fund!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK