Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
EUkip ITS LIARS & SOCK MUPPETS SEEMINGLY FUNDED AND CONTROLLED TO SUPPORT THE RACIST PR EU ANTI JEWISH EFD!
Hi,
I thought I would dispel the myths and lies of Mark Croucher who is now paid by the EU to promote the racist, anti Jewish, xenophobic, advocates and practicioners of violence of the Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping which is largely pro EU membership many of whose members voted FOR the NEW CONSTITUTION of the EU called The Lisbon Treaty.
Mark Croucher and various other liars and dissemblers like Stuart Parr and various sock muppets supporting Nigel Farage in many cases for money as hired praise singers and even some who have believed the lies, the spin and the betrayal of these United Kingdoms by EUkip as it is propagandised by the collective scum of the EFD.
Please note below is a comment put on Nikki Sinclaire's web site in July 2009 which I whole heartedly endorse.
Following that is an outline of The EFD - which I unequivocally repudiate.
You may have noticed, despite the lies and spin of Mark Croucher and his muppets that I have never in well over a dozen years of supporting UKIP, I have NEVER materially and wittingly lied or misled ANYONE. They are unable to find an instance when I have so much as altered my position of implacable opposition to membership of the EU and furthermore every action I have taken has been at my own and of course Lee's expense.
Whilst sordid little people in EUkip betrayed our Country for personal gain, in some cases huge personal gain I have received 2 cheques for £100 each from private individuals and a replacement computer when mine was indubitably damaged by the agents of the authorities.
To return to the EFD saga - in August I announced my belief that Nikki Sinclaire would be likely to part company with The EFD on principle and ethical grounds, in the light of having read a little of the Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping that was in its early stages - I cautioned it would be an error and damaging to UKIP if Farage was allowed to indulge himself by forming the Party group.
About a week before the start of the new session of the new Parliament I made it clear I believed that Sinclaire would not sell out her moral principles and that I hoped EUkip would have sufficient honourable MEPs to force Farage to reconsider - Sadly EUkip does not have a single solitary honourable MEP now that Sinclaire has left and they have all sold out any principles they MAY have had.
Without exception EUkip MEPs are scum, mostly more stupid but clearly no less unethical and dishonest, corrupt and self serving than TheBNP who Mark Croucher and Nigel Farage went to such lengths to raise the profile of during the EU elections and before - now we see why, now they have formed a Pan EU Political Party EFD group more racist even than The VILE BNP.
It may interest or embarrass you to know that every step of the slide into the gutter was predicted in some accuracy a dozen years - I even stated that in a desparate last ditch attempt EUkip would take a populist lurch to seek the support of the lowest common denominator - and indeed there can not be a person of honour and integrity who is not disgusted by EUkip's lurch to racism and their transparent bid for the gutter of politics rivaling The BNP for the 'knee jerk' racist vote with their vociferous and offensive braying at 1,000 to 1,500 women who, some through choice others through it being forced upon them, wear the Burqa, Niqab or Hijab.
This is just following in the footsteps of The Nazi Party in the 1920s & 30s when they stirred up hatred against Jews to elevate themselves - Like the Nazi Party EUkip got elected on promises it has rneged on falsehoods that it built on and principles it does not have and just like the Nazi Party it changed its tune and the rules once elected to do all it could to stay in power or in the case of EUkip stay with their snouts in the best troughs on the Gravy Train - regardless of morality.
You may remember that as a result of close following of EUkip I predicted Sinclaire's moves - frequently before she made them. I published her meeting with Pearson for dinner within hours of Farage knowing, I published Pearson's comments shortly after he had told Farage. I predicted Farage's lies and temper tantrum rather embarrassingly about a day before he had them (he is very very predictable!) I published his vile attempt at blackmail and that he had admitted that Croucher was employed to scurry round the gutters picking up any crumb to keep Farage in office - including blackmail.
You will remember I published Sinclaire's bankruptcy shortly after it had happened - Croucher to try to impress his master resurected this old and irrelevant history. A sordid little man utterly without morality who has shown he is prepared to prostitute himself in any gutter be it Searchlight and its anti democratic criminality or the Racist and anti Jewish EFD.
You will note I published Farage's behaviour throughout and it was clear it would come to a head at the first NEC meeting in January which I predicted about 14 days before hand - And it did having been picked up on shortly after by Junius.
In desparation whilst £Millions have gone missing in EUkip and Farage admitted to personally profiting by about £2 million and 100s of £1,000s have seemingly been perloined the fatuous Croucher has conversations with lap tops to generate a desparate attempt to try to dream up some conspiracy over the collection of funds suggested by me and managed largely by Niall Warry - Croucher's efforts to build a case has been risible - not least as it was NOT public money, every single person who domated was entirely happy and it was absolutely none of this vile little 'Peeping Tom's' business.
Clearly there was no material inpropriety and no one ever believed there was but the sordid little Croucher has tried to imply there was some sort of impropriety - he and those who are paid in one form or another were the only contributors to the thread who kept this dead topic alive 20,000 viewings and 873 postings and not a single solitary example of material impropriet can you or your muppets show - NOT ONE so there have been 20,000 viewings that have had the opportunity to see you for the unpleasant weedling little liar you are - Well done, how do you imagine that has done anything but harm UKIP and oh so typical of EUkip.
Stand back and try to empathise whith how an honourable man of some integrity might view the postings of yourself, Douglas Denny, Mahoney, Baron, Septic, and the other EUkip supporting muppets with their vile language, anally retentive obsessions, offensive uncorroborated attacks and serial dishonesty - just how can such unpleasant people consistently and unpleasantly abusing private individuals show EUkip for anything but the untrustworthy, dishonourable gutter snipes they quite clearly are.
Do you believe this enhances membership or its caliber?
Here is Nikki Sinclaire's commentary on the odious EFD - sheduled to become Farage's vehicle when it becomes a fully fledged Pan EU Political Party in November when EUkip collapses in ruins due to the massive debts Farage has incurred with his posturing and dishonesty - particularly appropos The Electoral Commission - just how will the party fund the £1.2 million or so debt Farage and Andrew Smith with help from some bit players have EARNED.
Nikki's previous statement, Brussels, 1st July 2009
Nikki is guided by the goal and principle of the UK withdrawing from the EU.
In her work to achieve the above she will constantly be reviewing her actions and associations and will endeavour to make the right decisions.
EUROPE of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY
The Group Political Platform
The Group is open to Members that subscribe to a Europe of Freedom and Democracy and acknowledge the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and parliamentary democracy.In her work to achieve the above she will constantly be reviewing her actions and associations and will endeavour to make the right decisions.
EUROPE of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY
The Group Political Platform
The Group subscribes to the following programme:
1. Freedom and co-operation among people of different States
Committed to the principles of democracy, freedom and co-operation among Nation States, the Group favours an open, transparent, democratic and accountable co-operation among sovereign European States and rejects the bureaucratisation of Europe and the creation of a single centralised European superstate.
2. More democracy and respect of People’s will
Convinced that the legitimate level for democracy lies with the Nation States, their regions and parliaments since there is no such thing as a single European people; the Group opposes further European integration (treaties and policies) that would exacerbate the present democratic deficit and the centralist political structure of the EU. The Group favours that any new treaties or any modification of the existing treaties are to be submitted to the peoples’ vote through free and fair national referenda in the Member States. The Group does believe that the legitimacy of any power comes from the will of its Peoples and their right to be free and democratically ruled.
3. Respect for Europe’s history, traditions and cultural values
Peoples and Nations of Europe have the right to protect their borders and strengthen their own historical, traditional, cultural and religious values. The Group rejects xenophobia, anti-Semitism and any other form of discrimination.
4. Respect for national differences and interests: Freedom of votes
Agreeing on embodying these principles in its proceedings, the Group respects the freedom of its delegations and Members to vote as they see fit.
SINCLAIRE's more recent posting on her web site
19th January 2010
Why UKIP should leave the Europe of Freedom and Democracy (EFD) Group
The Case for withdrawal
1. UKIP MEPs were elected to represent UKIP and to pursue the argument for EU withdrawal
We stood for election on a platform of principle and clarity. We were elected as UKIP and to fight for withdrawal from the EU. We should stay true to that. We were not elected to join to support the Parliament's agenda and certainly not to work alongside those against withdrawal. You elected UKIP but have got EFD.
2. By sitting with MEPs who are against withdrawal we are compromising our case
In the eyes of the European Parliament and many observers we are seen as EFD and not UKIP. Yet all EFD members, except UKIP, are working hard to make the EU better. They do not want withdrawal. They would not allow the word ‘withdrawal’ or 'independence' to be used in the Group’s mission statement. We are therefore part of a coalition that waters down and even contradicts our original position. We compromise both our principles and our action.
3. EFD helps the EU to work; we should not be doing that
Few people in UKIP understand the extent to which the Party has been subsumed within the group. EFD wants to make the European Parliament stronger. It wants the EU to work better. It argues for constructive reform. On a day-to-day basis it often supports the introduction of directives and policies to expand EU power. The Co-presidents,Lega Nord, call for a single European policy on immigration. UKIP should be on the opposite side – arguing against reform and for abolition.
4. EFD includes some very strange bedfellows
The group contains parties who have a variety of extremist views which includes racism, anti-Semitism and violence. One of these parties, Lega Nord was removed from the last EU group to which UKIP belonged, Indpendence & Democracy (Ind Dem), because of their extremist views. Despite this history, they are now Co-Presidents ofEFD and hold the power of veto on Nigel Farage.
Political Editor and commentator, Seamus Milne, on the Politics Show (16th January 2010) described Lega Nord as "vicious" and said that we “were in bed with some very ugly people.”
In a BBC interview, Nikki Sinclaire MEP and Mike Nattrass MEP were asked, if UKIP was not a racist party why we were linked up to parties like Lega Nord who advocated shooting and sinking ships full of immigrants and also called African immigrants ‘ Bingo Bongos’? A Lega Nord member was convicted of setting alight an immigrant's belongings, endangering their life.
5. EFD compromises our position both in Brussels and in Britain
UKIP has to water down its words and tactics in Brussels so as not to upset other members of EFD who take the reformist, anti-withdrawal line. And EFD will only back UKIP in Britain when UKIP promotes arguments that fall short of outright withdrawal. Leading Economics Professor, Tim Congdon stated in late 2009 that he was very disappointed to see the extent to which UKIP MEPs "had been 'captured' in the sense of not seeing that their job was in Britain, not in Brussels or Strasbourg." UKIP leader, Lord Pearson also recently stated that "our role in Britain is what matters not the European Parliament."
6. It is a myth that we benefit financially from EFD membership
It is claimed that Group membership brings with it money for UKIP. This is completely false. First it would be illegal to pass this money to UKIP. It is for the use of EFD and very restrictive rules apply. Secondly the budget follows MEPs whatever group they are in. If one joins the non-aligned, the EU monies allocated are slightly less but at least you can be in charge of all your allocation. In some instances, there would be fewer restrictions. For example, the UKIP logo could be prominently used with the party and MEP's name. In the first six months of this parliament, the West Midlands' region has not received one penny from the EFD, yet both MEPs would have had over £40,000 to use in that period had they been non-aligned.
7. Being in EFD gets us more media coverage
Neither the public nor most journalists have ever heard of EFD. Our media coverage results from what UKIP, its MEPs and campaigners do and say. When Nigel appears on TV, it is as UKIP. It should also be noted that Tory MEP, Daniel Hannan received more press attention as a non-aligned member than Nigel Farage did when they both attacked Gordon Brown.
8. Because the EFD group is a precursor to a full Pan European political party
The current proposal on the table for UKIP MEPs in Brussels is for UKIP to join such a party to conform to the EU plan to entrench the federalist Euro-state:a President, a Foreign Secretary, Flag, Anthem, Police Force, Army, Parliament, MEPs and pan-European political parties. We should do as the electorate told us to do and SAY NO to European Union and to those apparata that help them to remove our sovereignty and our British identity.
1. UKIP MEPs were elected to represent UKIP and to pursue the argument for EU withdrawal
We stood for election on a platform of principle and clarity. We were elected as UKIP and to fight for withdrawal from the EU. We should stay true to that. We were not elected to join to support the Parliament's agenda and certainly not to work alongside those against withdrawal. You elected UKIP but have got EFD.
2. By sitting with MEPs who are against withdrawal we are compromising our case
In the eyes of the European Parliament and many observers we are seen as EFD and not UKIP. Yet all EFD members, except UKIP, are working hard to make the EU better. They do not want withdrawal. They would not allow the word ‘withdrawal’ or 'independence' to be used in the Group’s mission statement. We are therefore part of a coalition that waters down and even contradicts our original position. We compromise both our principles and our action.
3. EFD helps the EU to work; we should not be doing that
Few people in UKIP understand the extent to which the Party has been subsumed within the group. EFD wants to make the European Parliament stronger. It wants the EU to work better. It argues for constructive reform. On a day-to-day basis it often supports the introduction of directives and policies to expand EU power. The Co-presidents,Lega Nord, call for a single European policy on immigration. UKIP should be on the opposite side – arguing against reform and for abolition.
4. EFD includes some very strange bedfellows
The group contains parties who have a variety of extremist views which includes racism, anti-Semitism and violence. One of these parties, Lega Nord was removed from the last EU group to which UKIP belonged, Indpendence & Democracy (Ind Dem), because of their extremist views. Despite this history, they are now Co-Presidents ofEFD and hold the power of veto on Nigel Farage.
Political Editor and commentator, Seamus Milne, on the Politics Show (16th January 2010) described Lega Nord as "vicious" and said that we “were in bed with some very ugly people.”
In a BBC interview, Nikki Sinclaire MEP and Mike Nattrass MEP were asked, if UKIP was not a racist party why we were linked up to parties like Lega Nord who advocated shooting and sinking ships full of immigrants and also called African immigrants ‘ Bingo Bongos’? A Lega Nord member was convicted of setting alight an immigrant's belongings, endangering their life.
5. EFD compromises our position both in Brussels and in Britain
UKIP has to water down its words and tactics in Brussels so as not to upset other members of EFD who take the reformist, anti-withdrawal line. And EFD will only back UKIP in Britain when UKIP promotes arguments that fall short of outright withdrawal. Leading Economics Professor, Tim Congdon stated in late 2009 that he was very disappointed to see the extent to which UKIP MEPs "had been 'captured' in the sense of not seeing that their job was in Britain, not in Brussels or Strasbourg." UKIP leader, Lord Pearson also recently stated that "our role in Britain is what matters not the European Parliament."
6. It is a myth that we benefit financially from EFD membership
It is claimed that Group membership brings with it money for UKIP. This is completely false. First it would be illegal to pass this money to UKIP. It is for the use of EFD and very restrictive rules apply. Secondly the budget follows MEPs whatever group they are in. If one joins the non-aligned, the EU monies allocated are slightly less but at least you can be in charge of all your allocation. In some instances, there would be fewer restrictions. For example, the UKIP logo could be prominently used with the party and MEP's name. In the first six months of this parliament, the West Midlands' region has not received one penny from the EFD, yet both MEPs would have had over £40,000 to use in that period had they been non-aligned.
7. Being in EFD gets us more media coverage
Neither the public nor most journalists have ever heard of EFD. Our media coverage results from what UKIP, its MEPs and campaigners do and say. When Nigel appears on TV, it is as UKIP. It should also be noted that Tory MEP, Daniel Hannan received more press attention as a non-aligned member than Nigel Farage did when they both attacked Gordon Brown.
8. Because the EFD group is a precursor to a full Pan European political party
The current proposal on the table for UKIP MEPs in Brussels is for UKIP to join such a party to conform to the EU plan to entrench the federalist Euro-state:a President, a Foreign Secretary, Flag, Anthem, Police Force, Army, Parliament, MEPs and pan-European political parties. We should do as the electorate told us to do and SAY NO to European Union and to those apparata that help them to remove our sovereignty and our British identity.
To see the original on her web site CLICK HERE
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment