Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!
NIALL WARRY REBUTTS THE CORRUPT EFFORTS OF EUkip TO COVER-UP THEIR BEHAVIOUR - JUST EUkip WITNESS TAMPERING?
Hi,
It is interesting that I have this time received a copy of Niall Warry's letter in rebuttal of the attempt to duplicitously silence him as a member before the NEC ended!
However as noted in response to the minutes that were kindly supplied to me last time so that members of EUkip were not kept in the dark as to what is or is not being done in their name - this shows just how concerned many of the NEC and leadership are about the fact that corruption in EUkip would seem to be endemic.
Never forget that many NEC & leadership clique computers are easily accessed by others!
I look forward to enlightening the members with more details from the NEC meeting today and more of the dishonest and corrupt cabal's efforts to promote their personal interests at the expense of the membership and the efforts of a few to expose the dishonesty and self seeking rigging of the NEC.
EUkip are clearly not worthy of any honest man or woman of integrity lending their vote to in its present befouled state with Farage having exploited corruption and dishonesty to seize the leadership, his little chum David Bannerman a serial failure from the Tories having lied and fraudulently misrepresented himself continually dragging EUkip's name into the gutter in which he seemingly resides. The endless serial dishonesty of EUkip's little henchmen and usefull idiots like Bob Feel-Martinis, Mick McGough who so willingly lies and demeans himself for preferment, the odious little liar Mark Croucher acting as Farage's succubus etc. etc. - clearly EUkip now has no one fit for office of any stature - liars, cheats, fools, clowns, drunks and their one performing monkey!
Here is the full text of Major Niall Warry's letter rebutting the behaviour of EUkip - as supplied to me from one of EUkip's senior members:
Higher Farm
Westcombe
Nr Shepton Mallet
SOMERSET
BA4 6ER
11th January 2009
Dear Mr Zuckerman,
I write to you in your capacity as Party Secretary, as I was advised to do, for you to set aside the arbitrary and perverse decision to reject my membership renewal.
I am advised the UKIP Constitution considers the issue of membership renewal in the following context.
1. Application for Membership is accepted only once, at the point of first application. The annual subscription is simply that, an annual payment; it is not an annual renewal of membership. Membership is ultimately lost if the sub is not paid but membership is not created by the sub as it already exists. Therefore the Party is not at liberty arbitrarily to refuse an annual sub as an underhand ruse to cancel membership.
2. The Constitution specifically sets up a mechanism for terminating membership via the disciplinary process. This clearly indicates that there is no other power to terminate membership. After all why set up a disciplinary system if there was a simple power for the NEC to expel members? In any case the Constitution does not give the NEC that power.
3. To expel a member or refuse membership renewal arbitrarily is an affront to natural justice. It deprives the member of the right to face his accusers, to hear the charges, to defend himself. Neither the NEC nor the leadership are authorised to bring UKIP into disrepute by flouting the rules for their own personal gain or protection at the cost of the democratic rights of the members.
4. Trying to prevent a membership renewal is in fact a devious attempt to bypass the rules and due process, and mocks the constitution. It is ultra vires.. That the NEC and leadership are willing to bring the party into disrepute by such duplicity would indicate that clearly many amongst them are unfit to hold such office. That you as a claimed Solicitor seem willing to collude in this corruption of the party rules does little to instil confidence in you or your professional body.
In addition to the above I respond to your 3 excuses you gave for seeking to set aside the rules and natural justice in trying to refuse to renew my membership as follows:-
1.You claim I openly criticise the party telling readers not to vote for EUkip. Firstly in the main I criticise the leadership NOT the party and I call UKIP EUkip to make readers aware how IMO UKIP MEPs have been shown to have gone native – an issue that is most easily shown and proven. Also I did openly consider whether abstaining would be a better course of action but I never told anyone not to vote for UKIP simply that they should think twice before voting for EUkip. Anyway expulsion on such petty grounds is clearly ridiculous and I don’t recall Francis Pym being expelled from the Tories for suggesting it would be better for the country if the Tory majority was reduced. Your grounds are childish and bring the party into disrepute as it shows the party to be undemocratic and clearly so massively insecure it is unwilling to discuss the future.
2.You have no proof I have collected any money for any fund, perhaps you would be so good as to substantiate your crass claim – in that nowhere has it been stated what any collection is to do other than support any legitimate attempt to ‘clean up’ UKIP. You will be minded that you have already refunded monies by way of compensation for the dishonesty of the drawing up of MEP candidates as shown unequivocally in your own Returning Officer’s Official Report which has been placed in the public domain. May I also remind you that in any event I was volunteered for such a position without my initial consent – consent which I gave when I was aware that an elected NEC member had accepted. If this issue was a problem I would have been happy to discuss it at any disciplinary hearing that may have been appropriate. You will be minded that Nikki Sinclair took UKIP to court and won her case and is still working for you! I understand that as a solicitor YOU represented Nikki – yet now you hold office despite proving UKIP to be legally wrong on that occasion!
3. I am pretty clear I NEVER informed Head Office that I would not be renewing my membership. However even if I had I trust there is no law against changing one’s mind – it is a fundamental right in a free Country to change one’s mind! However I believe I may well have mused on the Democracy Forum what my fate would be at the time of my renewal as I was openly being so critical of Nigel and his style and incompetence in leadership.
In Summary I claim the decision by the NEC to arbitrarily refuse to renew my membership is morally reprehensible, draconian, perverse and unconstitutional being against your own rules and clearly against any form of natural justice.
Rest assure I shall not be letting this matter drop and am seeking professional advice as to the best course of action I should take for the fact that your actions are defamatory to my character, your refusal to renew my membership defames me, and you illegitimately deny me the fundamental right to defend myself in any meaningful way.
Clearly the actions of yourself, your leader and your NEC bring UKIP into disrepute. As if this wasn’t bad enough the party has parachuted in unelected candidates for the Euro Elections and elevating the questionable Ms. Andreasen and David Bannerman – these matters are completely unacceptable in a Political Party in the run up to its elections. The results of such actions would seem to be all too clear with the collapse in membership and active support, the fractured nature of the party under such incompetent leadership and the absence of good publicity.
I look forward to your letter of apology for your unacceptable behaviour and the prompt supply of my membership card and rights. Your attempt to debase the Party rules and bring the party into disrepute with your illegitimate attempt to withhold my membership, which it is NOT within your right to withhold, is clearly invalid. It is of course this type of corruption of the party which I am campaigning against, to give UKIP a sound right and grounding to attack the unacceptable subsidiarity of OUR Country to the illegitimate orders of the EU.
I do not accept that Farage or/& Clark should have signed an agreement to GREATER subsidiarity of our Country to the EU, nor to working more closely with EU Committees to strengthen their controls over Britain.I look forward to actively and energetically campaigning for the election of a cleaned up UKIP and to that end demand my right to membership and my democratic right to campaign for UKIP to be cleaned up.
T.N.Warry.
Westcombe
Nr Shepton Mallet
SOMERSET
BA4 6ER
11th January 2009
Dear Mr Zuckerman,
I write to you in your capacity as Party Secretary, as I was advised to do, for you to set aside the arbitrary and perverse decision to reject my membership renewal.
I am advised the UKIP Constitution considers the issue of membership renewal in the following context.
1. Application for Membership is accepted only once, at the point of first application. The annual subscription is simply that, an annual payment; it is not an annual renewal of membership. Membership is ultimately lost if the sub is not paid but membership is not created by the sub as it already exists. Therefore the Party is not at liberty arbitrarily to refuse an annual sub as an underhand ruse to cancel membership.
2. The Constitution specifically sets up a mechanism for terminating membership via the disciplinary process. This clearly indicates that there is no other power to terminate membership. After all why set up a disciplinary system if there was a simple power for the NEC to expel members? In any case the Constitution does not give the NEC that power.
3. To expel a member or refuse membership renewal arbitrarily is an affront to natural justice. It deprives the member of the right to face his accusers, to hear the charges, to defend himself. Neither the NEC nor the leadership are authorised to bring UKIP into disrepute by flouting the rules for their own personal gain or protection at the cost of the democratic rights of the members.
4. Trying to prevent a membership renewal is in fact a devious attempt to bypass the rules and due process, and mocks the constitution. It is ultra vires.. That the NEC and leadership are willing to bring the party into disrepute by such duplicity would indicate that clearly many amongst them are unfit to hold such office. That you as a claimed Solicitor seem willing to collude in this corruption of the party rules does little to instil confidence in you or your professional body.
In addition to the above I respond to your 3 excuses you gave for seeking to set aside the rules and natural justice in trying to refuse to renew my membership as follows:-
1.You claim I openly criticise the party telling readers not to vote for EUkip. Firstly in the main I criticise the leadership NOT the party and I call UKIP EUkip to make readers aware how IMO UKIP MEPs have been shown to have gone native – an issue that is most easily shown and proven. Also I did openly consider whether abstaining would be a better course of action but I never told anyone not to vote for UKIP simply that they should think twice before voting for EUkip. Anyway expulsion on such petty grounds is clearly ridiculous and I don’t recall Francis Pym being expelled from the Tories for suggesting it would be better for the country if the Tory majority was reduced. Your grounds are childish and bring the party into disrepute as it shows the party to be undemocratic and clearly so massively insecure it is unwilling to discuss the future.
2.You have no proof I have collected any money for any fund, perhaps you would be so good as to substantiate your crass claim – in that nowhere has it been stated what any collection is to do other than support any legitimate attempt to ‘clean up’ UKIP. You will be minded that you have already refunded monies by way of compensation for the dishonesty of the drawing up of MEP candidates as shown unequivocally in your own Returning Officer’s Official Report which has been placed in the public domain. May I also remind you that in any event I was volunteered for such a position without my initial consent – consent which I gave when I was aware that an elected NEC member had accepted. If this issue was a problem I would have been happy to discuss it at any disciplinary hearing that may have been appropriate. You will be minded that Nikki Sinclair took UKIP to court and won her case and is still working for you! I understand that as a solicitor YOU represented Nikki – yet now you hold office despite proving UKIP to be legally wrong on that occasion!
3. I am pretty clear I NEVER informed Head Office that I would not be renewing my membership. However even if I had I trust there is no law against changing one’s mind – it is a fundamental right in a free Country to change one’s mind! However I believe I may well have mused on the Democracy Forum what my fate would be at the time of my renewal as I was openly being so critical of Nigel and his style and incompetence in leadership.
In Summary I claim the decision by the NEC to arbitrarily refuse to renew my membership is morally reprehensible, draconian, perverse and unconstitutional being against your own rules and clearly against any form of natural justice.
Rest assure I shall not be letting this matter drop and am seeking professional advice as to the best course of action I should take for the fact that your actions are defamatory to my character, your refusal to renew my membership defames me, and you illegitimately deny me the fundamental right to defend myself in any meaningful way.
Clearly the actions of yourself, your leader and your NEC bring UKIP into disrepute. As if this wasn’t bad enough the party has parachuted in unelected candidates for the Euro Elections and elevating the questionable Ms. Andreasen and David Bannerman – these matters are completely unacceptable in a Political Party in the run up to its elections. The results of such actions would seem to be all too clear with the collapse in membership and active support, the fractured nature of the party under such incompetent leadership and the absence of good publicity.
I look forward to your letter of apology for your unacceptable behaviour and the prompt supply of my membership card and rights. Your attempt to debase the Party rules and bring the party into disrepute with your illegitimate attempt to withhold my membership, which it is NOT within your right to withhold, is clearly invalid. It is of course this type of corruption of the party which I am campaigning against, to give UKIP a sound right and grounding to attack the unacceptable subsidiarity of OUR Country to the illegitimate orders of the EU.
I do not accept that Farage or/& Clark should have signed an agreement to GREATER subsidiarity of our Country to the EU, nor to working more closely with EU Committees to strengthen their controls over Britain.I look forward to actively and energetically campaigning for the election of a cleaned up UKIP and to that end demand my right to membership and my democratic right to campaign for UKIP to be cleaned up.
T.N.Warry.
It is astonishing that Ma Zucherman as partner, presumably with the waste bin in the corner of his office, at Bent & Manure so willingly brings his professional Trade Union into disrepute - I gather he has been having problems with his Union already and complaints have been lodged for his unprofessional behaviour with The Law Society.
I wonder how he is fairing with Marilyn Heywood and her family's claims of fraud?
I thought Rachel Oxley was doing the 'Legal Advice' these days for the clown council of EUkip! Whilst the idiot Ma Zucherman was dispensing medical opinions and protecting his chum The Desk in return for the possibility of preferment on the London list if they can engineer little Choclate Button out and back to being a BT shop assistant!
I wonder how he is fairing with Marilyn Heywood and her family's claims of fraud?
I thought Rachel Oxley was doing the 'Legal Advice' these days for the clown council of EUkip! Whilst the idiot Ma Zucherman was dispensing medical opinions and protecting his chum The Desk in return for the possibility of preferment on the London list if they can engineer little Choclate Button out and back to being a BT shop assistant!
Then there is the ridiculous BNP styled Farage placeman NuttAll who brings neither skills nor experience to the puppet placement as Farage's chair. He is so inept that he can't even run a meeting without calling the Police to restore order and is so ashamed of his behaviour that he has refused to attend a meeting in Ugley if John West might come - how very apposite that Peter Reeve, another BNP styled bully will be with him in Ugley - never has a place been so aptly named - Bannerman the creeeepie and the liar and cheat Mick McGough had better book their seats or their Ugley appearances will be out shone!
Douglas Denny who has been irrefutably proven dishonest and a liar and was suspended from Returning Officer status for his corruption of the Leadership election/scam we note is the nodding donkey for Farage in making the complaint about Niall Warry having the timerity to have a democratic opinion!
Denny is a nebish who just does as he is told and will do anything to hide the ordure that is EUkip's leadership.
Denny is a nebish who just does as he is told and will do anything to hide the ordure that is EUkip's leadership.
Well of course Clark backed the trumped up claim against Niall warry - a classic case of witness intimidation one may claim as Clark is under investigation by OLAF and amongst the claims there may well be the call by OLAF as a witness as Niall Warry was for some time on Clark's salaried staff whilst acting as Office Manager - you will recall that Andrew Smith engineered not to meet with Niall Warry on 3 occasions when he wished to get to the bottom of the accounting procedures which were seemingly amiss.
Niall warry was removed, we understand at Smith's behest - thus facilitating the continued obfuscation of the accounts and it was not until Richard Suchorzewski with a degree in banking and various accountancy and FIA qualifications put Smith under questioning when elected to the NEC that Smith left at some speed leaving the accounts in a most unprofessional and incompetent disaray!
Niall Warry was for much of the time that Derek Clark paid him never asked to do any work and yet salaried by the tax payer!
Yes indeed one can see why Clark has a vested interest, which would seem a classic case of Witness Intimidation.
Ma Zucherman - having claimed to be a solicitor of some sort can we count on the fact that as Party Secretary you acquitted your duty and ensured that those who should recused themselves!
In that EUkip is seeking to duplicitously remove members who wish to improve the party and restore it as a force to rekon with - the Great White Charger to lead us to the uplands of liberty and probity, decency and morality as so many of us saw it, our own White Knight. Once the scum that has risen to the top in EUkip started to use and abuse the rules and their authority it becomes clear why liars and cheats like Andrew Smith, Mick McGough, Mark Croucher, Douglas Denny, Annabelle Fouller and others of their callibre have not had their membership withdrawn after having dragged the party into disrepute and a full legitimate Disciplinary Hearing - you will note that despite the irrefutable fact that Tom Wise brought EUkip into disrepute in the media and has even been arrested and Derek Clark tried to engineer a Kangaroo Court against Peter Baker and is under investigation having also betrayed EUkip and our Country espousing Britain have GREATER subsidiarity to the EU.
Then of course the serial phillandery and bad publicity gained by the party performing monkey that has done such harm and the FACT that Titford & Gulleyslime have both been investigated by the Police and Titford is under investigation by OLAF etc. etc. None of these individuals have had their membership challenged yet the untrustworthy self enrichers and self seekers of the NEC & Leadership attack those who have the Party's best interests at heart such as Gregg Beaman, Niall warry, Petrina Holdsworth, John West, Dr. Eric Edmond, Martin Haslam; Dr. David Abbott, Richard Suchorzewski, Heather Connyngham, Dr. Richard North none of whome has so much as a blemish on their character - One starts to realise just how corrupt EUkip has become funded by the ex bookie Alan Bown and seemingly for the gain of a few direputable low lifes.
Niall warry was removed, we understand at Smith's behest - thus facilitating the continued obfuscation of the accounts and it was not until Richard Suchorzewski with a degree in banking and various accountancy and FIA qualifications put Smith under questioning when elected to the NEC that Smith left at some speed leaving the accounts in a most unprofessional and incompetent disaray!
Niall Warry was for much of the time that Derek Clark paid him never asked to do any work and yet salaried by the tax payer!
Yes indeed one can see why Clark has a vested interest, which would seem a classic case of Witness Intimidation.
Ma Zucherman - having claimed to be a solicitor of some sort can we count on the fact that as Party Secretary you acquitted your duty and ensured that those who should recused themselves!
In that EUkip is seeking to duplicitously remove members who wish to improve the party and restore it as a force to rekon with - the Great White Charger to lead us to the uplands of liberty and probity, decency and morality as so many of us saw it, our own White Knight. Once the scum that has risen to the top in EUkip started to use and abuse the rules and their authority it becomes clear why liars and cheats like Andrew Smith, Mick McGough, Mark Croucher, Douglas Denny, Annabelle Fouller and others of their callibre have not had their membership withdrawn after having dragged the party into disrepute and a full legitimate Disciplinary Hearing - you will note that despite the irrefutable fact that Tom Wise brought EUkip into disrepute in the media and has even been arrested and Derek Clark tried to engineer a Kangaroo Court against Peter Baker and is under investigation having also betrayed EUkip and our Country espousing Britain have GREATER subsidiarity to the EU.
Then of course the serial phillandery and bad publicity gained by the party performing monkey that has done such harm and the FACT that Titford & Gulleyslime have both been investigated by the Police and Titford is under investigation by OLAF etc. etc. None of these individuals have had their membership challenged yet the untrustworthy self enrichers and self seekers of the NEC & Leadership attack those who have the Party's best interests at heart such as Gregg Beaman, Niall warry, Petrina Holdsworth, John West, Dr. Eric Edmond, Martin Haslam; Dr. David Abbott, Richard Suchorzewski, Heather Connyngham, Dr. Richard North none of whome has so much as a blemish on their character - One starts to realise just how corrupt EUkip has become funded by the ex bookie Alan Bown and seemingly for the gain of a few direputable low lifes.
TO LEAVE THE EU
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve
NOTHING.Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:
ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve
NOTHING.Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:
ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Posts
