#925* - The LIES of STUART PARR & SYSTEMIC DISHONESTY OF EUkip.

#925* - The LIES of STUART PARR & SYSTEMIC DISHONESTY OF EUkip.

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

The LIES of STUART PARR & SYSTEMIC DISHONESTY OF EUkip & THEIR ABJECT FAILURES UNDER THE DPA.!

Hi,

Minden of the pernicious dishonesty of Stuart Parr on the Officially promoted Bloggers4Ukip and having noted the unpleasant twaddle he has published in attack mode against Nikkie Sinclaire amongst his endless misrepresentations and lies is his ill informed opinion with regard to The Data Protection Act - this may well be due to the deliberate leaking of material by another agent of EUkip who had located some material considered sensitive which he decided to react and circulate - some indication of just how hubristic EUkip are when it comes to their legal duties.

little Stuart also seems to know nothing of copyright law and less about libel gratuitously libelling me with his lies and others without being able to substantiate his lies yet bleating when facts are wrotten about him!

Here are the two pages as redacted:

& here is Page 2:

However of far more interest was what was Mark Croucher seeking to airbrush out.

Here is the unredacted document published now to show Stuart Parr for the dishonest and unpleasant fool he most certainly is.
Here is the full text of the private letter to EUkip's chairman which Croucher accessed and published:

Mr Paul Nuttall –

Party Chairman

UK Independence Party

Head Office

PO Box 408, Newton Abbot

TQ12 9BG

7th April 2009

Case Reference Number RFA0208845

Dear Mr Nuttall

Thank you for your letter dated 22 February 2009 and the attached report from your colleague Mr David Challice. Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your letter.

You have stated that it is not the practice of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) to place personal data onto laptop computers. However, Mr Challice’s letter states that “staff at Head Office rarely use laptops”, indicating that laptop computers may sometimes be used. Mr Challice also states that personal information may be placed on a “removable data stick” for the use on a laptop during the annual party conference. For the purposes of principle 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the Act), we do not draw a distinction between data sticks and laptop computers. It is the view of the Information Commissioner’s Officer (ICO) that any portable device or electronic media used to store and/or transmit personal data must be encrypted in order to be considered compliant with principle 7. We do not consider password protection alone to offer an adequate level of protection.

In any event, we have been informed that on this occasion, a laptop computer was used. This laptop, containing Mr John West’s video interview, was not encrypted at the time that it was lost by Miss Annabelle Fuller, who was a member of staff at UKIP at the time of the incident. It therefore appears unlikely that UKIP has complied with the Act when processing Mr West’s personal data.

As we do not have sufficient evidence to support either UKIP’s or Mr West’s version of events in this case, we will not be taking any further action against UKIP or Miss Fuller at this time, and I will therefore be closing this case. However, it is of concern that Mr West’s personal data, for which UKIP was the data controller responsible, has been allowed to be disclosed in such a

manner. In particular, we must take into consideration the fact that this video related to Mr West’s political opinions (defined as “sensitive personal data” under section 2 of the Act) and that its release is likely to have caused him a considerable amount of distress. We are also concerned at the apparent lack of remedial action taken by UKIP to prevent against such an incident occurring in the future, and the apparent lack of a clear policy that covers the use of portable devices to process personal data, despite the fact that it appears such processing does occur (albeit somewhat infrequently).

I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate that any portable device or electronic media (including laptop computers) used to store and/or transmit personal data must be encrypted in order to be considered compliant with the Act. UKIP should therefore ensure that any such devices it does use are encrypted and that its mobile computing and data security policies reflect this. UKIP must also ensure that its staff receive adequate training to comply with these policies.

While we will not be taking further action at this time, we will be retaining this case on file and taking it into account should we receive any further complaints of a similar nature. Please be aware that any further incidents involving the loss of an unencrypted device containing personal data are likely to result in formal enforcement action.

Yours sincerely

Rick Syers – Enforcement Officer

Regulatory Action Division

That Croucher accessed these at a time when he claimed not to be working for EUkip shows the cavalier attitude to data that EUkip has, and its clearly unfit for purpose attitudes.

At around this time Croucher also accessed EUkip computers and seemingly deliberately leaked information in an effort to 'frame' Piers Merchant who was dieing at the time and thus made no effort to defend himself against the unpleasant behaviour of EUkip and Croucher in particular.

Also at around the same time both David Bannerman and Nuttall claimed to have approached the Metropolitan police political unit where they made something of fools of themselves as there is no such unit! 

Then we had the idiotic Douglas Denny wasting Police time with his fantasies considering his maunderings and malevolent comments about his fellow NEC members behind their backs was of ANY interest to ANYONE let alone MI5 - his comments do nothing but damage to the reputation of EUkip with his fanciful conspiracy theories and libelous smears.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples - they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.


Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.

Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Leave-the-EU

to

Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate

LEAVE THE EU
to Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

#234* - MUPPETS, PUPPETS & THE CHALLICE RUNETH OVER

#234* - MUPPETS, PUPPETS & THE CHALLICE RUNETH OVER

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

MUPPETS, PUPPETS & THE CHALLICE RUNETH OVER - LIES, DAMNED LIES & EUkip


Hi,

here is an interesting letter which would seem to show the NEC & leadership for the cowardly underhand people they are and this is an EU funded staff member paid, I am given to understand, out of the creep Derek Clark's tax funded allowance.

This may be dud info. but it is just the sort of information that has him under investigation by OLAF, decrepid and looking ill he may be but that makes the dishonest and clearly corrupt Derek Clark no less unpleasant to deal with. It was Deadweight Derek who brought EUkip into such disrepute by betraying Britain in the most cowardly and sordid manner - yet it is this same dishonest little worm of a man who has been entrusted to manipulate EUkip's Constitution to remove yet more of the rights and protections of the membership.



We have seen some of the new Fascist style authoritarian corruptions that are being enacted already.

You will have noticed how the blagger Paul NuttAll - a man without ability experience or charm, has been allowed to strut around as Il Duce with his little shaven head to Farage's draconian and duplicitous Hitler style of betrayal of EUkip members and our Country.



Sad figures really, willing to stoop to any gutter for gain -
Look how these revolting people have treated:

ABBOTT, Dr. David
BAKER, Peter
BAUGH, Alan

BAYNES, Len

BEAMAN, Gregg

BOWLES, John

BOXALL, Lawrie

COLE, Peter

COLLIER, Geoffrey
COLMAN, Trevor

CONNYNGHAM, Helen
CHANT, Jill

EDMOND, Dr. Eric

ELLIS, Diane

ELLIS, Anne

GILMAN, Ian
GUEST, Linda

HARVEY, Michael
HASLAM, Martin

HOLDSWORTH, Petrina
HUDSON, Chris
LANCE-WATKINS, Greg

McCONNACHIE, Alistaire
McWHIRTER, Rob
MERCHANT, Piers
MUIR, Simon
NORTH, Dr. Richard
NOAKES, David

PAGE, Robin

PARSONS, Andy

PETLEY, John
ROEKE, John de

ROGERS, Peter

SCHOFIELD, Tony

STEAD, Marcus
STRINGFELLOW, Margaret

SUCHORZEWSKI, Richard

TROY, Peter

WARRY, Niall

WATSON, Peter

WEST, Alison

WEST, George
WEST, John

YOUNG, Delroy

I've added a few that I was reminded of since I first published the list the day before yesterday (16-Jan-09)! I can not think of one person on this list who would not have more skill and more to give to EUkip as NEC members than ANY two current members (a minimum)

We are given to understand that EUkip Yoof have risen to the huge number of 70 members (to quote NEC member Douglas Denny whose dishonesty and corruption has done EUkip such harm). 70 members having built WHAT on the foundations built by Del Young before Farage and his cronies did a knife job on him.

Interestingly Farage's grubby little hatchet man who, much like the risible NuttAll, was Wayne Harlin, all too willing to gain from the opportunity of corruption offered him (a child with the support of one adult will take on the world!). Once he had done his knife job for Farage he failed totally to build on the good efforts of Del Young - the web site he inheritted he and his new best friends failed to update EUkip Yoof's web site for well over a year, despite the fact that potentially it was far far better than EUkip's main web site which was off the shelf junk, because the so called leadership are not only incompetent but do not begin to understand the value of the internet!

Not surprisingly this unprincipled little puppet of Farage, when he saw a personal opportunity 'standing for the NEC' he removed the site to avoid evidence of blame! Sadly he is seemingly just another parasite who sees EUkip as a vehicle for gain. 70 members really is an embarrassment but what would one expect with the leadership of such an example as Lisa up the Duff who doesn't even turn up to NEC meetings we note! Most kids at college these days have 500 friends on FaceBook!

