#554* - EUkip DISHONESTY & THE COURTS

#554* - EUkip DISHONESTY & THE COURTS

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

EUkip DISHONESTY & THE COURTS GIVES EVERY IMPRESSION THEY ARE IDIOTS - JUVENILE & IRRESPONSIBLE!


Hi,

doing a bit of tidying up having checked out the progress of EUkip's MEP & Staff in the Criminal Courts with Tom Wise and Lindsay Jenkins (See Next Blog #553), I felt an update on the other Court case was apposite.

You may remember that EUkip was taken to Court by The Electoral Commission for their deliberate dishonesty and were found GUILTY.

You may recall that Nigel Farage, David Lott & Andrew Smith were well aware almost from the get go of the offence that the offence had been committed I gather others including John Wittaker were aware of the offence also and all had more than ample opportunity to solve the problem without cost.

Despite this in a particularly childish move on the part of those in the know they decided to enter something of a *ick Measuring competition with The Electoral Commission - eventually after a number of ever escallating irresponsibilities on the part of EUkip and refusals to either acquiesce to the law or negotiate their position it was shown that EUkip were deeply unimpressive weenie wagglers.

EUkip were found GUILTY but Tim Workman, presumably after consultation with the plaintiff, sentenced EUkip to the nominal forfeiture of £18,000 which was far short of the £350,000 forfeiture the law would seem to determine as non optional.

EUkip - ever the idiots decided to make utter fools of themselves and were rude to all who had shown leniency!

This left The Electoral Commission in the envidious position that they could not, with mature responsible adults, complete the case honour having been determined by the guilty verdict but wisdom having been shown by leniency - as was intended.

El.Com were left with no choice but to appeal - a process which they downgraded to simplify matters and reduce costs and additional risk for EUkip to being a Judicial Review.

The Judicial Review was never at any stage regarding the verdict but regarding the sentence!

The Judge, if you read the Judgement, was utterly evicerating to Workman on his sentencing but left Tim Workman, head of the Westminster Magistrates Court bench, with a vague shred of dignity stating that 'The Court at Horseferry Road under Workman was not a Court of 'record' and thus it was not possible to establish just how he had come up with his sentence' - one wonders if a judge has ever been so unequivocal in relation to chastisement of a senior Magistrate before!

The case was 'politely' returned to the Bench of Workman for reconsideration - NOT of his verdict but of his sentence! The law as it is drawn up would seem to show that he has no choice but to insist on a full refund of the monies which EUkip received unlawfully as proven by the undisputed guilty verdict.

This case STILL has not come back to the bench - many will have assumed (as did I) that it had been set aside until after the elections on political consideration.

Subsequent to a prolongued phone conversation yesterday I am now able to inform you that EUkip has set out to appeal The Judicial Review verdict! This is somewhat strange, in my opinion, there would seem not to be any effort to appeal the Guilty verdict, merely the Judicial Review verdict.

I find it hard to see a way in which EUkip can see itself as in a position, at this very late stage, to achieve anything but further financial damage. The judge in his review set aside apportionment of costs which seemed to save EUkip much risk!

As yet there is no clear allocation of date and the case is somewhat messy it seems as the case was originally Electoral Commission vs. EUkip with Alan Bowne ex parte.

EUkip was found GUILTY and ordered to forfeit £18,000 or so out of a potential of £350,000 AND costs!

That EUkip then made fools of themselves - Farage particularly has now led to a position of risk which has just been hugely escallated - as I understand it the appeal of a Judicial Review would seem to predicate a full blown and potentially very costly High Court action - with the downside risk of not only forfeiture of some £350,000 but with almost unlimited risks pertaining to costs as the Judicial Review was between El.Com. & The Magistrates Courts NOT involving EUkip other than either ex parte or Alan Bowne ex parte I am unsure which.

One has to wonder at which NEC this was discussed and on what advice as Zucherman, although proclaimed as a solicitor is particularly unprofessional and far from competent - he has shown he has absolutely no understanding of copywrite or internet law - not even aware as to what is civil law and what criminal - further he is a fool incompetent to control either his temper or his language - currently being subject to a complaint via his Union (The Law Society) to The Ombudsman! Michael Zucherman is also embroilled in a complaint under the law of Witness Intimidation which I understand is embroilled in an OLAF enquiry passed to OLAF by The British Police. Or so I understand.

Perhaps if you wish to clarify the position regarding The Court Case you might care to call the Courts on 0845 - 601 3600 - may I suggest you start out with 'Listings' and follow the trail of El.Com. vs. Magistrates Court and ensuring you are adequately informed to ask the right questions you may establish the facts for yourself.

Anyone with further substantive information perhaps they can provide same and I will publish it here - trying to keep up with the machinations, spin and frequently lies of EUkip is more than somewhat taxing ;-)

I freely admit I may make mistakes but I try to be accurate on every detail and thus to date in over 500 entries on this Blog Site I have NEVER yet made an error of consequence and have only ONCE been asked to make a correction which was achieved after two phone calls for me to check the new facts. There has been ONE other case where I was asked to make an alteration however when I checked the new claimed facts it exposed further damaging information on a EUkip MEP - similarly EUkip made much bluster during the recent election on ONE issue which they were unable to substantiate and I declined to alter my text to pander to their dishonest spin.

There is absolutely no doubt amongst the informed who have morality and integrity that EUkip is unfit for purpose on almost all counts.


TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU