The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
EUkip IN SUCH A MESS - EVEN NATTRASS IS PUT FORWARD!!
Hi,
I was ferreting through some of my archive material a while back and remembered this letter received by all NEC members at the time (and of course myself, though my copy was second hand ;-)
Minded of the crass stupidit, intenperate behaviour and farcical incompetence of Mick Nattrass it is astonishing to think this bad tempered semie literate clown could be seriously considered as one of a mere 6 candidates for leader of EUkip - just consider his total lack of achievement as he has enriched himself at the expense of Britain as an MEP - Can ANYONE state a single achievement or action of intelligence from this bufoon!
This is the sad chappie who due to his support for the criminality of Tom Wise stated at the NEC meeting 'What the **** do you think we should do - if he goes down we all will how the hell do you think we get our money'.
This is the sad mysogenistic fool who did all in his power to remove Petrina Holdsworth because he Farage and others feared her determination to try to introduce transparency - shortly afterwards we had the vile and duplicitous Croucher spinning his lies and claims that Petrina Holdsworth had exposed Tom Wise's fraud because she was refused the money - EUkip's low life MEPs even went so far as to collude in a plot to claim she was at a meeting which she did not attend and fortunately I was able to PROVE her absence!
Nattrass was the dangerous underhand little chappie whose 'e'Mails were conveniently leaved to me and to The Sunday Telegraph to try to sabotage the Party Chairman - EUkip must be desperate if they would want this duplicitous and useless article as leader.
This is the callibre of MEP EUkip has is there any wonder Farage can force them to his self serving and mallign personal interests.
Nattrass could barely run a bath on his own let alone a party - thus I presume is the reason for a need for an official bath runner at his accomodation in Brussels.
Minded of the crass stupidit, intenperate behaviour and farcical incompetence of Mick Nattrass it is astonishing to think this bad tempered semie literate clown could be seriously considered as one of a mere 6 candidates for leader of EUkip - just consider his total lack of achievement as he has enriched himself at the expense of Britain as an MEP - Can ANYONE state a single achievement or action of intelligence from this bufoon!
This is the sad chappie who due to his support for the criminality of Tom Wise stated at the NEC meeting 'What the **** do you think we should do - if he goes down we all will how the hell do you think we get our money'.
This is the sad mysogenistic fool who did all in his power to remove Petrina Holdsworth because he Farage and others feared her determination to try to introduce transparency - shortly afterwards we had the vile and duplicitous Croucher spinning his lies and claims that Petrina Holdsworth had exposed Tom Wise's fraud because she was refused the money - EUkip's low life MEPs even went so far as to collude in a plot to claim she was at a meeting which she did not attend and fortunately I was able to PROVE her absence!
Nattrass was the dangerous underhand little chappie whose 'e'Mails were conveniently leaved to me and to The Sunday Telegraph to try to sabotage the Party Chairman - EUkip must be desperate if they would want this duplicitous and useless article as leader.
This is the callibre of MEP EUkip has is there any wonder Farage can force them to his self serving and mallign personal interests.
Nattrass could barely run a bath on his own let alone a party - thus I presume is the reason for a need for an official bath runner at his accomodation in Brussels.
04 October 2005
Dear NEC Member
I was approached by Roger Knapman to rescind my resignation as Chairman on
the basis that Roger was willing to remove Nattrass from the Deputy
Leadership for his recent behaviour.
I agreed to that .
Roger then told me that it would be very difficult to remove it forthwith
as the conferences were so close in time with all the attendant publicity
plus the fact that Nattrass was co -hosting the I&D Group Conference.I was
left in no doubt however that it would be removed by Roger after the
conferences.
I therefore agreed to that.
In the meantime he said that he would obtain a letter from the other MEPs
apologising for Nattrass`s behaviour .He stated that the letter was to be
put on our website.
(As you know the letter has been signed by the other MEPs and a copy
circulated to the NEC members.)
In the meantime Nattrass had issued another intemperate email on the 2nd
October at 10.48.I telephoned Roger about this who indicated that Nattrass
would have to go forthwith as he had now " cut his own throat" . I telephoned Roger later that day but he was unavailable.
I then spoke with Piers that evening ( 2nd of October ) who had no
knowledge of any further action having been taken by Roger and we agreed
that a short holding statement should be put on the web.
We agreed that the next day the MEPs letter would be put on the web,or at
least a reference to the MEP`s letter would be added to the statement. I sent two emails later that evening pointing out that there was no
reference to Nattrass in the letter, which was not acceptable, and amongst
other things I drew Roger`s attention to the fact that the question of the
removal of Nattrass`s Deputy Leadership seemed to be slipping still further
as Graham Booth had rung me that evening to say that Roger would simply be
informing Nattrass that his Deputy Leadership was now dependant on his
future good conduct.
I went to London on the 3rd of October .On my return in the afternoon I
noted that the MEPs letter was still not on the website contrary to my
agreement with Roger and Piers.In deed nothing had been added to the short
holding statement .
I emailed a copy of the letter to Stuart Gulleford and asked him to have a
word with Piers out of courtesy before putting it on the website.
That evening I spoke to Stuart to ask why it was still not on the website.He
told me that orders had come "from the top "
to stop it going up.
I rang Roger and we had our first acrimonious exchange .
He refused to allow the letter on the website .He indicated that he did not
want to remove Nattrass`s Deputy Leadership .I pointed out that I felt
Roger had not kept to his word on either topic and that I felt betrayed.
By the end of the evening it had been agreed that the question of the Deputy
Leadership would be dealt with at the next meeting of the NEC . Roger said that Nigel had agreed to raise the topic.I agreed to that as a
final position although I viewed it as a weak option .
I hope that Nigel will not mind me adding that he was sympathetic to the
position which I found myself in .
I asked Roger to put our latest agreement in writing to me as I was fed up
with him changing the position so arbitrarily and frequently. He agreed and said that Piers would send me an email confirming the position
this morning.
No email has been forthcoming .
I have formed the view that I am no longer prepared to work under these
unacceptable circumstances .
I now strongly suspect that nothing will be done re the Deputy Leadership as
Roger has shown that he is not prepared to act decisively and to publicly
support his chairman. I only wish he had been clear with me in the first
place and then he would not have put the party in this mess.
I am left with no alternative in my view but to resign yet again as
Chairman of the Party and from the NEC in order to preserve my own
integrity and self respect.This time there can be no coming back under the
present regime .
I thank the huge amount of people who have contacted me over the last few
days to welcome me back but I cannot continue to act with the "rug being
pulled from under my feet"repeatedly.
I regret that I will not be attending the conferences this weekend.
Yours sincerely,
Petrina Holdsworth
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment