UKIP-vs-EUkip

UKIP-vs-EUkip
CLICK THE PIC for More on UKIP

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

#302* - EUkip IN COURT IN IPSWITCH


#302* - EUkip IN COURT IN IPSWITCH

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

EUkip IN COURT IN IPSWITCH - FACING THE CLEAR CLAIMS OF DISHONESTY DURING MEP SELECTION/ELECTION!

Hi,

Further to my earlier posting on this specific case CLICK HERE

It would apear that my summary projection was correct.

Having checked with Ipswich Court I have no reason to believe that my information is in any way inaccurate.

This morning Mr. John West & Mrs. Alison West presented to present their claim before District Judge Patrick Bazley White in the small claims Court.

Also present were Jonathan Arnott for EUkip and Peter Reeve who is currently under investigation for common assault by the British Police who have received various substantiating witness statements. It was brought to the attention of Reeve that he was under caution not to approach the Wests or their home, the Judge noted this but over ruled based on his Court being a public place.

A brief overview of the documentation, which included supportive correspondence and reports validating the fact that EUkip had cheated Mr. & Mrs. West out of their money in the same way as Linda Robson and many others. There is clearly no question of whether individuals were listed as candidates or not, it is a matter of unarguable dishonesty by EUkip as made VERY clear in the OFFICIAL report of their own Returning Officer.

The veracity of the report was confirmed. It was also noted that Linda Robson with an identical claim not only had her fee refunded but also interest and costs. A copy of Linda Robson's case presented to her Small Claims Court which was settled was present in the 'bundle' as presented to The District Judge.

The summary of District Judge Patrick Bazley White would seem to have been the unequivocal comment that the Wests would seem to have a sound case but it was beyond the remit of his Court (I presume since as a matter of fact the money had been obtained by EUkip under false pretences - as with the repayment of Robin Page's also!).

The Judge suggested the Wests should consider Judicial Review or some other means to seek redress and he further suggested that they seek legal advice as to how to proceed.

Although not legally trained (Trained in the law :-) for the semantic nit pickers!) it was fairly clear that the dishonesty of EUkip was beyond the remit of this Court and I like many others had hoped EUkip would act honourably and settle with the Wests as they have with others including Mrs. Robson and Mr. Page.

Neither Jonathan Arnott for EUkip nor Peter Reeve were called upon to make constructive comment - which was probably wise of the District Judge as he may well have deduced they were not capable of so doing.

This is not a good verdict for EUkip as it permits of The Wests, jointly or severally seeking Judicial Review against EUkip for its corruption as seemingly accepted by the Judge in his recomendation that they take the case forward.

I understand the Court/Judge will be providing a brief written summary shortly. (thought to be about a week to 10 days). This Court is NOT a Court of Record and the Judge took his own notes. Clearly the Judge failed to dismiss the case advising the Wests to a higher Court (able to deal with the matter of EUkip obtaining money by deception).

I was not in the Court but based upon the details at CLICK HERE my contacts with the Court and the verbal summary I have received I believe the above information to be an accurate and true representation of the Case to date. I have no reason to believe that The Courts or my informants would have any cause to mislead me.

Should anyone have any further factual information which they can substantiate please do not hesitate to contact me and I will include the facts in further articles.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...