In the main honest, decent, intelligent folk who worked hard for the party and many gave generously - can you name any 5 members on the NEC or amongst their incubuses you would want working in a position of trust for you and as the NEC & leadership now are is there truelly anyone on it you would wish or trust as a friend?

Then why would you vote for them?

Note in some detail how these sordid little people fight like rats in a corner to keep their snouts in their corner of the trough be it Nigel Farage, Paul NuttAll, Marta Andreasen, David Bannerman, Linda Duffy, Ma Zucherman, Douglas Denny and their odious supporters like Andrew Smith, Stuart Agnew, Mark Croucher, Annabelle Fuller, Christopher Gill, Peter Reeve, Michael McGough, Rachel Oxley, and the rest of the pond life that has so damaged EUkip and betrayed the EUroSceptic movement. They are without exception without competence, charisma or integrity - they are beneath contempt and have dragged EUkip's name in the gutter.



Subject: NEC nominations FAO David Challice

Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:23:48 +0000

Dear Mr Challice, In your letter dated 17th December you provided ‘evidence’ in the form of a photocopied envelope to substantiate your allegation that I had missed the closing date for NEC nominations.



You stated that my nomination papers were in this envelope. You also said the envelope was still sealed. The Post Office has now confirmed to me that the envelope in question was posted in Liverpool on 12/12/8. Are you suggesting that I travelled all the way to Liverpool to post a letter? (Don't forget Paul Nuttall is a Liverpool Scally and he is the real signator of the original self serving drivel from the sad little gofer Challice - A salaried nobody [comment G.L-W.])



My nomination papers were in fact posted in Wickham Market on the morning of the 10th December. It was sent first class and was recorded. I have a receipt to prove this.



Would you care to explain how my nomination papers ended up in an envelope posted at the other end of the country?



In your telephone conversation you claimed that the Post Office may have done this but failed to provide an explanation as to why they would wish to do so.



You then claimed that my nomination papers had got lost in the post.



In the space of a few minutes you had apparently forgotten that in your original letter to me you had confirmed receipt of them!



When I asked you to check all the envelopes for a Suffolk postmark you stated that they had just been destroyed.



You then became quite agitated and shouted that the question of the envelope was ‘irrelevant’ as Paul Nuttall had ‘banned’ me from standing as an NEC candidate. You then slammed down the phone.



If I have been banned, as you claim, why was it felt necessary to put my papers in someone else’s envelope and produce this as evidence to explain why I could not stand for the NEC?



Do you not understand why I feel so aggrieved, especially after the way I was treated over the video?



Why does the party attack its own members in this way?



Why can't we be treated honestly?



Yours sincerely,

John West



John West should not be concerned at this as it shows how very frightened of the truth EUkip has become - In his honesty and simple integrity John West would seem to have rather missed the point!

Had it occurred to others why they are hounding John West?

These are classic witness intimidation techniquest and I wonder if the Police & Judge will be as hard nosed as in The Otis Ferry Case where he is serving his remand period in Jail, which may be as long as a year - not for his various offences as charged but for having tried to intimidate the witnesses. This is an identical case!

Do bear in mind that John West is the principle witness in a criminal case against EUkip and members of its staff being brought by The Data Protection Commissioner and Police - YES the case is dragging on rather and as yet not even the principles have been interviewed Annabelle Fuller (who came out with that pack of lies about Taxi driver's mates), nor Christopher Gill whose weak and dishonest behaviour has made it clear why he was almost universally despised by The Tories and never got anywhere despite his Farther's money - a sad and stupid figure and that was when he was at school!

Then do be minded that John West is likely to be called as the principle witness in a couple of cases being drawn up by The Information Commission's Office - again these will prove very damaging to EUkip.

Also do remember that John West will probably be called in the OLAF enquiry into Titford and when it is passed back to The British Police such cases as they decide to bring against Titford and Gulleyford.

Then of course he is the complainant in a case of Common Assault against Peter Reeve in his official capacity which was witnessed for the Police etc.

One need only look at the collection of clowns Britain has as a Government and the failed opposition to realise that the backlog in Police investigations is at record level and the DPA for instance when I was chatting with them recently, admit it is running 6 months behind hand!

Of course I have overlooked one of the main reasons that they are seeking to intimidate this particular witness - could it not be, as the NEC Minutes state, that they really have no defence in Court against his claims for refund of his deposits on the grounds of corruption and dishonestly as shown by the Returning Officer's Report.

To Quote Emile Zola - 'J'Accuse' - I believe there is every reason to believe in their arrogance and hubris EUkip's leadership is indulging in plain old bullying but more worryingly I believe they are doing it as a systematic part of WITNESS INTIMIDATION working hand in glove to silence those who like John West, Dr. David Abbott, Dr. Eric Edmond, Richard Suchorzewski, Petrina Holdsworth and others before them who have queried the accounts.

One is forced to wonder whether together with the huge amount of money that would seem to have been trousered by EUkip through obfuscated accounts whether EUkip is outright money laundering - the more questions that go unanswered the more questions that surface and it might account for the reason why the upper echelons of EUkip are over inhabitted by dullards and fools.

Is this the very reason why these odious people are so willing to try to besmirch and befoul the reputations of others? A desparate attempt to protect themselves and their criminality by distraction and intimidation! No wonder they surround themselves with filth and liars! AND of course a plethora of fools paid from the public purse.

Have they really gone that 'Native' and howmany are in on the scams? We note Farage NEVER fired Tom Wise and every effort was made to protect him - commencing with the outburst and bullying of Petrina Holdsworth by Mick Natrass and his witnessed temper tantrum when he said 'don't be f****** stupid we can't do anything to him he knows we are all at it - how do you think we get our money'. Then Trevor Colman's report was suppressed with which he acquiesced, all be it grudgingly but acquiesced none the less thus colluding in the criminality.

We note that although John Petley went to the police to report data tampering and the FACT that EUkip seniour personell were hacking into computers the only defence they have had was to claim whenever able that John Petley was fired for tampering with computers - A LIE. I make this statement with some certainty, not because I know and trust John Petley but because I know most of EUkip's leadership and have every reason and proof which shows that they are untrustworthy, liars, cheats and bullies.

TO LEAVE THE EU

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.

Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU's CAP - In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS - GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

#97* - The Caterpillars Seem To Be Losing!!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership & NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable

#97* - The Caterpillars Seem To Be Losing!!

Hi,

Subsequent to a series of eMails I published recently which passed by a conclusive majority votes of no confidence in the so called Regional Committee in the Eastern Region and also NO CONFIDENCE in Peter Reeve the Regional Organiser who it seems is seen as dishonest, self interested, corrupt and incompetent.

Now I have been sent a further series of eMails from the EU – fortunately there are deeply planted leaks in EUkip who despite their positions are prepared to put their elected positions and salaried jobs at risk in supplying me with facts to clean up EUkip to make it a party people of integrity could possibly vote for on a Patriotic basis.

Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:39:09 +0100
From:
To: reeve@ukip.org
Subject: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: FW: South West Branch]]

Pete,
thanks for letting us know,but as you can read in Marta's email we need to know a date of when that meeting will take place,can you find out and let me know.
Many thanks
Andrew

-------Original Message-------

From: PETER REEVE
Date: 10/17/08 09:22:55
To: peter cole(home)
Subject: FW: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: FW: South West Branch]]

Hi Peter Cole Thanks for your email, please could you let me know when your meeting to select a new chairman is going to be?

Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties

Peter Cole wrote:

Mr Reeve

Rest assured, the moment you start to answer my e-mails to you I will answer yours!

Peter Cole


From: UK Independence Party [mailto:ukipho@btconnect.com]
Sent: 21 October 2008 10:53
To: Peter ColeSubject:
Re: FW: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: FW: South West Branch]]

Peter,
Good morning. With regards to your branch,the reason Head Office needs a name of the chairman for this branch is that the Party Treasurer needs to make a return to the Electoral Commission detailing all branches with are currently active. I am informed that you are due to hold a meeting presently to vote for one.But, as to not close the branch or to fall foul of not having a treasurer and chairman of an active branch, can I suggest you put your name forward to act as interim chairman until such time as one is elected.RegardsAndrew
From: Peter Cole [mailto:peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk] Sent: 27 October 2008 11:43To: 'UK Independence Party'Cc: Subject: RE: FW: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: FW: South West Branch]]
Good morning Andrew

A meeting of UKIP South West Bedfordshire Branch was held yesterday, Sunday 26th October 2008 where Mr Tom Wise MEP stood down as Chairman and elected in his place by the paid up members, I, Peter Cole was elected as Chairman of the Branch, Mrs Janet Wise remains as Treasurer and Mr John Saunders as Secretary.

Would you kindly send me an up-to-list list of S.W.Branch members please and also a list of member in the Branch whose membership has expired during the last 12 months.

Two Motions were also passed at the meeting (more than 21 days notice to all paid up Branch Members was given as per Party rules):
Motion 1, a vote of NO CONFIDENCE IN THE EASTERN COUNTIES REGIONAL ORGANISER this was unanimously carried.

Motion 2, a vote of NO CONFIDENCE IN THE EASTERN COUNTIES COMMITTEE was also unanimously carried.

Regards
Peter
Peter Cole
UKIP Branch Chairman, South West Bedfordshire Branch.

From: FARAGE Nigel [mailto:nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu]
Sent: 27 October 2008 12:14
To: Peter Cole
Subject: RE: FW: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: FW: South West Branch]]

Dear Peter

Congratulations on your election, as Chairman of SW Beds., which does indeed entitle you to receive regularly up-dated membership-lists (including recently-expired memberships) for your area.

However, such lists are kept by Head Office, at Newton Abbot, in Devon - not here in Brussels - and should be sent out to you, from there, on receipt of the Secretary's official notification, to David Challice (Head Office Coördinator) of a change in the Branch's officers.

I am sorry to hear of these votes-of-no-confidence, which I hope, neverthless, will lead to a settlement acceptable to all right-thinking members.

Yours sincerely

Andrew S. Reed

(Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels)


Dear Andrew,

Thanks for your e-mail and kind words, the letter I sent out was in fact written to HQ and copied to Nigel and indeed the NEC.

I too am very sorry that members are so upset firstly with Peter Reeve and his lies and his lack of interest in our Branch and now secondly the chairman of the Eastern Counties Committee who has also decided to lie and not answer e-mails, it is a very sorry state.

As you know the ‘Newmarket Declaration’ has still not been answered.

All members should be listened to by the leaders, the work to get people elected comes from the foot soldiers out there, without them UKIP is a lost cause. I can see if the problems in the Eastern Counties are not solved soon there will be a major split, this will certainly do UKIP tremendous harm and I personally want Great Britain OUT of the EU, I gave up my business to fight for this cause but it appears because of written and spoken lies I am on a losing battle and many members agree with this statement.

I send you my best wishes

Peter
Peter Cole

Interestingly I have also received some of the paper work which it seems some of the dishonest members of EUkip’s leadership aim to use to secure their positions with snouts in the troughs at the expense of democracy, credibility and integrity within the party.

You may be interested to note that a part of the scam EUkip’s leadership seek to perpetrate on the membership is to issue VERY dubious attempts to bring about Disciplinary Cases based on various trumped up nonsense – this will suffice for their corrupt purposes as it will debar all but those they wish to put forward for positions on the NEC.

Do not forget that those who wish to stand for the NEC, which will almost definitely be rigged as with previous so called ‘votes’ held within EUkip, The first step is to block certain individuals by placing them before disciplinary complaints – however trumped up and however risible.

Consider for a starter who is making the complaints and you will almost deffinitly have identified a liar or at best one of the leadership toadies.

I believe that a majority of the leadership including the NEC are so fundamentally corrupt, incompetent and dishonest that they are unworthy of votes – whether in the ilk of the fraud, liar, cheat and failure David The Desk Bannerman who is also an EU employee a sad little man beneath contempt.

Or alternatively the proven liar, cheat and corrupt Douglas Denny who is clearly unfit and has repeatedly brought EUkip into disrepute in public an obscene foul mouthed little man unfit to speak for anyone let alone the decent members of what was UKIP.

Then we have Ms. Duffy whose election was not only implausible in terms of result but was founded on dishonesty and corruption – a woman unfit not only for office as a cheat but also unfit as an example for EUkip Yooof.

Then we have the fundamentally ridiculous junior school teacher – you will have seen some of her ridiculous actions and idiotic opinions on legal matters that make a mockery of the party and unarguably bring it into disrepute.

Consider the tired and spent Christopher Gill who has so clearly brought EUkip into disrepute with his abrogation of duty both in terms of overseeing the corrupt rigging of the selection scam for MEP candidates.

Also do be aware of how disgracefully this poor old man has let EUkip down.I do not believe that based upon the FACTS and considering the majority including those who support these people It is REASONABLE to describe EUkip’s self seeking venal leadership and NEC as not only clearly and provably corrupt but little more than a bunch of spivs, barrow boys and petty crooks.EUkip is finished unless it is cleaned-up and cleaned up FAST – even then it may well not survive.

