#450* - Is Douglas DENNY DELUSIONAL? YOU DECIDE!
Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!
Is Douglas DENNY DELUSIONAL?
HERE ARE SOME FACTS FOR YOU
YOU DECIDE!!
Hi,
I was somewhat bemused by the apparent dishonesty of Douglas Denny in such a blatant manner. I appreciate he is far from reliable and has a proven track record of deliberate dishonesty but to be so blatant as in this exchange on Anthony Butcher of Libertas.EU's Forum was surprising.
I apprreciate that Anthony Butcher and certain of his corrupt moderators seem only too happy to provide a platform for liars like Bob FM, Douglas Denny, Mark Croucher, Paul Nuttall and others in the pay of or supporting the corruption of EUkip in order to suppress the truth.
In passing I am all too happy to make ANY correction to ensure my Blogs are accurate and my full contact details can be found if you CLICK HERE - anonimous posters will of course be ignored unless they are willing, in absolute confidence, to give their reason for anonimity to my satisfaction. Cowards who hide behind false identities in order to defame are beneath contempt and I rarely read or pay notice to such individuals.
I QUOTE form the material sent to me from The Forum:
Quote:
Originally Posted by junius
In conversation with GLW the other day I was quite amused when he read to me the details of an email sent by Dippy Denny.
You may recall that Denny complained to the Police after GLW published a rather embarrassing email exchange between Denny and Jonathan ‘nice but dim’ Arnott.
In Denny’s email he bitterly complained about Michael Zuckerman incompetence. He ended his rant by describing Zuckerman as a soggy sheep.
Denny has now spoken with PC Bishop of Chichester Police who has made it absolutely clear that, regardless of Denny’s fantasies, no crime has been committed and the Police will be taking no further action against GLW.
In high dudgeon the delusional Denny has sent a ranting email to Nuttall, Zuckerman and Arnott in which he compares himself to the Tory MP who had his office searched by the Police!
Ironically, he has now sent a pleading email to the very man who but a few short weeks ago was accused by Denny of legal incompetence. In this email he asks Zuckerman for legal advice!
Denny, your priceless!
Junius' Blog can be viewed if you CLICK HERE
Here is Douglas Denny's response!
douglas denny
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CHICHESTER
Posts: 1,806
Party: UKIP
This is nonsense.I assure you the investigation is still ongoing by West Sussex police.
There is prima facie evidence of criminal activity under the Misuse of Computers Act.
I also assure you there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth in the GLW/Junius axis.
DED.
Here is the text of Douglas Denny's 'e'Mail to which Junius has eluded in his first posting:
FYI.
Colleagues,
I have just had a conversation with a PC. Bishop and Sergeant Millburn of Chichester police regarding the one-to-one e-mail exchange between Jonathan Arnott and myself which was intercepted and published by GLW.
They refuse to investigate any further on the grounds that they have no evidence of a criminal act or unlawful interception of the e-mails.
It appears they contacted GLW and asked him about the publishing of the e-mails. He does not deny possession of them, but states he "received them from a third party who had them sent to them, by myself or Jonathan Arnott". He refuses to disclose his source.
The police say it is incumbent upon myself (or Jonathan) to ask the internet provider for details of isp's who have accessed the accounts at the relevant time, to find out if there is any unlawful accessing to prove unlawful hacking. I would have thought that was their job - but it is clear they don't want the paperwork or hassle involved. They can arrest an MP and go through his computers, paperwork and mobile phones in Westminster Palace, at the behest of a government minister (and against the law doing so) - but won't look into a case of obvious hacking and interception by a member of the public.
They say there is no evidence of criminal acts occurring in this case. Is this correct Michael? Surely the interception is self-evident, the question is - is it a criminal act?
And are they obliged ort not to investigate further?
I shall ask for the case details to be sent to me Michael so you can scrutinise the case and see if there is anything further needs to be done.
It is clear to me that the UKIP.org server is compromised. It also implies with the statement by GLW, that some person is deliberately accessing e-mails on the UKIP.og server and sending them to GLW. This needs investigating.
Douglas.
To help clarify for you here is the 'e'Mail Douglas Denny wrote so clearly 'slagging off' Ma Zucherman CLICK HERE
also you may find the following of interest in understanding the duplicity and lack of morality of Douglas Denny CLICK HERE or LINK
Perhaps my interjection of facts into Douglas Denny's risible 'e'Mail as published above will help:
FYI.
Colleagues,
Wow how very Politically Correct for The Communist chip on the shoulder Party! Or for that matter The odious EU!
I have just had a conversation with a PC. Bishop and Sergeant Millburn of Chichester police regarding the one-to-one e-mail exchange between Jonathan Arnott and myself which was intercepted and published by GLW.
Was it intercepted as you claim or hacked as you also claim? Or was it in fact sent to me direct - do make your mind up!
This is just delusional, does Denny think he is in one of his spy novels? One only has to see his endless maunderings about Enigma coding - not so much an encrytion method as a sleeping draft in the hands of Denny! Harry is very interesting on this subject and so are SOME of the others from Bexley whom I have met over the years but Denny just makes this fascinating period of history boring.
They refuse to investigate any further on the grounds that they have no evidence of a criminal act or unlawful interception of the e-mails.
How right they are - since when were the Police Denny's gofers and errand boys!
It appears they contacted GLW and asked him about the publishing of the e-mails.
Fortunately, although there are times when the Police make fools of themselves and overlook that as yet this is NOT a Police State they were well aware that since no reasonable grounds or evidence was provided that a crime had been committed and it was just fantasy from denny - frankly it is absolutely none of their business where I get my information from.
However we can expect Denny to invent all sorts of fantasies especially now that the duplicitous and underhand Mark Croucher is back on the payroll having trashed his two pubs commercially it seems. Probably once again seeking a new and duplicitous source of income.
He does not deny possession of them, but states he "received them from a third party who had them sent to them, by myself or Jonathan Arnott".
No I did not - I told them it was absolutely none of their busness where I received information or in what format and that it was however a crime under law to harass someone and that one more phone call would of course constitute harassmen.
He refuses to disclose his source.
Not only did I refuse I pointed out that I was fairly sure they had better things to do like go out and help the Met. smash some cameras and I had absolutely no ointention of supporting their Police State abuse of trust.
The police say it is incumbent upon myself (or Jonathan) to ask the internet provider for details of isp's who have accessed the accounts at the relevant time, to find out if there is any unlawful accessing to prove unlawful hacking.
Perhaps Denny should try the Nottingham Police who acted so dispicably in the case of Tony Elwood seemingly on a dishonest and uncorroborated anonimised so called tip off that would seem to have been through Derek Clark or a member of his staff.
I would have thought that was their job -
That Douglaas Denny would have thought atall may come as a shock to some who read his fantasies!
but it is clear they don't want the paperwork or hassle involved.
How fortunate for Denny as clearly they would be charging him with bearing false witness, making unsubstantiated speculative claims and wasting Police time.
They can arrest an MP and go through his computers, paperwork and mobile phones in Westminster Palace, at the behest of a government minister (and against the law doing so) -
It may come as a surprise to the posturing and dishonest little insignifican squirt that a Government minister does have some authority and some clout and holds an elected Office in The Government!
but won't look into a case of obvious hacking and interception by a member of the public.
Rather than perpetuate the dishonesty perhaps Denny could explain whether it is obvious hacking or obvious interception he is claiming - both being clearly wrong.
Douglas Denny - not only have you been proved a liar, a cheat, corrupt and now you seem intent on continuing to prove you are a fool.
I wonder if Denny is man enough to apologise for his dishonest speculations and attempts to libel and defame me - we shall see what his level of integrity is!
They say there is no evidence of criminal acts occurring in this case.
Clearly the Police are correct.
Is this correct Michael?
This is the same Michael that Denny claims to be legally incompetent - 'a soggy sheep' - far be it from me to disagree with Denny but why is he now grovelling?
Surely the interception is self-evident, the question is -
I believe it would help you in answering your own question if you checked out the meaning of 'Self Evident'. You will find the more intelligent readers are unlikely to agree with your libels.
is it a criminal act?
NO. The Police have told you Denny, if you are confused phone me up and I'll explain the limitations of your argument and how you would of course be right in a Police State. You are trying to impose EU style laws.
And are they obliged ort not to investigate further?
They told you dummy.
I shall ask for the case details to be sent to me Michael so you can scrutinise the case and see if there is anything further needs to be done.
I trust they make you pay for it and no doubt Ma Zucherman will find someone to bill for his opinion (Stupid as you believe him to be).
It is clear to me that the UKIP.org server is compromised.
OH - has this anything to do with the subject of my publishing your idiotic 'e'Mails?
Let me let you in on a secret that almost everyone knows - YES the server IS compromised hence Gollom and Titford were able to download confidential 'e'Mails as per Ken Bennetts complaint which ended up in the hands of The Police!
It also implies with the statement by GLW, that some person is deliberately accessing e-mails on the UKIP.og server and sending them to GLW.
How on earth do you jump to this conclusion?
This needs investigating.
Douglas.
Bit slow on the uptake aren't you Denny - It has been investigated and the Police have made it very clear that no crime has been committed. Yet again Denny is bringing EUkip into disrepute with his serial stupidity and gratuitous dishonesty and libels.
I look forward to your apology Denny - do by all means make it on Butcher's corrupt Forum. You might also ask your co-conspirator Bob FM if he is man enough to apologise for his lies too.
Is it any wonder that Denny uses as an Avateur a picture of a deeply flawed and hopelessly untable mental case in one of his most tragic roles acting the part of a complete idiot! You will recall the outcome of the sad little man's life!
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Posts
