Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!
& JUNIUS ASSERTS Ralph ATKINSON IS FINISHED AS A EUkip MEP CANDIDATE - ISN'T THAT THE CASE FOR ALL OF THEM?
Hi,
It is not often that I copy a fellow blogger verbatim but in this instance Junius is ahead of me on this issue and I have no doubt correct.
I have conversed with the Junius team on this issue in the past as they and I were morally certain that EUkip in its proven corruption of the selection process would seek to remove a leading candidate to put Ma Zucherman in as he is almost orgasmic at the thought of the job and howmuch it will make him.
Ma Zucherman is in my opinion and that of others I speak with utterly corrupt and with little or no ethical understanding of either his chosen job as a solicitor nor his stepping stone to satiation of his greed as part secretary of EUkip and when you consider that was a job previously attempted by Douglas Denny and at one time the rather foolish and unimaginitive David Lott for a period - it can hardly be considered difficult!
I have seen several attempts at legal work by Ma Zucherman and without exception they have been crass, incompetent and almost as amateur as the fool Denny's pretences at legal understanding. Is it any wonder that small one man bands like Bent & Manure I apologise if in fact there is someone else in the firm but should that be the case surely Ma Zucherman's work should be overseen it is so shoddy and incompetent - this is a man who can not even differentiate between criminal and civil law!) it is no wonder he seeks a well paid job as an MEP as small incompetent firms are struggling and collapsing as the law moves ever more fanciful and reliant on large firms of competence and repute.
I had tended to ignore the Ralph Atkinson storyand several others as they fell into the realms of Non News, along the lines of 'Is the Pope a Catholic?', 'Is Bob F-M an ill informed, ill mannered aggresive fool?', 'Is Farage a womanising drunk and hopeless leader?'
Yes, if you consider EUkip's utterly corrupt selection process News, then mea culpa but then again it was I with Junius who provided EUkip's Returning Officer's Official Report for The NEC, as the corrupt NEC set out to hide the facts and dupe the candidates and members.
You will recall EUkip's own appointed Returning Officer clearly and unequivocally advocated that the process be run again and monitored by an outside agency as it had been so corrupted as to be implausible and untrustworthy.
It matters not how the party liars like Denny, Bob Feel Martinis, McGough and their ilk squirm and spin - they are liars to a man without grace, charm or competence that anyone would wish on an enemy let alone a friend - individuals beneath contempt. When critical and trying to denigrate me you will note they have with all their efforts found not a single fact more heinous than I have a pony tail - Unlike them I do not lie, nor dishonestly set out to misrepresent.
That said let us hear some facts from honest men - here is Junius' Blog regarding Ralp Atkinson:
Ralph Atkinson's fate is sealed:
The letter that Paul Nuttall and David Challice did not want you to see!
Ralph Atkinson's fate would appear to be sealed, with the circulation of the following letter which seems to incriminate him in the forgery of an e-mail purporting to have been sent by David 'don't mention the underpants' Challice to Paul 'just call me Benito' Nuttall.
His position as a prospective MEP is now untenable. An extraordinary meeting of (some) of the NEC plan to deselect him within days.
The big question is, with Fat Boy Dim out of the way, will Zuckerman - currently the subject of at least three serious complaints to the Law Society - move up to 2nd place on the London list, or is Farage preparing to parachute his old mucker from the pub into the soon to be vacant slot?
Paul Nuttall
UKIP Party Chairman
9th April 2009
Dear Paul Nuttall
As discussed, I have now seen the email that Ralph Atkinson claims to have received from Head Office, supplying him with an electronic version of the London database. Although I accept that it might be difficult to prove absolutely, I have no hesitation in stating that in my opinion (and also in the opinion of our Database Manager, Andrew Fear’s) this email is a forgery and did not come from anyone here in Head Office.
Firstly…………Had I sent such an email (which I did not) I would have begun it “Dear Ralph”, and not signed it off as: “David Challice, Office Manager etc… “ Ralph is well aware of who I am, and I would never have gone to the trouble of typing all that extra, just in an email.
Secondly………The general spacing of the email/letter is all wrong. On my own emails, I begin “Dear Bill Bloggs” and then hit return to drop down a line, as if writing a letter in long-hand.
Thirdly……….. As I have mentioned elsewhere, Andrew Fear is the only person at Head Office who ever sends out databases by email. On no occasion have I ever sent out a database electronically, so therefore it would not have been signed in my name, but in Andrew’s.
Fourthly……….When Andrew sends a database to the Regional Organisers, he always sends it in a “Winzipped” file for security reasons (also to compress it, making it easier to send). In Ralph Atkinson’s false email, the database appears as an “open” file, not winzip, and therefore did not come originate from here.
Finally……….. The damning clincher for us is that Ralph Atkinson has actually included in his forged email that we at Head Office had agreed to separate Members and Supporters from the other records contained on the London list. When Head Office sends it out, the database includes all categories including ex-members and enquirers. We do not split databases into just Members and Supporters, and had Ralph Atkinson requested it we would have refused, telling him to undertake the task himself, even had he received official clearance beforehand.
For the above reasons Head Office believes this email to be a forgery and that therefore Ralph Atkinson has deliberately tried to implicate Head Office in his own activities. For a possible MEP candidate to have behaved in such a manner bodes ill for the future and is worrying at best. Others may put it more strongly.
Yours sincerely
David Challice
If I were Gerard I would be VERY worried. Farage never wanted him as lead MEP candidate in London and is looking for any excuse to remove him in favour of Zuckerman.
Watch your back Gerard!
***END OF JUNIUS QUOTES***
To view the original of Junius' Blog CLICK HERE
PARAGRAPH THREE:
Thanks for the information - can someone pass on my thanks to Andrew Fear - I was wondering who had sent me the file with all those 'e'Mails and I have verified it is upto date. I can't be bothered going and getting it just at the moment but suffice to say I was surprised to note howmany member's names began with Z - it was 6 or 7 and Ma Zucherman was last on the list and the number of 'e'Mail addresses for members held by EUkip would seem to be 4**7.
Will the party be sending a copy of the BNP leaflet with Churchill on it to each of them? I was astonished a few weeks ago when I heard EUkip were going to emulate The BNP - right down to knuckle dragging bufoons surrounding their leader, bully boys, shaven headed enforcers and liars. Now even Churchill in his 'V for Victory' gesture and a duplicitous, underhand excrecence of a man emulating Churchill.
To display a sack of lard a liar and a cheat representing EUkip on a leaflet copied in style from The BNP tells voters all they need top know about EUkip under Farage's leadership - FINISHED!
Whether EUkip get Zero or 70 MEPs it is a catastophy for these United Kingdoms - if they get a single MEP it indicates that the British public have lost their values, their integrity and their understanding of morality.
Success for EUkip would show by just howmuch the standards in Britain have been debased - the higher the number the greater the shame.
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Posts