I have literally DOZENS more letters and around 100 pages of documentary provenance to back my contention.I CHALLENGE the leadership of EUkip to a debate to defend themselves – they are by a majority beneath contempt.

Just to round up you will no doubt be disgusted to know that the unarguably dishonest, incompetent, corrupt and unprofessional Andrew Smith would seem to be working in cahoots with the cowardly and dishonest George Curtis, who so bravely lies about people when he believes his lies will not be exposed – George Curtis is clearly a liar and when I challenged him regarding some lies he had invented about me and published - he spluttered and mumbled but lacked the moral fibre to withdraw his lies and lacked the integrity to apologise – a sordid little man!

It seems he makes a habit of telling lies as proven by his response regarding the lies he published about Robin Page and also I understand John West.

Do note however that the self selected, in that there was NEVER a valid vote, the self proclaimed bunch of rascals on the so called Eastern Region Committee – which you will note has received Votes of no confidence from Bedford Branch, Fenland Branch and also some 21 separate branches under the Newmarket Declaraqtion – they are now so out of touch with the party but so determined to keep their snouts in EUkip’s troughs that I understand George Curtis will be cock a hoop as Andrew Smith wants the committee to act in its own interests NOT those of the membership by having members sign a gagging order that they will not let the people they represent know what fiddles they are upto, I understand that John Saunders was not enamoured of such a gagging order in fact I gather he positively up chucked and I understand has now been widely quoted by the BNP.

This is shamefull and makes EUkip look little better than the early days of Adolph Hitler – soon no doubt they will have their own brown shirts – shaven headed chavs as enforcers!It does seem the main function of EUkip is as a recruiting sergeant for the BNP – what an obscene realisation!No individual of ANY integrity or intelligence is likely to put his name or his money to support this crooked bunch of losers – who clearly have managed the demise of a dream sinking it in squabbling, lies, greed, distrust and corruption – no wonder their only backer of note made his money as a professional gambler – it is also worthy of note that it would seem EUkip has been unable to find a reputable British Firm of Reputable Accountants to present their books and have had to seek out a pro EU Danish woman living in Spain and it will be noted she had to be bribed at a cost of £36,000 PLUS expenses to sign the cheques on a part time basis – yet happily signed of the accounts at the business meeting when it was not just apparent but blatantly clear she had ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE OR UNDERSTANDING of important areas of the accounts – no wonder no one of repute has stepped forward to fund the party and it has failed to recruit a single solitary politician of credible stature – just one failed Tory MP looking for a way to keep his snout in the trough!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:LEAVE THE EU

#159* - A Measure Of How EUkip Would RULE?

#159* - A Measure Of How EUkip Would RULE?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

IN A FURTHER DISHONEST & SHAMEFULL EFFORT TO DESTROY UKIP:

Hi,

One can not possibly attribute ever act that brings EUkip into disrepute to incompetence - this shower of scheisters are staggeringly trying to enrich themselves by keeping their snouts in the trough in the EU.

It is morally reprehensible that these odious people are permitted to try to con the public into voting for them, without having to provide a warning showing that they have had 50 man years as MEPs and cost the tax payer £65,000,000 and have achieved absolutely nothing to fulfil their electoral promises NOT EVEN honour their promise to each other - paying their wives without even telling each other!

Let us look at the situation.

Last Night Suffolk Coastal Branch held a legitimate AGM, details can be seen at: #158* - SUFFOLK COASTAL & Alison & John WEST

You will notice the difficulties and dishonesties AND the support they received.

John West acquitted his duties and contacted EUkip Head Office Membership Secretary:

John West wrote:

Dear Nikki,

At Suffolk Coastal's AGM the following people were elected:

Alison West as Chairman.

John West as Secretary and Treasurer.

Contact details:
5 Spring Lane, Wickham Market, Woodbridge, Suffolk IP13 0SW.

Tel: 01728 746427

Emails: johnwest81@hotmail.com & alisonwest63@hotmail.com

The meeting was held in accordance with party rules and all Suffolk Coastal members were given 21 days notice of said meeting.

Yours sincerely,

John West

This eMail was clearly received:

UK Independence Party wrote:
John,thanks for letting us know,we will update the records.

Thanks

Andrew

However Alison & John West received this ill considered eMail from the clerical department!!

Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008

From: ukipho@btconnect.com

To: johnwest81@hotmail.com; vote.jonathan@googlemail.com; ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk; reeve@ukip.org

Subject: Re: FOA Nikki Edwards: Suffolk Coastal AGM

Dear John and Alison

With reference to the Suffolk Coastal Branch, I am afraid that after carrying out our usual procedural checks Head Office understands that the Branch meeting held to appoint a new committee was not properly constituted.

Until I receive clear guidance on this from the Party Chairman, General Secretary, or Eastern Regional Organiser, I regret that I am unable to make the changes you have requested. This is in your own interests as I'm sure you would not wish to receive UKIP members' details without being legally entitled to them.As you can see, I have copied this email to the three Party officers in question and will await further instructions.

Yours sincerely

David Challice

Head Office

Administration Manager

Let us consider who is going to carry out this undemocratic travesty - trying to force out of office the duely elected Officers of Suffolk Coastal Branch. Be minded EUkip has a due process and this corrupt kangaroo court is it seems setting aside the hard won democratic principles and the Disciplinary Committee.

So that is Disciplinary Committees set aside.

An attempted set aside of the fundamental human right of Freedom Of Speech - a core value of civilised politics.

It would seem the unelected puppet of Farage Little Jonathan Arnott has been appointed.
Well actually that is morally not acceptale as he has been appointed to disemble to see if he can dupe the Courts to find against both John West and separately Alison West.
In a denial of fundamental justice.

I have been sent a copy of the lies of Titford that are to be used to bear false witness.

Then we have this low quality BNP look alike the unelected employee who has presided over a catastrophic collapse of members in the Eastern Region, which from my lists would seem to show a fall of around 1 member per working day over and above any recruits!

This chappie is unfit to take part in this case as it was he who held a dishonest and corrupt ambush and kangaroo court.

Yet another BNP look alike!
This astonishingly is EUkip's part chairman, well I suppose not so very surprising Paul Nuttall is the unelected puppet of Farage and is so inadequate to the task that the Metropolitan Police had to attend to restore order at the only meeting he has chaired as yet!

Clearly this hopeless little chap can take no part as he has already been involved in trying to dishonestly and corruptly engineer the removal of John West.

Then we note just how low EUkip has sunk as they bring the entire party into disrepute by using the odious and proven liar Michael McGough to attack UKIP supporters to aid the survival of EUkip - It clearly takes liars and the dishonest to uphold the behaviour of EUkip.

Perhaps I could ask you to read the postings of EUkip's chosen bully boy at http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues

That EUkip have seen fit to firstly atempt to suppress Freedom of Speech on this forum recently, with little NuttAll issuing a vexatious and dishonest pack of lies founded on lies and without legitimacy see: #141* - EUkip's NuttAll Issues Party Suicide Note!...

Here is the dishonest document supplied to their errand boy Michael McGough and despite his reputation as a liar and a cheat he is used as EUkip's messenger.

It was on seeing this pack of lies placed deliberately on a public forum in a case that is ostensibly sub judice that having received a copy of the Head Office letter from another source I contacted Mr. West and asked for his permission to publish the material.

I admit I pointed out that I had the letter in my possesion and was merely acting as a courtesy in asking if he minded its publication.

"How can this supposed AGM be real as John West was informed that he was no longer a member of the Suffolk Coastal Constituency Assoc weeks ago, he and his wife do not even live in the constituency!
Sir - this is a lie, no constituted meeting has had been held nor any official letter on the matter has been delivered to either Alison West or John West.

That the past chairman is so ignorant of procedure that he does not appreciate the manner in which an AGM is called speaks volumes and that it is the duty of the secretary, John West to have called said meeting. May I remind whichever idiot wrote this that John West received membership data on Saturday last from Head Office as the Secretary of Suffolk Coastal Branch. Thus clearly the author is either deliberately wrong and has lied or is ill informed.

The existing sitting committee,
Attended the meeting the bullying Ron Witmore as outgoing chairman and John West as SEcretary - me minded that the Treasurer had previously resigned and also resigned his party membership in disgust at the behaviour of Ron Witmore and the bullying and unelected Peter Reeve.

Thus clearly I am right to contend there is a deliberate and dishonest intent to deceive in the letter EUkip's errand boy posted.

which is still in office headed by its long standing Chairman Ron Whitmore
Were this the case perhaps it can be expplained why this paragon of virtue Ron Witmore had abrogated on his fundamental duty to instruct his secretary to call an AGM within due period as defined in the Branch Constitution.

had legitimatly withdrawn their willingness for West to be a member of their branch
He had no authority under the constitution to act in so dishonest, underhand and corrupt manner.

after he went to the press
I am happy to take oath that it was NOT Mr. West who went to the press - it was I; having heard on the phone from one of my contacts in the eastern region. I contacted 4 or 5 journalists known to me.

Should EUkip choose to challenge me I can provide provenance of a nature of proboity that would outclass the claimed integrity of EUkip's entire shower in leadership.

with trumped up stories about elected UKIP MEPs.
May I suggesrt that EUkip withdraw this dishonest slur on the character of John West, as you have absolutely no grounds to make this dishonest comment - it is a lie which I am already assured that the relevant Police will bear witness to.

I believe he was informed of this decision by the Party in writting weeks ago.
He was not - this is a lie.

The reason that the current branch committee was not there was because it was an illegitimate meeting
A dishonesty which those present will bear witness to. 6 Eligible voting members + The outgoing chairman and June Latter whose membership is understood, by the branch secretary, to have run out. Also present were one guest from another branch a member, also 3 guests who it was hoped would join as members that evening. They did not in the light of the behaviour of Ron Witmore.
In pique at having been exposed as duplicitous and dishonest Ron Witmore stormed out like a spoilt child.

The meeting then continued in a cordial manner.

that West had been informed by the Party could not go ahead.
Untrue and false. Why would others have attended were this true?

The branch AGM will not be called until the new year
The branch AGM has already taken place and due to the incompetence of Ron Wittmore was Constitutionally overdue.

when the branch chairman Ron Whitmore calls it.
Ron Witmore is no longer Chairman - it was legitimately voted on and it was the decision of the branch that if there was dishonest inteeruption of democratic process the branch would disolve and actively campaign in the region against EUkip. I understand already 21 branches are on the verge of closing under The Newmarket Agreement.

Similarly there are various branches who have rejected the authority of the unelected Reeve.

As I understand it, what GLW refers to as a 'unanimous decision' was a meeting that only had around 2 members of the branch at it.
You understand it wrong and the meeting was legitimately quorate.


The handful of others there, including Mr & Mrs West are not even members of the constituency.
You deceive yourself in your desire to misleed others.

GLW is also incorrect about the DCB meeting as there were around 20 people at the meeting he refers to
I am prepared to correct my figure as supplied by one person who was present should you be able to locate an individual of trustworthy character. I do not accept the word written or spoken of a liar such as yourself who lied to disadvantage his associates for personal gain.

Not that of NuttAll or Reeve who have both shown themselves irrefutably to be untrustworthy - nor thew liar, cheat and fraud David the desk Bannerman whose dishonesty is despicable as it exploits the few decent members left in the party.

and this was just one of a series of meetings organised by Donald Martin (the South Suffolk Chairman)
No that is untrue - we speek of the widely advertised and leafleted launch (as stated on the leaflet) launch of EUkip's campaign to dupe the public in The EU elections. Further the meeting at Capel St. Mary was the only such meeting promoted upon EUkip's web site or its blog, as I understand it having looked almost every day for several months.

and his team that occured in a 4 week period.
Perhaps you were to obtuse to realise I was speaking of The Capel St. Mary meeting which was a catastrophe.

I am told that several hundred people attended the DCB talks in total and the branch are very pleased with the results. "

What you are told and what you say are clearly unreliable as you have established a track record of the most unpleasant and underhand dishonest, behaviour and lies at the expense of your colleagues - whether in your own right or as errand boy for others.

Michael McGough you are a liar, a cheat and represent no British values that I recognise - you are an excrescence and a coward.

Many will be aware that Alison & John West are being attacked by the corrupt EUkip by way of intimidation. These intimidations, lies and threats have taken place quite clearly as revenge for the upright character of the Wests and their exposure of EUkip's corruption since before they put their names forward in the selection, election process for experience so that they could do ever better for UKIP in future elections and they were met with dishonesty after dishonesty to the extent of criminality.

One has to wonder just how revoltingly EUkip would act if it ever gained authority - one must fear for our Country that such sordis behaviour is perceived as acceptable even by a failed minority party.

I am disgusted at the behaviour of EUkip's executives!!! AND their duplicitous and dishonest errand boys.

G.L-W.

01291 - 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU