UKIP-vs-EUkip

UKIP-vs-EUkip
CLICK THE PIC for More on UKIP

Wednesday 11 March 2009

#376* - EUkip & WHEN THIEVES FALL OUT!


#376* - EUkip & WHEN THIEVES FALL OUT!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

EUkip & WHEN THIEVES FALL OUT - WELL MORE WHEN LITTLE MEN FORM CHILDISH GANGS FOR PERSONAL GAIN!!


CC: alanbown@btinternet.com; cgill36@hotmail.co.uk; dcbdcbuk@yahoo.co.uk; douglas.denny@btopenworld.com; rjoxley@lineone.net; ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu

Subject: Email copy of a letter sent to M. Zuckerman

Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:32:23 +0000

Dear Mr Zuckerman,

Thank you for your letter dated 6th February 2009.I refer to my letter of 3rd February 2009 as you have chosen to ignore most of what I had to say in that letter.

Point 2 in letter dated 3/2/9. Ian Smith was clearly prejudiced against me prior to his sitting on the panel which decided to suspend me. I thank you for providing further evidence of his prejudice in the form of an email sent by Mr Smith to Stuart Gulleford on Monday, 10th November at 2.34 PM.

In this email he advises J. Titford to attempt to bankrupt me in order to prevent from standing for UKIP. Hardly the words of an impartial panel member.

I again refer you to rule 1.6 of the Discipline Panel. His failure to declare an interest completely invalidates the original decision of that panel.Point 4 in my letter dated 3/2/9. I again put you on notice that intimidation of a potential prosecution witness is a serious offence. If this continues I will report both you and J. Titford to The Law Society and the police.

I have already spoken to Suffolk Police who have confirmed that I should report the matter to them if this attempted intimidation continues.

I also reserve the right to take action against J.Titford or any member of UKIP through the disciplinary process of the party if they continue take part in these proceedings.

Point 5 to 8 in my letter dated 3/2/9. You have failed to declare an interest in this matter.

As I have already said this raises the question of your impartiality. In view of these complaints it is my submission that you are not sufficiently unbiased to supervise J. Titford`s complaint against me and you should hand over the conduct of the proceedings to an unbiased party.

I again put you on notice that I reserve the right to take action against you through the disciplinary processes of the party if you continue to supervise and take part in these proceedings.

I note in your letter dated 6/2/9 that you state I have “thus created a situation where there is nobody left to hold a disciplinary hearing to examine your conduct”.

On the contrary Mr Zuckerman it is you and the NEC that have created this situation be refusing to deal with any of my complaints. It was this abject failure to deal with these complaints that forced me to take the matter beyond UKIP.

I put you on notice for the last and final time that if you, J.Titford, the Discipline Panel or the NEC continue with this attempted intimidation of a potential prosecution witness I will make a formal complaint about UKIP to The Law Society and Suffolk Police.

Yours sincerely,
John West

It is astonishing to watch this grubby little gang of nere do wells falling over themselves to attack anyone who threatens their snouts in the troughs with the introduction of honesty, morality, transparency and decent behaviour as John West clearly has.

Well I rekon one thing is true - Douglas Denny & Jonathan Arnott rate Ma Zucherman as a pretty useless Lawyer and for details of their contempt for him CLICK HERE.

I must say I'm inclined to agree with them the man comes across as a two bit back street grubby little fixer - probably doing schlenter deals for landlords and buy to let domino builders! How to orchestrate the paperwork on a load of dodgey mortgages with self certified sub prime incomes sounds about his mark.

I note the foolish little man didn't take seriously either the fact that he had a PERSONAL vested interest in the John West Disciplinary and put the wheels in motion setting up a corrupt and unsound attack on John West.

So after much idiotic bluster from Ma Zucherman he set up a Kangaroo Court for Monday and he has suddenly read his teach yourself law or been lent a copy of law for dummies - or perhaps he has been officially cautioned or censured by The Law Society and at this late stage he has prorogued himself.

Since Ian Smith failed to declare an interest in the first complaint and Ma Zucherman failed to prorogue himself at the outset - clearly all stages of the disciplinary hearing are now legally null and void.

EUkip are a joke - what is a tragedy is they are legally allowed to solicit for Votes and con the British peoples!

EUkip are now in serious trouble because if they fail to respond to the letters they have from John West's Solicitors by due date they stand the risk of a writ of Mandamus which will leave them having to run the entire MEP selection and election again throughout Britain using an outside agency and THEN the risk of a Judicial Review!

This would almost deffinitely preclude them from standing on June 4th. - all because of total incompetence and lack of common sense, sound legal advice and leadership capable of thinking above the level of a failed City Barrow Boy!

No wonder the rats are deserting the sinking ship - leaving the rest squabbling and abusing their erstwhile associates - what a poisinous group they are!

By the bye any process of the Disciplinary Claims against West may well land EUkip in Court on the separate cause of attempting to intimidate a witness - I believe this can carry a custodial sentence - in fact I believe Brian Ferry is currently in Prison on remand for attempted witness intimidation.

Just consider what a farce a vote for this shower is! They can't run a party but they want votes to run a Country!!!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...